An IT Approach to Implementing Depression Treatment in Cardiac Patients (iHeart DepCare)

June 11, 2025 updated by: Nathalie Moise, Columbia University

An Information tecHnology Approach to implEmenting Depression treAtment in caRdiac patienTs: [iHeartDepCare Trial]

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of a brief electronic shared decision making (eSDM) intervention on depressive symptoms in coronary heart disease patients with elevated depressive symptoms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Depression is common in patients with coronary heart disease and associated with increased cardiac morbidity and mortality. Treating depressive symptoms appears to improve depressive symptoms and quality of life. Despite expert recommendations to screen and treat depressive symptoms fewer coronary heart disease patients engage in depression treatment than the general population, perhaps due to 1) sub-optimal provider awareness and referral rates and 2) low self-efficacy, stigma and misattribution of depressive symptoms among coronary heart disease patients. In addition, few real world theory-informed implementation trials exist for improving screening and treatment in outpatient settings.

The specific aim is to determine whether an electronic shared decision making (eSDM) and behavioral activation tool improves depressive symptoms and treatment initiation in coronary heart disease patients with elevated depressive symptoms. To accomplish these aims, a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial will be conducted using a pre-post design across socioeconomically diverse cardiology and primary care clinics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

361

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of coronary heart disease
  • English or Spanish Speaking
  • Elevated Depressive symptoms (PHQ9 ≥10)
  • Appointment at participating cardiology or primary care clinics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under the care of a psychiatrist [**On 6/22/2022, this exclusion criteria was removed for those clusters of clinics not already in the post-implementation period**]
  • Diagnosis/history of psychosis or schizophrenia
  • Diagnosis/history of bipolar disorder
  • Attempted suicide
  • Non-English or Spanish speaking
  • Dementia or severe cognitive impairment
  • Non-elevated depressive symptoms
  • Alcohol or substance abuse
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Electronic shared decision making (eSDM) Tool

In the pre-intervention period, patients in clinic clusters will receive usual care.

When a clinic cluster's randomly allotted intervention period arrives, coronary heart disease patients in that given clinic cluster will complete a web application, which delivers screening, behavioral activation and shared decision making (eSDM), and providers will receive education and a patient preference report generated from the application.

During both the pre and post intervention periods, patients will be assessed at baseline and 6 month follow up.

The web application includes depression screening, behavioral activation, and a patient preference driven treatment selection decision aid. Treatment options will include medications, cardiac rehab/exercise program, and therapy. In addition to education, providers will receive a patient preference report in real time with options for coordination of care
Other Names:
  • eSDM intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Depression Index (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Baseline, Follow-up visit (approximately 6 months)
Change in total BDI (21-item measure of depressive symptoms [0-63]; higher score constitutes worse burden of symptoms) from baseline to follow visit during the pre-intervention period compared to post-intervention period
Baseline, Follow-up visit (approximately 6 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who initiate treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Follow-up visit (approximately 6 months)
Proportion of enrolled patients who initiate any depression treatment (medications, cardiac rehab/exercise program, therapy) from baseline to follow up visit in the pre-intervention compared to post-intervention period
Baseline, Follow-up visit (approximately 6 months)
Mean Patient Activation
Time Frame: Baseline
Mean baseline patient activation measure [PAM] (13-items, range 0-100, higher score indicates greater activation] in the pre-intervention compared to post-intervention period
Baseline
Mean Decisional Conflict Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
Mean decisional conflict (measures personal perceptions of uncertainty around choosing among treatment option, 10 items, range 0-100, higher score indicates greater conflict) of patients.
Baseline
Mean change in quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, Follow-up visit (approximately 6 months)
Change in QoL from from baseline to follow up visit in the pre-intervention compared to post-intervention period
Baseline, Follow-up visit (approximately 6 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nathalie Moise, MD, MS, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 23, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Electronic shared decision making (eSDM) tool

Subscribe