Post-stroke Pathway: Analysis and Link With One Year Sequelae in a French Cohort of Stroke Patients (PAPASéPA)

March 29, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux
The link between post-stroke pathways and patient sequelae have not yet been clearly defined. The main purpose is to identify the post-stroke life pathways components associated with sequalae at 3 months and 1 year after the acute stroke episode.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Stroke is a serious health event, involving the entire health care system and generating considerable socioeconomic weight for society. Knowledge of the components, the diversity and the scalability of post-stroke life pathways is currently not sufficient. Moreover the link between post-stroke pathways and patient sequelae have not yet been clearly defined.

The main purpose is to identify the post-stroke life pathways components associated with sequalae at 3 months and 1 year after the acute stroke episode. The secondary objectives are: 1) To define a typology of the life pathways of stroke patients, , 2) To analyze the social and geographical inequalities in the management of stroke, 4) To estimate the cost of the pathway elements of stroke management; 5) Measure the sequelae of stroke patients at three months and one year after the acute episode.

The design is a prospective multicenter cohort study with a follow up to 1 year after the acute episode, managed in several hospitals in the Aquitaine region (France).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1138

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Agen, France, 47 923
        • CH Agen
      • Blaye, France, 33 394
        • CH Blaye
      • Bordeaux, France, 33 076
        • CHU Bordeaux
      • La Teste de Buch, France, 33 164
        • CH Arcachon
      • Langon, France, 33 212
        • CH Sud Gironde - Langon
      • Lesparre-Médoc, France, 33 340
        • Clinique Mutualiste Lesparre Médoc
      • Libourne, France, 33 505
        • CH Libourne
      • Marmande, France, 47 207
        • CHIC Marmande-Tonneins
      • Mont de Marsan, France, 40 024
        • CH Mont de Marsan - site Layné
      • Oloron-Sainte-Marie, France, 64 400
        • CH Oloron
      • Orthez, France, 64 301
        • CH Orthez
      • Pau, France, 64 000
        • CH Pau
      • Villeneuve sur Lot, France, 47 305
        • Pôle de Santé du Villeneuvois

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with a confirmed ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke included in the Aquitaine Observatory of Stroke (ObA2) cohort and managed in the 13 participants centers and voluntary to participate

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient being over 18 years of age living in metropolitan France;
  • Patient with recent stroke (not before 2019) whose diagnosis confirmed by a neuro-vascular physician;
  • Patient managed for stroke in one of the 13 participating hospitals of the Aquitaine region;
  • Patient giving consent to participate to PAPASéPA;
  • Patient to be alive at the end of the acute management hospital stay

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refuse to participate to PAPASéPA
  • Patient died during the initial stay

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score
Time Frame: 3 months
Activity limitations post-stroke measure. Minimum score : 0 "No symptoms at all " Maximum score : 6 "Dead"
3 months
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score
Time Frame: 1 year
Activity limitations post-stroke measure Minimum score : 0 "no symptom" Maximum score : 6 "death"
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status Modified (TICS) Score
Time Frame: 3 months
Cognitive disorders post-stroke measure Score from 0 to 43
3 months
Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status Modified (TICS) Score
Time Frame: 1 year
Cognitive disorders post-stroke measure Score from 0 to 43
1 year
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) Score
Time Frame: 3 months

Depression and anxiety disorders post-stroke measure Scores ranged from 0 (minimum) to 21 (maximum) for anxiety and 0 (minimum) to 21 (maximum) for depression.

Total score from 0 to 42

3 months
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) Score
Time Frame: 1 year

Depression and anxiety disorders post-stroke measure Scores ranged from 0 (minimum) to 21 (maximum) for anxiety and 0 (minimum) to 21 (maximum) for depression.

Total score from 0 to 42

1 year
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score
Time Frame: 3 months

The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is designed to differentiate fatigue from clinical depression, since both share some of the same symptoms. Essentially, the FSS consists of answering a short questionaire that requires the subject to rate his or her own level of fatigue. The subject is asked to read each statem ent and circle a number from 1 to 7, depending on how appropriate they felt the statement applied to them over the preceding week. A low value indicates that the statement is not very appropriate whereas a high value indicates agreement. The scoring is done by calculating the average response to the questions (adding up all the answers and dividing by nine).

People with depression alone score about 4.5. People with fatigue average about 6.5.

3 months
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score
Time Frame: 1 year

The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is designed to differentiate fatigue from clinical depression, since both share some of the same symptoms. Essentially, the FSS consists of answering a short questionaire that requires the subject to rate his or her own level of fatigue. The subject is asked to read each statem ent and circle a number from 1 to 7, depending on how appropriate they felt the statement applied to them over the preceding week. A low value indicates that the statement is not very appropriate whereas a high value indicates agreement. The scoring is done by calculating the average response to the questions (adding up all the answers and dividing by nine).

People with depression alone score about 4.5. People with fatigue average about 6.5.

1 year
Barthel Index (BI) Score
Time Frame: 3 months

Functional outcome post-stroke measure The original 10-item form of the BI consists of 10 common ADL activities including: feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation and stair climbing. Items are rated in terms of whether individuals can perform activities independently, with some assistance, or are dependent (scored as 10, 5 or 0). Items are weighted according to the level of nursing care required.

Total score from 0 to 100

3 months
Barthel Index (BI) Score
Time Frame: 1 year

Functional outcome post-stroke measure The original 10-item form of the BI consists of 10 common ADL activities including: feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation and stair climbing. Items are rated in terms of whether individuals can perform activities independently, with some assistance, or are dependent (scored as 10, 5 or 0). Items are weighted according to the level of nursing care required.

Total score from 0 to 100

1 year
Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ-R) Score
Time Frame: 3 months
Participation restrictions post-stroke measure Score from 0 to 35
3 months
Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ-R) Score
Time Frame: 1 year
Participation restrictions post-stroke measure Score from 0 to 35
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 18, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 18, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Telephone Interview

3
Subscribe