- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03797313
Observational Study of Expected ARF Recovery (OSEAR)
December 14, 2021 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
Observational Study of Expected Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) Recovery
This is an observational cohort study of the association between patient expectations for functional recovery and quality of life among acute respiratory failure survivors 6 months after hospital discharge.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Detailed Description
This study will enroll adults who are diagnosed with acute respiratory failure during an ICU admission and discharged from the ICU alive.
All participants will receive usual clinical care.
Participant expectations for functional recovery will be assessed before hospital discharge via a standardized questionnaire containing a visual analogue scale and questions about expected ability and importance of being able to perform activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living in 6 months.
At 6 months, participants will be re-contacted by phone.
Study staff will administer questionnaires to assess whether patient expectations have been met.
Quality of life will be assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF and the EQ-5D-VAS.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
180
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins University
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37235
- Vanderbilt University
-
-
Utah
-
Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
- Intermountain Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
survivors of acute respiratory failure (ARF) who are expected to be discharged home alive.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Respiratory failure managed in the ICU, where respiratory failure is defined as ≥1 of the following:
- Mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube ≥ 24 hours OR
- Non-invasive ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP) ≥ 24 consecutive hours* provided for acute respiratory failure (not for Obstructive Sleep Apnea or other stable use) OR
High flow nasal cannula with FIO2 ≥ 0.5 and flow rate ≥ 30 LPM for ≥ 24 consecutive hours*
*Occasional rest periods of ≤ 1 hour each are not deducted from the calculation of consecutive hours.
- Expected by the clinical team to be discharged home alive
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient in ICU < 24 hours
- Mechanical ventilation at baseline or mechanical ventilation solely for airway protection or obstruction
- Residing in a medical institution at the time of hospital admission
- Homeless / Prisoner / Primary residence not in the USA / Unable to communicate by telephone in English
- More than mild dementia (either known diagnosis of moderate or worse dementia or IQ-CODE > 3.6; screening performed on patients > 50 years old or with family reports of possible memory decline)
- Patient on hospice at or before time of enrollment
- Patients who, based solely on pre-existing medical problems (such as poorly controlled neoplasm or other end stage disease, including Stage IV heart failure or severe burns), would not be expected to survive 6 months in the absence of the acute respiratory failure.
- Patients with neurological injury either receiving treatment for intracranial hypertension or who are not expected to return to consciousness.
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Patient's expectations met at Hospital discharge
ARF survivors whose expectations for recovery at hospital discharge are fully met 6 months later.
|
|
Patient's with unmet expectations at Hospital Discharge
ARF survivors whose expectations for recovery at hospital discharge are not fully met 6 months later.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of life measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) after hospital discharge
Time Frame: 6 months after hospital discharge
|
WHOQOL-BREF is a measure of overall quality of life that evaluates satisfaction with important aspects of life rather than of health.
The instrument contains 26 items across 4 domains, and requires approximately 5 minutes to administer over the phone.
The 26 items in the WHOQOL-BREF are scored in four domains: physical, psychological, social relations, and environment, with between 3 and 8 items in each domain and two "benchmark" items addressing overall QoL.
Transforming the raw scores results in a domain score between 0 - 100, enabling comparisons between domains with different numbers of items.
Higher scores indicate greater participant satisfaction with their quality of life and lower scores indicate worse satisfaction with quality of life.
|
6 months after hospital discharge
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient expectation error measure using EQ-5D VAS
Time Frame: 6 months after hospital discharge
|
A secondary analysis will estimate patient expectation error, defined as the difference between the health-related quality of life score expected at hospital discharge and the actual health related quality of life score assessed using the EQ-5D VAS 6 months after hospital discharge.
The EQ-5D VAS ranges from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state and 100 representing the best imaginable health state.
|
6 months after hospital discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alison Turnbull, Johns Hopkins University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.
- Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095.
- Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, Zawistowski C, Bemis-Dougherty A, Berney SC, Bienvenu OJ, Brady SL, Brodsky MB, Denehy L, Elliott D, Flatley C, Harabin AL, Jones C, Louis D, Meltzer W, Muldoon SR, Palmer JB, Perme C, Robinson M, Schmidt DM, Scruth E, Spill GR, Storey CP, Render M, Votto J, Harvey MA. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75.
- Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
- Kamdar BB, Huang M, Dinglas VD, Colantuoni E, von Wachter TM, Hopkins RO, Needham DM; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Joblessness and Lost Earnings after Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in a 1-Year National Multicenter Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 15;196(8):1012-1020. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201611-2327OC.
- Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
- Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M, Stern EJ, Hudson LD. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1685-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050333.
- Charney DS. Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;161(2):195-216. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.195.
- Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20-30. doi: 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20. No abstract available.
- Cox CE, Docherty SL, Brandon DH, Whaley C, Attix DK, Clay AS, Dore DV, Hough CL, White DB, Tulsky JA. Surviving critical illness: acute respiratory distress syndrome as experienced by patients and their caregivers. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2702-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6f64a.
