Corticosteroid Treatment in the Acute Phase of Caustic Ingestion Management (CORTICAU)

November 28, 2018 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Corticosteroid Treatment in the Acute Phase of Caustic Ingestion Management for the Prevention of Refractory Stenosis of the Esophagus and Pharynx- The CORTICAU Study

The management of patients who have ingested a caustic product has changed since 2007. Whereas previously the lesion assessment and surgical indication were based on endoscopic data, the therapeutic algorithm is currently based solely on the results of a CT scan with contrast injection, performed 6 hours after ingestion. This examination makes it possible to reliably assess the viability of the esophageal and gastric walls and thus to indicate digestive resection. The therapeutic consequences of this new treatment are important because, by expanding the indications for conservative treatment after severe ingestion, it brings a significant gain in terms of survival, morbidity and functional outcome. In the absence of emergency digestive resection, however, the functional prognosis is often overshadowed by the formation of esophageal stenosis in the months following ingestion. Patients then require endoscopic dilation treatment. In the event of failure or impossibility of dilation, which defines refractory stenosis, esophageal reconstruction is necessary. In case of sequential pharyngeal stenosis following ingestion, esophageal and pharyngeal reconstruction is indicated as a first-line treatment, since these stenosis do not respond to endoscopic dilations. The expansion of the indications for conservative treatment after severe ingestion using CT scans has led to an increase in the incidence of after-effect stenosis.

We aim to develop a therapeutic approach that will prevent the development of refractory and pharyngeal esophageal stenosis. Indeed, there is currently no strategy that has proven effective in this regard in adults. The value of corticosteroid therapy for the prevention of caustic stenosis has only been evaluated in children and remains controversial.

The main objective is to evaluate the effect of early systemic corticosteroid therapy on the risk of refractory esophageal or pharyngeal stenosis within one year of ingestion of a caustic substance in a population of patients at high risk of stenosis, defined according to tomodensitometric criteria (grade IIb: severe lesions, absence of transparietal necrosis), and for whom there is no indication of urgent digestive resection.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years
  • Recent caustic product ingestion (time between taking the product and initiating the evaluated treatment or placebo between 6 and 24 hours after ingestion)
  • Predictive CT criteria for high-risk esophageal stenosis (grade IIb) in its most pathological part
  • Written, signed consent (trusted person if necessary, in case of impossibility of collection)
  • Beneficiary of a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indication of resection or surgical exploration in emergency
  • History of caustic ingestion
  • Corticosteroids taken at a dose greater than 20 mg prednisone within 7 days before randomization
  • Contraindication to corticosteroid therapy:
  • Any infectious condition that required antibiotic treatment within 7 days of randomization
  • Any vaccine living within 7 days of randomization
  • Hypersensitivity to one of the components
  • Pregnancy in progress
  • Breastfeeding in progress
  • Co-intoxication involving vital prognosis and requiring, according to the patient's doctor, intensive care management
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Methylprednisolone
Dose: 500mg/day for the first two days then 2mg/kg per day for three days. Dilution in 0.9% NaCl, 100 ml as a single slow intravenous administration over 60 minutes Total processing time of 5 days
Dose: 500mg/day for the first two days then 2mg/kg per day for three days. Dilution in 0.9% NaCl, 100 ml as a single slow intravenous administration over 60 minutes Total processing time of 5 days
Other Names:
  • Corticosteroid treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo (no corticosteroid treatment)
NaCl 0.9%, 100ml per day as a single slow intravenous administration over 60 minutes for a total treatment duration of 5 days
NaCl 0.9%, 100ml per day as a single slow intravenous administration over 60 minutes for a total treatment duration of 5 days
Other Names:
  • Control Arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Indication for esophageal or pharyngeal surgical reconstruction
Time Frame: within 12 months post ingestion

The primary outcome is the indication for esophageal or pharyngeal surgical reconstruction due to:

  1. The occurrence of one or more esophageal stenosis refractory to endoscopic dilation within 12 months of ingestion, as defined by:

