mNGS vs Culture Critically Ill Patients

August 2, 2022 updated by: Ling Liu, Southeast University, China

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Nanjing Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University School of Medicine,China;

mNGS is popular in research and recently it has been used clinically to detect microbes in the blood or other secretion in infected patients for quicker ,broad and accurate detection of microbes. In ICU ,patients are critically ill and need quicker and accurate antibiotics use to stop the pathologic process. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the positive detection rate of pathogens in patients with sepsis by metagenomic full-targeted detection technology was higher than that in blood culture, and to determine whether the pathogens found in patients with sepsis by metagenomic full-targeted detection technology were important for clinical development. Anti-infective regimens can help.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Sepsis patients in ICU were took blood culture sample and blood sample for mNGS test (IDSeqTM Ultra, Combing with Metagenomics and Pathogen/AMR/VF Probe Enrichment). Clinicians use their knowledge and experience to decide antibiotics use with the guide of Culture results or mNGS results. Validation with digital droplet PCR assays when metagenomic full-targeted assays identify pathogens not identified in conventional blood cultures The difference between the positive rate of mNGS and the positive rate of blood culture were recorded. Patient were followed at least 28 days after enrollment or an outcome indicator. Possible scenarios for detecting clinical impact were detected. Etiology, biochemical indicators, immune function, infection indicator, secondary infection, SOFA score and length of stay,outcome were recorded.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

210

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210009
        • Recruiting
        • Nanjing Zhong-Da Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ling Liu, MD.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with sepsis and suspected bloodstream infection

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age > 18years admit to ICU Meet the Sepsis 3.0 diagnostic criteria and suspected bloodstream infection, and the diagnosis of Sepsis ≤ 24 hours; Estimated ICU stay ≥ 24 hours; Informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:

Severe organ dysfunction, expected death within 72 hours; Receive palliative care; Refuse to participate;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sepsis
All enrolled patients
take blood samples for mNGS and Culture at the same time in sepsis patients. No intervention on the treatment of the patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
difference of positive rate between mNGS and Culture
Time Frame: 28 day
The difference between the positive rate of mNGS and the positive rate of blood culture.
28 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference between the positive rate of metagenomic full capture technology and the Category of Clinical Impact
Time Frame: 28 day
Positive, Negative,None and Indeterminate
28 day
Change of SOFA
Time Frame: 7 day
change of SOFA score (include each organ) at baseline, day 3 and day 7 clinical improvement :Improvement in 2 or more clinical signs and symptoms no requirement for additional antibacterial treatment Clinical failure:Persistence or progression of baseline signs and symptoms
7 day
Mortality
Time Frame: During hospitalization
28 day,ICU and hospital mortality Documented microbiologic eradication:Absence of primary microbe from infection site Presumed microbiologic eradication:Clinical cure without available microbiologic culture data Presumed microbiologic persistence:Clinical failure in the absence of any microbiologic data Documented microbiologic persistence:Continued presence of MRSA based on microbiologic culture Superinfection: Clinical failure and isolation of a pathogen not present at baseline at the original infection site
During hospitalization
Length of stay
Time Frame: During hospitalization
ICU and hospital length of stay
During hospitalization
Anti-infective treatment adjustment
Time Frame: 28 day
each Anti-infective treatment adjustment
28 day

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pathogen
Time Frame: 28 day
all the detect pathogens from mNGS and blood culture
28 day
secondary infection
Time Frame: 28 day
infection secondary to the primary infection
28 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Haibo Qiu, MD, Southeast University, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20181127

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on blood mNGS (IDSeqTM Ultra); blood Culture

Subscribe