Five Year Oncological Outcome After CME for Sigmoid Colon Cancer

June 25, 2024 updated by: Nordsjaellands Hospital

Five Year Oncological Outcome After Complete Mesocolic Excision for Sigmoid Colon Cancer: a Population-based Cohort Study

Study based in existing databases investigating the causal oncological treatment effects of complete mesocolic excision on UICC stage I-III sigmoid colon cancer

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Population-based cohort study, predominantly prospective based, on the same population as our previously study comparing short-term outcome after CME with conventional colon resections. The COMES database combines the prospectively registered colon cancer database in Hillerød (CME data), and data from the national database of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) covering patients undergoing conventional resection (non-CME) in the other three centers. The medical records of all the patients in the non-CME group (control group) were reviewed by colorectal surgeons from Hillerød. Data audit for all CME patients was performed by various co-authors employed at the other centers. A similar audit of data for non-CME patients having postoperative complications or recurrence was performed by the co-author representing the department treating the specific patients. Follow-up data were registered prospectively in the medical records of the participating departments during patient follow-up.

Continuous data are presented as median and interquartile ranges, and categorical data as frequencies and proportions. Kruskal-Wallis test and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. Death is a competing risk to recurrence and time-to-event analyses were performed as competing risk analyses obtaining the cumulative incidences for recurrence or death using the "cmprsk" R-package.

Unbiased estimation of marginal or population-averaged treatment effects in observational and non-randomized studies can be obtained through different propensity score methods. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) uses the propensity score to weight each patient's data based on the inverse probability of receiving the treatment actually received. IPTW gives unbiased estimates of average treatment effects in time-to-event analyses if no differences in observed baseline covariates exist between the treatment groups. To account for baseline differences between patients in the two groups, stabilized weights truncated at the 0.99 interval were calculated using the "IPW" R-package. The following baseline covariates will be used: age, sex, ASA score, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor morphology, perineural invasion, extramural venous invasion, tumor stage, and serosal invasion. All covariates used and UICC stage, two-way interactions, and squared terms of continuous covariates will be assessed for balance between the CME and the non-CME group after IPTW using the "cobalt" R-package. Absolute mean differences in mean (using standardized mean difference) and proportions (using raw mean difference) below 0.1, and variance ratios between 0.5 and 2 will be accepted. Graphical inspection of the distribution of covariates will be also performed.

The cause-specific hazards and overall survival will be analyzed using Cox regression. Binary outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression. Lymph node yield will be analyzed using linear regression after logarithmic transformation. Number of metastatic lymph nodes will be analyzed using negative binominal regression. All analyses of primary and secondary outcomes will be performed after IPTW. The 95% confidence intervals for the estimates from the original Cox regression IPTW analyses will be constructed after 1000 bootstraps with replacement, and a robust sandwich estimator will be used for the logistic regression analyses in order to ensure correct variance estimation.

All available data will be used. Model assumptions will be checked. A p-value below or equal to 0.05 will be considered significant. All analyses will be performed using R statistical software, version 3.5.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

920

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Data for all patients undergoing elective surgery for UICC stage I-III colonic adenocarcinoma in the Capital Region of Denmark. The population of this region is approximately 1⋅75 million, more than 30 per cent of the population of Denmark, and it is served by only four public university colorectal cancer centres.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sigmoid colon cancer was defined as primary adenocarcinomas located in the sigmoid colon (more than 15 cm from the anal verge)
  • UICC stage I-III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Synchronous colorectal cancer - even in the sigmoid colon
  • No residual tumor in the specimen after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Metachronous colorectal cancer
  • Resections in Hillerød not performed according to the principles of CME
  • Non-macroradical (R2) resections (peroperative assessment)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CME group
The CME group consisted of patients, who underwent elective CME for sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma at Nordsjaellands Hospital Hillerød from 1 June 2008 to 31 December 2014.
Based on the principles of CME. The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) was divided at its origin from the aorta to perform central lymph nodes dissection along the IMA between the aorta and the branching of the left colic artery. Sigmoid resection included the complete sigmoid colon and resection of the upper part of the rectum to ensure sufficient perfusion of the colo-rectal anastomosis. To achieve sufficient distance at the proximal bowel resection margin, parts of the descending colon or even left hemicolectomy were performed at the surgeon's discretion.
Non-CME group
The non-CME group comprised patients having a elective conventional colon cancer resection for sigmoid adenocarcinoma at the other three colorectal centers in the Capital Region of Denmark from 1 June 2008 to 31 December 2013.
The patients underwent what was considered standard colon cancer resections in Denmark during the study period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk of recurrence
Time Frame: 5.2 years

Recurrence diagnosed by CT or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT of thorax and abdomen, chest radiograph and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver, or laparotomy in case of suspicion of recurrence. Histological

- Page 4 of 6 - verification of radiological findings of metastases during follow-up is not needed if the local multidisciplinary team conference deemed the finding as a recurrence. Metachronous colon tumors diagnosed during follow-up are considered as recurrences only if located in the anastomosis and with the same morphology as the primary tumor.

5.2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5.2 years
Death by any cause
5.2 years
Short-term mortality
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days
Death from any cause within 30 and 90 days
30 and 90 days
Rate of postoperative complications
Time Frame: 60 days
Patients having surgical and non-surgical postoperative complications and with complications with Clavien-Dindo score of 3b or more
60 days
Mesocolic lymph nodes yield
Time Frame: 1 day
Median number of lymph nodes detected in the specimens and proportion of specimens with 22 or more lymph nodes detected
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Claus A Bertelsen, PhD, MD, Department of Surgery, Nordsjaellands Hospital Hillerød

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sigmoid Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Complete mesocolic excision

Subscribe