    • The need for more than 5 sessions of esophageal endoscopic dilation
    • Non-expandable stenosis or esophageal obstruction;
    • An esophageal perforation that occurs during dilation, which contraindicates the continuation of dilation.
  2. The occurrence of pharyngeal stenosis, defined by the need to perform pharyngoplasty.
within 12 months post ingestion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delay in the occurrence of refractory stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 1 month
Time between inclusion and occurrence of refractory stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
at 1 month
Delay in the occurrence of refractory stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 3 months
Time between inclusion and occurrence of refractory stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
at 3 months
Delay in the occurrence of refractory stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 6 months
Time between inclusion and occurrence of refractory stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
at 6 months
Delay in the occurrence of refractory stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 9 months
Time between inclusion and occurrence of refractory stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
at 9 months
Delay in the occurrence of refractory esophagal stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 12 months
Time between inclusion and occurrence of refractory stenosis or pharyngeal stenosis
at 12 months
Distance of the stenosis
Time Frame: at 1 month
Distance between the stenosis and the dental arches (cm)
at 1 month
Distance of the stenosis
Time Frame: at 3 months
Distance between the stenosis and the dental arches (cm)
at 3 months
Distance of the stenosis
Time Frame: at 6 months
Distance between the stenosis and the dental arches (cm)
at 6 months
Distance of the stenosis
Time Frame: at 9 months
Distance between the stenosis and the dental arches (cm)
at 9 months
Distance of the stenosis
Time Frame: at 12 months
Distance between the stenosis and the dental arches (cm)
at 12 months
Number of stenosis
Time Frame: at 1 month
Number of stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 1 month
Number of stenosis
Time Frame: at 3 months
Number of stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 3 months
Number of stenosis
Time Frame: at 6 months
Number of stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 6 months
Number of stenosis
Time Frame: at 9 months
Number of stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 9 months
Number of stenosis
Time Frame: at 12 months
Number of stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 12 months
Length of stenosis
Time Frame: at 1 month
Length of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 1 month
Length of stenosis
Time Frame: at 3 months
Length of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 3 months
Length of stenosis
Time Frame: at 6 months
Length of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 6 months
Length of stenosis
Time Frame: at 9 months
Length of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 9 months
Length of stenosis
Time Frame: at 12 months
Length of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 12 months
Estimated diameter of stenosis
Time Frame: at 1 month
Diameter of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 1 month
Estimated diameter of stenosis
Time Frame: at 3 months
Diameter of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 3 months
Estimated diameter of stenosis
Time Frame: at 6 months
Diameter of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 6 months
Estimated diameter of stenosis
Time Frame: at 9 months
Diameter of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 9 months
Estimated diameter of stenosis
Time Frame: at 12 months
Diameter of each stenosis will be evaluated by endoscopy
at 12 months
Endoluminal inflammation
Time Frame: at 1 month
Importance of endoluminal inflammation during endoscopy performed for dilation (minimal, moderate, or severe)
at 1 month
Endoluminal inflammation
Time Frame: at 3 months
Importance of endoluminal inflammation during endoscopy performed for dilation (minimal, moderate, or severe)
at 3 months
Endoluminal inflammation
Time Frame: at 6 months
Importance of endoluminal inflammation during endoscopy performed for dilation (minimal, moderate, or severe)
at 6 months
Endoluminal inflammation
Time Frame: at 9 months
Importance of endoluminal inflammation during endoscopy performed for dilation (minimal, moderate, or severe)
at 9 months
Endoluminal inflammation
Time Frame: at 12 months
Importance of endoluminal inflammation during endoscopy performed for dilation (minimal, moderate, or severe)
at 12 months
Number of dilation sessions
Time Frame: at 1 month
Number of dilation sessions evaluated by endoscopy
at 1 month
Number of dilation sessions
Time Frame: at 3 months
Number of dilation sessions evaluated by endoscopy
at 3 months
Number of dilation sessions
Time Frame: at 6 months
Number of dilation sessions evaluated by endoscopy
at 6 months
Number of dilation sessions
Time Frame: at 9 months
Number of dilation sessions evaluated by endoscopy
at 9 months
Number of dilation sessions
Time Frame: at 12 months
Number of dilation sessions evaluated by endoscopy
at 12 months
Intervals between iterative dilations
Time Frame: at 1 month
Time between endoscopic dilatations if necessary iterative dilation
at 1 month
Intervals between iterative dilations
Time Frame: at 3 months
Time between endoscopic dilatations if necessary iterative dilation
at 3 months
Intervals between iterative dilations
Time Frame: at 6 months
Time between endoscopic dilatations if necessary iterative dilation
at 6 months
Intervals between iterative dilations
Time Frame: at 9 months
Time between endoscopic dilatations if necessary iterative dilation
at 9 months
Intervals between iterative dilations
Time Frame: at 12 months
Time between endoscopic dilatations if necessary iterative dilation
at 12 months
Digestive perforations
Time Frame: at 1 month
Proportion of digestive perforations secondary to endoscopic dilation
at 1 month
Digestive perforations
Time Frame: at 3 months
Proportion of digestive perforations secondary to endoscopic dilation
at 3 months
Digestive perforations
Time Frame: at 6 months
Proportion of digestive perforations secondary to endoscopic dilation
at 6 months