- Spragg RG, Bernard GR, Checkley W, Curtis JR, Gajic O, Guyatt G, Hall J, Israel E, Jain M, Needham DM, Randolph AG, Rubenfeld GD, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Young D, Harabin AL. Beyond mortality: future clinical research in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 May 15;181(10):1121-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201001-0024WS. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
- Zambon M, Vincent JL. Mortality rates for patients with acute lung injury/ARDS have decreased over time. Chest. 2008 May;133(5):1120-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2134. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
- Phua J, Badia JR, Adhikari NK, Friedrich JO, Fowler RA, Singh JM, Scales DC, Stather DR, Li A, Jones A, Gattas DJ, Hallett D, Tomlinson G, Stewart TE, Ferguson ND. Has mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome decreased over time?: A systematic review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb 1;179(3):220-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200805-722OC. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
- Hopkins RO, Suchyta MR, Kamdar BB, Darowski E, Jackson JC, Needham DM. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living after Critical Illness: A Systematic Review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(8):1332-1343. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201701-059SR.
- Lieu TA, Au D, Krishnan JA, Moss M, Selker H, Harabin A, Taggart V, Connors A; Comparative Effectiveness Research in Lung Diseases Workshop Panel. Comparative effectiveness research in lung diseases and sleep disorders: recommendations from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct 1;184(7):848-56. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201104-0634WS.
- Carson SS, Goss CH, Patel SR, Anzueto A, Au DH, Elborn S, Gerald JK, Gerald LB, Kahn JM, Malhotra A, Mularski RA, Riekert KA, Rubenfeld GD, Weaver TE, Krishnan JA; American Thoracic Society Comparative Effectiveness Research Working Group. An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov 15;188(10):1253-61. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1790ST.
- Cox CE, Martinu T, Sathy SJ, Clay AS, Chia J, Gray AL, Olsen MK, Govert JA, Carson SS, Tulsky JA. Expectations and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2888-94; quiz 2904. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ab86ed.
- Lamas DJ, Owens RL, Nace RN, Massaro AF, Pertsch NJ, Gass J, Bernacki RE, Block SD. Opening the Door: The Experience of Chronic Critical Illness in a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital. Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e357-e362. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002094.
- Turnbull AE, Davis WE, Needham DM, White DB, Eakin MN. Intensivist-reported Facilitators and Barriers to Discussing Post-Discharge Outcomes with Intensive Care Unit Surrogates. A Qualitative Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Sep;13(9):1546-52. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-212OC.
- Thompson AG, Sunol R. Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Jun;7(2):127-41. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.2.127.
- Gonzalez Saenz de Tejada M, Escobar A, Herrera C, Garcia L, Aizpuru F, Sarasqueta C. Patient expectations and health-related quality of life outcomes following total joint replacement. Value Health. 2010 Jun-Jul;13(4):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00685.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
- Soroceanu A, Ching A, Abdu W, McGuire K. Relationship between preoperative expectations, satisfaction, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 15;37(2):E103-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182245c1f.
- Hamilton DF, Lane JV, Gaston P, Patton JT, Macdonald D, Simpson AH, Howie CR. What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement. BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 9;3(4):e002525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002525. Print 2013.
- Pihl K, Roos EM, Nissen N, JoRgensen U, Schjerning J, Thorlund JB. Over-optimistic patient expectations of recovery and leisure activities after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec;87(6):615-621. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1228411. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
- Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Sears ED, Chung KC. Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2014 May;155(5):799-808. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
- Aversa M, Chowdhury NA, Tomlinson G, Singer LG. Preoperative expectations for health-related quality of life after lung transplant. Clin Transplant. 2018 Oct;32(10):e13394. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13394. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
- Cosco TD, Kaushal A, Richards M, Kuh D, Stafford M. Resilience measurement in later life: a systematic review and psychometric analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 28;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0418-6.
- Shumaker SC, Frazier SK, Moser DK, Chung ML. Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in Patients With Heart Failure. J Nurs Meas. 2017 Apr 1;25(1):90-102. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.25.1.90.
- Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):274-86. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6016.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 22, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 7, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
January 9, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 15, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 14, 2021
Last Verified
February 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00197235
- 00181895 (Other Identifier: Other)
- K01HL141637-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Failure
-
Efficacy Care R&D LtdMemorial Hermann Hospital; CRG Medical, Inc.UnknownShock | Shock, Septic | Respiratory Failure | Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Shock, Cardiogenic | Acute Cardiac Failure | Acute Respiratory Failure | Acute Kidney Failure | Multi Organ Failure | Respiratory Arrest | Acute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia | Acute Respiratory Failure Requiring Reintubation | Acute... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingAcute Respiratory FailureFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingAcute Respiratory FailureFrance
-
Laval UniversityRecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure | Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure | High Flow Oxygen Therapy | Oxygen DeliveryCanada
-
University of MilanRecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure (ARF)Italy
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalRecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure (ARF)China
-
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaRecruitingAcute Respiratory Failure (ARF)Italy
-
Southeast University, ChinaNot yet recruitingAcute Respiratory Failure (ARF)
-
Dr. Behcet Uz Children's HospitalCompletedAcute Respiratory Failure | Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure | Acute Hypoxemic and Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureTurkey
-
Muhammed Ata Nur GEÇERBakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalNot yet recruitingPediatric | Pediatric Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure