- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03881839
Internet Tools and Emergency Attendance
Impact of "Internet Tools" Consultation on Increasing Emergency Attendance
Study Overview
Detailed Description
It is an observational study, monocentric, prospective. This study consists in collecting data from an anonymized questioner given to patients presenting themselves at the emergency department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital. Answers to the questions will not change the patient's management. The questioner, containing 17 questions, requires answering "yes" or "no" by ticking boxes, or even specify when it is stipulated. This questionnaire will be given to the patient after his registration, and filled by the latter in the waiting room, pending medical care. Answering the questionnaire will take between 5 to 10 minutes. The data is anonymous.
The patient arrives at the emergency department and registers at the entrance desks where a paper and computer file is created. Then, the Reception and Orientation Nurse takes care of the patient by welcoming him in the reception box, she realizes the taking of the hemodynamics constants, the collection of the reason of consultation with the grievances of the patient. During this phase, patient will be inform of the completion of this study and asked to participate in this study. If the patient agrees to participate, an anonymized questioner will be provided and explained by one of the investigating physicians or associated partners.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
- Recruiting
- Chu Clermont-Ferrand
-
Principal Investigator:
- Farès Moustafa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any major patient presenting to the emergency department by their personal way.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Suspicion of acute alcoholism
- dementia
- guardianship / trusteeship
- language barrier, non-communicating patient
- patient refusing to participate in the study
- patient with confusion
- patient with Glasgow scale less than 15
- patient not affiliated with social security
- patient not knowing how to read or write.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
patient in emergency department
|
The objective of this research will be to assess, in patients presenting in an emergency department, the prior consultation of medical information on a website, the impact on the emergency consultation decision and the relevance of this consultation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate of justified nature of the consultation between patient who did consult a website before the emergency room and those who didn't.
Time Frame: at day 1
|
The comparison between the justification (or not) of the transition to adult emergencies and the consultation of an upstream website will be done using the Chi2 test (or Fisher's exact test if applicable). The search for criteria related to the justified nature of this emergency procedure will be done with the Chi2 test (or Fisher's exact test if applicable) for the categorical data and with the Student's test (or Mann and Whitney test if not normally distributed) for continuous data. |
at day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Prevalence of Internet consultation among patients admitted to emergency room
Time Frame: at day 1
|
The rate of consultation of a website before the emergency room, will be expressed as a percentage with its 95% confidence interval
|
at day 1
|
The rate of justified consultation
Time Frame: at day 1
|
The rate of justified consultation to emergency department, will be expressed as a percentage with its 95% confidence interval.
|
at day 1
|
Risk factors related to consultation of a website medical information prior to the transition to adult emergencies.
Time Frame: at day 1
|
The comparison between patients who visited a medical information website (vs those who did not consult the internet) before the emergency department visit will be done using the same methods as for the analysis of the main criterion.
|
at day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Fares MOUSTAFA, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CHU-431
- 2019 / CE 06 (Other Identifier: 2019 / CE 06)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Emergency
-
Central Denmark RegionCompletedEmergency Medical Dispatch Centre | Video Streaming | Emergency Call | Prehospital Emergency Medical ServicesDenmark
-
University of AberdeenNHS Highland; Scottish Ambulance ServiceCompletedEmergency Medical Services | Emergency Service, HospitalUnited Kingdom
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalRecruiting
-
Samsung Medical CenterRecruitingEmergency Medicine | Medical Informatics | Pediatric Emergency MedicineKorea, Republic of
-
healthEworks LLCNational Institutes of Health (NIH)UnknownCompliance | Emergency Department Aftercare | Emergency Department UtilizationUnited States
-
Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinCompletedPatients Emergency On-site Care by Mobile Emergency UnitBrazil
-
Seoul National University HospitalSeoul National University Bundang HospitalRecruitingHospital Rapid Response Team | Hospital Medical Emergency Team | Medicine, EmergencyKorea, Republic of
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityNot yet recruitingCritical Illness | Emergency Medical Services | Machine Learning | Diagnosis | Emergency Service, HospitalChina
-
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois; Fondazione Bruno Kessler; Astir S.r.l. and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
-
Guangdong Provincial People's HospitalRecruiting
Clinical Trials on emergency
-
University of California, San DiegoCompleted
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalRecruiting
-
University of California, San DiegoCompleted
-
Cardiff and Vale University Health BoardNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; The Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandActive, not recruiting
-
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyCompletedEmergencies | Pancreas Disease
-
Sykehuset i Vestfold HFUniversity of South-Eastern NorwayCompletedHip Fractures | Pain, Acute | Ultrasound Therapy; ComplicationsNorway
-
University Hospital TuebingenCompleted
-
King's College LondonGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation... and other collaboratorsUnknownClinical Skills TrainingUnited Kingdom
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingEchocardiography | Acute DyspneaAustria
-
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research HospitalCompleted