Digestive perforations
Time Frame: at 9 months
Proportion of digestive perforations secondary to endoscopic dilation
at 9 months
Digestive perforations
Time Frame: at 12 months
Proportion of digestive perforations secondary to endoscopic dilation
at 12 months
Extent of pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 1 month
Laryngeal stenosis associated with pharyngeal stenosis
at 1 month
Extent of pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 3 months
Laryngeal stenosis associated with pharyngeal stenosis
at 3 months
Extent of pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 6 months
Laryngeal stenosis associated with pharyngeal stenosis
at 6 months
Extent of pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 9 months
Laryngeal stenosis associated with pharyngeal stenosis
at 9 months
Extent of pharyngeal stenosis
Time Frame: at 12 months
Laryngeal stenosis associated with pharyngeal stenosis
at 12 months
Proportion of unanticipated adverse reactions
Time Frame: at day 0
Unanticipated adverse reactions will be defined by the occurrence of death,cardiac arrest whatever the cause,unplanned admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or extended stay > 24 ICU
at day 0
Proportion of unanticipated adverse reactions
Time Frame: at day 2
Unanticipated adverse reactions will be defined by the occurrence of death,cardiac arrest whatever the cause,unplanned admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or extended stay > 24 ICU
at day 2
Proportion of unanticipated adverse reactions
Time Frame: at day 5
Unanticipated adverse reactions will be defined by the occurrence of death,cardiac arrest whatever the cause,unplanned admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or extended stay > 24 ICU
at day 5
Proportion of unanticipated adverse reactions
Time Frame: at day 7
Unanticipated adverse reactions will be defined by the occurrence of death,cardiac arrest whatever the cause,unplanned admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or extended stay > 24 ICU
at day 7
Proportion of unanticipated adverse reactions
Time Frame: at one month
Unanticipated adverse reactions will be defined by the occurrence of death,cardiac arrest whatever the cause,unplanned admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or extended stay > 24 ICU
at one month
Proportion of unanticipated adverse reactions
Time Frame: at 3 months
Unanticipated adverse reactions will be defined by the occurrence of death,cardiac arrest whatever the cause,unplanned admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or extended stay > 24 ICU
at 3 months
Proportion of unanticipated adverse reactions
Time Frame: at 6 months
Unanticipated adverse reactions will be defined by the occurrence of death,cardiac arrest whatever the cause,unplanned admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or extended stay > 24 ICU
at 6 months
Proportion of unanticipated adverse reactions
Time Frame: at 9 months
Unanticipated adverse reactions will be defined by the occurrence of death,cardiac arrest whatever the cause,unplanned admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or extended stay > 24 ICU
at 9 months
Proportion of unanticipated adverse reactions
Time Frame: at 12 months
Unanticipated adverse reactions will be defined by the occurrence of death,cardiac arrest whatever the cause,unplanned admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or extended stay > 24 ICU
at 12 months
Proportion of adverse reactions related to corticosteroid therapy
Time Frame: within 7 days
Adverse reactions related to corticosteroid therapy will be defined by the occurrence of infections needing antibiotic therapy or spontaneous digestive perforation or digestive bleeding or cardiac arrhythmias de novo or pulmonary edema requiring treatment (increased oxygen requirements and/or Diuretic and/or Vasodilator and/or non-invasive ventilation and/or invasive ventilation) or respiratory complications (High blood pressure requiring treatment - Metabolic alkalosis- Hypokalemia<3.0mmol/l - Delirium- Decompensation of a psychiatric pathology)
within 7 days
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: at day 0
Inflammation markers
at day 0
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: at day 2
Inflammation markers
at day 2
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: at day 5
Inflammation markers
at day 5
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: at one month
Inflammation markers
at one month
interleukin-1 (IL1)
Time Frame: at day 0
Inflammation markers
at day 0
interleukin-1 (IL1)
Time Frame: at day 2
Inflammation markers
at day 2
interleukin-1 (IL1)
Time Frame: at day 5
Inflammation markers
at day 5
interleukin-1 (IL1)
Time Frame: at one month
Inflammation markers
at one month
interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: at day 0
Inflammation markers
at day 0
interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: at day 2
Inflammation markers
at day 2
interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: at day 5
Inflammation markers
at day 5
interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: at one month
Inflammation markers
at one month
Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF alpha)
Time Frame: at day 0
Inflammation markers
at day 0
Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF alpha)
Time Frame: at day 2
Inflammation markers
at day 2
Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF alpha)
Time Frame: at day 5
Inflammation markers
at day 5
Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF alpha)
Time Frame: at one month
Inflammation markers
at one month
Tissue Growth Factor Beta (TGF beta)
Time Frame: at day 0
Fibrosis markers
at day 0
Tissue Growth Factor Beta (TGF beta)
Time Frame: at day 2
Fibrosis markers
at day 2
Tissue Growth Factor Beta (TGF beta)
Time Frame: at day 5
Fibrosis markers
at day 5
Tissue Growth Factor Beta (TGF beta)
Time Frame: at one month
Fibrosis markers
at one month
Galectin 3
Time Frame: at day 0
Fibrosis markers
at day 0
Galectin 3
Time Frame: at day 2
Fibrosis markers
at day 2
Galectin 3
Time Frame: at day 5
Fibrosis markers
at day 5
Galectin 3
Time Frame: at one month
Fibrosis markers
at one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 15, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 15, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Methylprednisolone

3
Subscribe