- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03760315
mNGS vs Culture Critically Ill Patients
August 2, 2022 updated by: Ling Liu, Southeast University, China
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Nanjing Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University School of Medicine,China;
mNGS is popular in research and recently it has been used clinically to detect microbes in the blood or other secretion in infected patients for quicker ,broad and accurate detection of microbes.
In ICU ,patients are critically ill and need quicker and accurate antibiotics use to stop the pathologic process.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the positive detection rate of pathogens in patients with sepsis by metagenomic full-targeted detection technology was higher than that in blood culture, and to determine whether the pathogens found in patients with sepsis by metagenomic full-targeted detection technology were important for clinical development.
Anti-infective regimens can help.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Sepsis patients in ICU were took blood culture sample and blood sample for mNGS test (IDSeqTM Ultra, Combing with Metagenomics and Pathogen/AMR/VF Probe Enrichment).
Clinicians use their knowledge and experience to decide antibiotics use with the guide of Culture results or mNGS results.
Validation with digital droplet PCR assays when metagenomic full-targeted assays identify pathogens not identified in conventional blood cultures The difference between the positive rate of mNGS and the positive rate of blood culture were recorded.
Patient were followed at least 28 days after enrollment or an outcome indicator.
Possible scenarios for detecting clinical impact were detected.
Etiology, biochemical indicators, immune function, infection indicator, secondary infection, SOFA score and length of stay,outcome were recorded.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Anticipated)
210
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210009
- Recruiting
- Nanjing Zhong-Da Hospital
-
Contact:
- Ling Liu, MD.
- Phone Number: 86-25-83272201
- Email: liulingdoctor@126.com
-
Contact:
- Haibo Qiu, PhD.,MD.
- Phone Number: 86-25-83272200
- Email: haiboq2000@yahoo.com.cn
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ling Liu, MD.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patient with sepsis and suspected bloodstream infection
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Age > 18years admit to ICU Meet the Sepsis 3.0 diagnostic criteria and suspected bloodstream infection, and the diagnosis of Sepsis ≤ 24 hours; Estimated ICU stay ≥ 24 hours; Informed consent;
Exclusion Criteria:
Severe organ dysfunction, expected death within 72 hours; Receive palliative care; Refuse to participate;
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sepsis
All enrolled patients
|
take blood samples for mNGS and Culture at the same time in sepsis patients.
No intervention on the treatment of the patients.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
difference of positive rate between mNGS and Culture
Time Frame: 28 day
|
The difference between the positive rate of mNGS and the positive rate of blood culture.
|
28 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The difference between the positive rate of metagenomic full capture technology and the Category of Clinical Impact
Time Frame: 28 day
|
Positive, Negative,None and Indeterminate
|
28 day
|
|
Change of SOFA
Time Frame: 7 day
|
change of SOFA score (include each organ) at baseline, day 3 and day 7 clinical improvement :Improvement in 2 or more clinical signs and symptoms no requirement for additional antibacterial treatment Clinical failure:Persistence or progression of baseline signs and symptoms
|
7 day
|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: During hospitalization
|
28 day,ICU and hospital mortality Documented microbiologic eradication:Absence of primary microbe from infection site Presumed microbiologic eradication:Clinical cure without available microbiologic culture data Presumed microbiologic persistence:Clinical failure in the absence of any microbiologic data Documented microbiologic persistence:Continued presence of MRSA based on microbiologic culture Superinfection: Clinical failure and isolation of a pathogen not present at baseline at the original infection site
|
During hospitalization
|
|
Length of stay
Time Frame: During hospitalization
|
ICU and hospital length of stay
|
During hospitalization
|
|
Anti-infective treatment adjustment
Time Frame: 28 day
|
each Anti-infective treatment adjustment
|
28 day
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pathogen
Time Frame: 28 day
|
all the detect pathogens from mNGS and blood culture
|
28 day
|
|
secondary infection
Time Frame: 28 day
|
infection secondary to the primary infection
|
28 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Haibo Qiu, MD, Southeast University, China
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 30, 2022
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 30, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 29, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
November 30, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 5, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 2, 2022
Last Verified
August 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20181127
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sepsis
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingSepsis | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis and Septic Shock | Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit | Sepsis, Septic Shock | Sepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock | Sepsis With Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) | Sepsis With Acute Organ DysfunctionUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingSepsis Induced Myocardial Dysfunction | Sepsis Induced CardiomyopathyEgypt
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of KansasRecruitingSepsis | Septic Shock | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis Bacterial | Sepsis BacteremiaUnited States
-
Jip GroenInBiomeRecruitingMicrobial Colonization | Neonatal Infection | Neonatal Sepsis, Early-Onset | Microbial Disease | Clinical Sepsis | Culture Negative Neonatal Sepsis | Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset | Culture Positive Neonatal SepsisNetherlands
-
Karolinska InstitutetÖrebro University, SwedenCompletedSepsis | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, SevereSweden
-
The University of QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalUnknown
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityEnrolling by invitationSevere Sepsis | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockUnited States
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedSepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockUnited States
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedSepsis-associated EncephalopathyEgypt
Clinical Trials on blood mNGS (IDSeqTM Ultra); blood Culture
-
Peking University People's HospitalPeking University First Hospital; Peking University International Hospital; Hebei...Recruiting
-
Peking University People's HospitalPeking University First Hospital; Chinese PLA General Hospital; Qilu Hospital... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingInvasive Pulmonary Fungal Disease
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownBlood Stream InfectionEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownNeonatal SepsisEgypt
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompletedBacteremia | Infective EndocarditisFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedBacteremia | Catheter-Related InfectionsFrance
-
University Hospital, GrenobleCEA - LetiNot yet recruiting
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingVAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
-
Stanford UniversityBoston Scientific CorporationCompletedCholedocholithiasis | Bile Duct StrictureUnited States
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcRecruitingArtificial Intelligence | Machine Learning | Randomized Controlled Trial | Emergency Service, Hospital | MicrobiologyNetherlands