Using Survey to Explore Perceptions of Adults With Low Socioeconomic Status Regarding the NutriQuébec Study

February 19, 2019 updated by: Laval University

Recruiting Participants With Low Socioeconomic Status in the NutriQuébec Study: Using Survey to Explore Their Beliefs, Preferences and Concerns

Populations with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to develop diseases across lifespan and are frequently underrepresented in large cohort studies. The aim of this study is to examine beliefs, preferences and concerns towards participating in an e-cohort prospective study on nutrition (NutriQuébec) among this population.

A cross-sectional survey will be completed by 418 adults in the Province of Québec (Canada), including individuals with low SES (high school or less and gross annual household income < $55,000 canadian). The survey is based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and assesses intention to participate in NutriQuébec as well as attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control. The survey also assesses preferences regarding the recruitment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A cross-sectional survey will be completed by 418 participants from several administrative regions of Québec (Canada). A special effort will be made to recruit men and women with low socioeconomic status (SES), but without rejecting adults from middle/high SES. First, 325 adults from low SES (high school or less and gross annual household income < $55,000 canadian) and from several administrative regions of Québec will be identified by a survey firm. In addition, an e-mail mailing list from the Institute of Nutrition and Functional Food (INAF, Laval University) will be used to distribute the recruitment ad to complete our sample (n=93 from all SES).

The survey is based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and assesses intention to participate in NutriQuébec as well as attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control. The salient beliefs underlying the determinants of individual's intention to participate in the NutriQuébec study most frequently cited in the focus groups (from a preliminary elicitation study: 2018-042 A-1/18-05-2018) were used to develop the survey questions. The survey also assesses the preferences regarding the recruitment. Sociodemographic questions are also asked.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

418

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Québec, Canada, G1V 0A6
        • Laval University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with low/middle/high socioeconomic status

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (18 years of age or older)
  • Living in the province of Québec
  • Have access to the Internet and have an active email address
  • Be able to answer questionnaires in French

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Adults-low socioeconomic status
Survey completed by adults with low socioeconomic status
The survey is based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and assesses intention to participate in NutriQuébec as well as attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control. The salient beliefs underlying the determinants of individual's intention to participate in the NutriQuébec study most frequently cited in the focus groups (from a preliminary elicitation study: 2018-042 A-1/18-05-2018) were used to develop the survey questions. The survey also assesses the preferences regarding the recruitment. Sociodemographic questions are also asked.
Adults-middle/high socioeconomic status
Survey completed by adults with middle/high socioeconomic status
The survey is based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and assesses intention to participate in NutriQuébec as well as attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control. The salient beliefs underlying the determinants of individual's intention to participate in the NutriQuébec study most frequently cited in the focus groups (from a preliminary elicitation study: 2018-042 A-1/18-05-2018) were used to develop the survey questions. The survey also assesses the preferences regarding the recruitment. Sociodemographic questions are also asked.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The intention to participate to the NutriQuébec study will be assessed by a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Time Frame: Baseline
Intention will be calculated as the mean of three questions on a five point bipolar Likert scale. The three questions are: 1) I intend to participate in the NutriQuébec study : 1=very unlikely, 2=rather unlikely, 3=neither likely nor unlikely, 4=rather likely, 5=very likely; 2) The chances that I participate in the NutriQuébec study are : 1=very small, 2=rather small, 3=neither high nor small, 4=rather high, 5=very high; 3) I will participate in the NutriQuébec study: 1=very unlikely, 2=rather unlikely, 3=neither likely nor unlikely, 4=rather likely, 5=very likely). Thus, the mean score for intention ranges from 1 to 5, with higher values reflecting a greater likelihood for participation in the NutriQuébec study.
Baseline
The attitude related to a hypothetical participation in the NutriQuébec study will be assessed by a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Time Frame: Baseline
The attitude will be calculated as the mean of three questions on a five point bipolar Likert scale. The three questions are: 1) For me, participating in the NutriQuébec study would be...: 1=very unpleasant, 2=rather unpleasant, 3=neither pleasant nor unpleasant, 4=rather pleasant, 5=very pleasant; 2) For me, participating in the NutriQuébec study would be...: 1=very useless, 2=rather useless, 3=neither useful nor useless, 4=rather useful, 5=very useful; 3) For me, participating in the NutriQuébec study would be…: 1=very unsatisfactory, 2=rather unsatisfactory, 3=neither satisfactory nor unsatisfactory, 4=rather satisfactory, 5=very satisfactory. Thus, the mean score for attitude ranges from 1 to 5, with higher values reflecting a more positive attitude towards a participation in the NutriQuébec study.
Baseline
The subjective norm related to a hypothetical participation in the NutriQuébec study will be assessed by a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Time Frame: Baseline
The subjective norm will be calculated as the mean of three questions on a five point bipolar Likert scale. The three questions are: 1) The people most important to me might think that I should participate in the NutriQuébec study:1=very unlikely, 2=rather unlikely, 3=neither likely nor unlikely, 4=rather likely, 5=very likely; 2) Many people I know may be interested in participating in the NutriQuébec study: 1=very unlikely, 2=rather unlikely, 3=neither likely nor unlikely, 4=rather likely, 5=very likely; 3) If I participated in the NutriQuébec study, most people who are important to me could...: 1= strongly disapprove, 2= slightly disapprove, 3=neither approve nor disapprove, 4= slightly approve, 5=strongly approve. Thus, the mean score for the subjective norm ranges from 1 to 5, with higher values representing perceptions that important others expect the participant to participating in the NutriQuébec study.
Baseline
The perceived behavioural control related to a hypothetical participation in the NutriQuébec study will be assessed by a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Time Frame: Baseline
The perceived behavioural control will be calculated by the mean of three questions on a five point bipolar Likert scale. The three questions are: 1) I feel able to participate in the NutriQuébec study: 1=very unlikely, 2=rather unlikely, 3=neither likely nor unlikely, 4=rather likely, 5=very likely; 2) I am confident that I can overcome any obstacles that may prevent me from participating in the NutriQuébec study: 1=very unlikely, 2=rather unlikely, 3=neither likely nor unlikely, 4=rather likely, 5=very likely; 3) For me, participating in the NutriQuébec study would be....: 1=very difficult, 2=rather difficult, 3=neither easy nor difficult, 4=rather easy, 5=very easy. Thus, the mean score for the perceived behavioural control ranges from 1 to 5, with higher values representing a greater perceived behavioural control towards a participation in the NutriQuébec study.
Baseline
The determinants to the intention to participate to the NutriQuébec study will be assessed by a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Time Frame: Baseline
Determinants to the intention to participate in the NutriQuébec study will be identified with a multiple linear regression using constructs that will be found significant in influencing the intention to participate in the NutriQuébec study (e.g. attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control).
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The preferences about the recruitment in the NutriQuébec study will be assessed by a questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
The preferences about the recruitment in the NutriQuébec study will be assessed by a questionnaire. The question is: By which means of communication would advertising about the NutriQuébec study be most likely to capture your attention?: 1=Television, 2=Social networks (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, etc.), 3=The Internet (other than social networks), 4=Newspapers, 5=Posters in public places (hospitals, community centres, etc.), 6=Flyers, 7=Postal mail, 8=None.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 11, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Survey

Clinical Trials on Survey

3
Subscribe