Inhaled Sevofluran vs Endovenous Propofol for Colonoscopy

January 23, 2019 updated by: Leopoldo Wulff, Centro Medico Docente la Trinidad

Inhaled Sevofluran vs Endovenous Propofol for Sedation Maintenance in Patients Submitted to Colonoscopy

To compare the anesthetic efficacy of the inhalation versus intravenous technique for maintenance of sedation in patients undergoing endoscopy.

A longitudinal, randomized clinical study of 32 patients of both sexes ASA I-III, aged 18-80 years undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy, which was randomly divided into 2 groups. In both, intravenous induction with propofol (2-2.5 mg / kg) was performed, Group A remained sedated with propofol infusion (1-2 mg / kg / min); Group B by inhalation with sevoflurane at a concentration of 2 vol% through a nasal cannula with an oxygen flow.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 80 years
  • physical status I, II and III according to the criteria of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)
  • patients who are going to undergo diagnostic colonoscopies
  • patients who signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to some of the reference drugs in the study
  • patients with proven liver disease
  • suspicion or confirmation of pregnancy
  • antecedent or risk of malignant hyperthermia
  • fasting less than 8 hours
  • patients with psychic disorders or mental incapacity that make it difficult to understand their participation in the study
  • patients who have acute illnesses that compromise their health for which the study cannot be performed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Group Propofol
propofol infusion
after inicial bolus of propofol, remained sedated with propofol infusion (1-2 mg/kg/min)
EXPERIMENTAL: Group Sevoflurane
inhalation with sevoflurane
after inicial bolus of propofol, remained sedated by inhalation with sevoflurane at a concentration of 2 vol% through a nasal cannula with an oxygen flow.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Recovery Time
Time Frame: 30 min
Every 5 minutes till a score of 10/10 achieved on Aldrete Score
30 min
Heart rate
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy - an estimated mean time of 20 minutes
heart rate per minute
During the colonoscopy - an estimated mean time of 20 minutes
Propofol dosage
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy - an estimated mean time of 20 minutes
propofol rescate bolus administered
During the colonoscopy - an estimated mean time of 20 minutes
arterial pressure
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy - an estimated mean time of 20 minutes
non invasive arterial pressure every 5 minutes
During the colonoscopy - an estimated mean time of 20 minutes
oxygen saturation
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy - an estimated mean time of 20 minutes
pulse oximetry
During the colonoscopy - an estimated mean time of 20 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
adverse reactions in patients
Time Frame: 1 day (postoperative)
desaturation, laryngospasm
1 day (postoperative)
Endoscopist Satisfaction
Time Frame: 60 min
Endoscopist Satisfaction scored from 1-10. Will be tested on a numerical scale from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (fully satisfied)
60 min
Qualitatively assess patient comfort after sedation.
Time Frame: Up to 1 hour after completing the study.
poor, regular or good
Up to 1 hour after completing the study.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 28, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Propofol

3
Subscribe