Hybrid Therapy and Heart Team for Atrial Fibrillation (HT2AF)

July 21, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Comparison of the Efficacy of Hybrid Ablative Therapy for Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Versus Conventional Catheter Ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a prevalence ranging from 5% over 60 years old to 17% after 85 years old. Besides hemodynamical compromises and occurrence of heart failure, stroke remains the most feared complication related to AF with a risk increased by 5-fold.

Catheter ablation with the aim of pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) has evolved as a standardized treatment option in paroxysmal AF (PAF), supported by the current guidelines. However, due to advanced electrical and structural remodeling, catheter ablation for persistent AF is rather disappointing with a limited success rate, at least after a single procedure. Due to these shortcomings, minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical techniques have gained attention with good results in persistent AF patients. Comparison between thoracoscopic surgical ablation and catheter ablation have shown that surgical ablation was associated with higher success rates, less redo procedures but also with higher complication rates. The main issue with surgical ablation is the difficulty to check the ablation lines and pulmonary vein isolation, which are the cornerstones for achieving good long-term results.

Hybrid therapy, combining both epicardial surgical and endocardial catheter ablation is expected to be the most effective technique. It would avoid incomplete lesions or incomplete pulmonary vein isolation, and would provide complete lesion set. Hybrid therapy of AF has been compared with mini-invasive surgical ablation of AF, showing a significant higher rate of sinus rhythm achievement in the hybrid therapy group. However, no comparative clinical trials data are currently available in the setting of persistent AF comparing hybrid ablation and conventional catheter ablation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

228

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Toulouse, Hôpital Rangueil
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Bertrand Marcheix, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Etienne Grunenwald, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Philippe Maury, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Anne Rollin, MD
      • Toulouse, France

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To have a history of symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (continuous AF lasting 7 days or more) or long-standing persistent AF (continuous AF lasting for more than 12 months)
  • To be refractory to or intolerant to at least one class I (flecainide / propafenone) or III (sotalol / amiodarone) antiarrhythmic drug,
  • To be at least 18 years of age,
  • To agree to participate (signature of the informed consent)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A previous AF ablation procedure,
  • A longstanding persistent AF > 3 years,
  • A paroxysmal AF
  • AF consecutive to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or other reversible non-cardiovascular cause,
  • Presence of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus,
  • Left atrial size ≥ 70ml/m² on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE),
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%,
  • Cardiac surgery (other than AF treatment) planned within 12 months,
  • Contra-indication to heparin and/or oral anticoagulation
  • Contra-indication to transoesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)
  • Carotid stenosis > 80%,
  • Active infection or sepsis
  • Pleural adhesions,
  • Elevated hemi diaphragm
  • Proven and untreated sleep apnoea syndrome,
  • Occurrence of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or a transient ischemic attack (TIA) during the past 6 months,
  • History of blood clotting abnormalities
  • Indication for a permanent dual antiplatelet therapy
  • History of thoracic radiation,
  • History of myocarditis or pericarditisHistory of cardiac tamponade,
  • History of thoracotomy or cardiac surgery,
  • Body-mass-index > 40 kg/m2,
  • Significant lung dysfunction
  • Contra-indication to anesthesia
  • Patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Pregnancy,
  • Life expectancy less than 12 months,
  • Adults protected by the law

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hybrid ablation procedure
In the hybrid ablation procedure, the epicardial surgical ablation procedure will be combined with percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation procedure in a single step procedure.
In the hybrid ablation arm, the epicardial surgical ablation procedure will be combined with percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation procedure in a single step procedure (same operative time). During the endocardial approach, the isolation of the pulmonary veins and the posterior box will be checked and completed if necessary. Then additional ablation will be performed for atrial tachycardia or ongoing persisting atrial fibrillation (AF) according the same lesions setup or stepwise protocol than the conventional arm
Active Comparator: Percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation procedure
In the percutaneous catheter ablation arm, the procedure will be performed according to the current guidelines (pulmonary vein isolation, linear ablation and fragmented potentials ablation if needed, with the achievement of sinus rhythm during the procedure being the optimal endpoint).
In the percutaneous catheter ablation arm, the procedure will be performed according to the current guidelines (pulmonary vein isolation, linear ablation and fragmented potentials ablation if needed, with the achievement of sinus rhythm during the procedure being the optimal endpoint. Any atrial tachycardia will be mapped and ablated as well (DC shock performed otherwise).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Atrial fibrillation (AF)/Atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence
Time Frame: 12 months
occurrence of at least one episode of AF/AT > 30 seconds in any ECG or Holter tracing (absence or presence)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AF/AT recurrence or major complication
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of patients developing a recurrence of AF/AT or a major complication (related to the procedure or related to AF/AT)
12 months
Major complication related to the procedure
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of patients developing a major complication related to the procedure
12 months
Major complication related to AF/AT
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of patients developing a major complication related to AF/AT
12 months
Any complication (major or minor)
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of patients developing any complication (major or minor) related to the procedure or related to AF/AT
12 months
Redo-procedure
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of patients requiring a redo-procedure (new ablation in left atrium)
12 months
Cardioversion
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of patients requiring a cardioversion
12 months
Number of hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of hospitalizations for AF/AT recurrence or complications related to AF/AT or to the procedure
12 months
Duration of the hospitalization
Time Frame: 1 month
Mean duration of the hospitalization for AF ablation
1 month
Radiation exposure time
Time Frame: 12 months
Radiation exposure time (expressed in minutes) per patient. In case of redo-ablation during the follow-up, the total exposure time of the two first and the redo procedure will be totalized.
12 months
Radiation exposure dosage
Time Frame: 12 months
Radiation exposure dosage per patient. In case of redo-ablation during the follow-up, the total exposure dosage of the two first and the redo procedure will be totalized.
12 months
Antiarrhythmic drugs
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of patients requiring class I (flecainide ou propafenone) or III (sotalol ou amiodarone) antiarrhythmic drugs
12 months
Electrophysiological success
Time Frame: Day 0
Percentage of patients considered as reaching electrophysiological success, i.e. isolation of pulmonary veins and posterior box after epicardial surgical ablation. The validation will be performed during catheter ablation: isolation will be validated if there an entrance block in the posterior wall and in the pulmonary veins.
Day 0
Evolution of quality of life
Time Frame: Between baseline to 12 months
Evolution of quality of life using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Severity in Atrial Fibrillation (CCS-SAF) scale. Symptom severity, physical and emotional components of quality of life, general well-being, and health care consumption related to AF are evaluated by this scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 4, corresponding to 0=no effect on functional quality of life to 4=a severe effect on life quality.
Between baseline to 12 months
ICER
Time Frame: 12 months
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of hybrid ablation versus catheter ablation, including long term evaluation with MARKOV modelling
12 months
ICUR
Time Frame: 12 months
The incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) of hybrid ablation versus catheter ablation, including long term evaluation with MARKOV modelling
12 months
Production costs
Time Frame: during the surgical procedure
Production costs of the two strategies using the micro-costing approach
during the surgical procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philippe Maury, MD, University Hospital of Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Hybrid ablation

3
Subscribe