Early Withdrawal Exposure and Negative Affect Withdrawal (NAW) Regulation Training for Smoking Cessation

December 7, 2023 updated by: Peter Hendricks, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Smoking remains the single most preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, accounting for approximately half a million deaths every year. The current study will investigate the efficacy and mechanisms of change of a novel smoking cessation intervention. The current study will thus provide essential information regarding a treatment that has the potential to enhance the efficacy of existing smoking cessation interventions, thereby having a beneficial impact on the public health of the United States.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cigarette smoking remains the single most preventable cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States. Long-term abstinence rates for even the most rigorous of smoking cessation treatments range between 20% and 35%. It is therefore essential that research continue to investigate novel smoking cessation interventions. Leading contemporary theories of addiction motivation posit that the escape or avoidance of negative affect withdrawal (NAW) symptoms (e.g., anger, anxiety, and depression/sadness) constitutes a strong motivational basis for cigarette smoking and plays a critical role in relapse to cigarette use. However, whereas NAW symptoms appear to exert a powerful influence on smoking cessation treatment outcome, smoking cessation interventions may exert only modest effects on NAW symptoms. Accordingly, it has been proposed that smoking cessation interventions may be augmented by aiding smokers in the practice of NAW regulation strategies. The primary goal of this investigation is to evaluate an early withdrawal exposure plus NAW regulation training intervention for smoking cessation. Specific aims include evaluating the efficacy of the treatment components and investigating potential mediators and moderators of the treatment components. Participants will be adult smokers (N = 400) of at least 5 cigarettes per day with the intention to quit smoking. Using a factorial design, participants will be randomized to early withdrawal exposure (yes vs. no) and behavioral intervention (NAW regulation training vs. relaxation control training), resulting in four distinct conditions. The investigator's primary hypothesis is that early withdrawal exposure plus NAW regulation training will produce higher rates of seven-day point-prevalence abstinence at 1, 3, and 6 months after end-of-treatment, suggesting a synergistic (i.e., non-additive) effect of the two intervention components. Mediators (e.g., in-session withdrawal symptoms) and moderators (e.g., demographic characteristics, tobacco dependence) will be investigated via established analyses. These data will advance the experimental intervention with a focus on targeting mechanisms of change as well as participant characteristics to which the intervention may be tailored. The experimental intervention described in the current proposal has the potential to ultimately enhance the efficacy of existing smoking cessation interventions and will therefore contribute uniquely to the field.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Recruiting
        • Ryals Public Health Building
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Peter S Hendricks, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years of age
  • smoke at least 5 cigarettes per day
  • Expired breath carbon monoxide (CO) reading of at least five parts per million
  • report the intention to quit
  • reside in the Birmingham area with no plan to relocate outside of the area in the next 6 months
  • access to a telephone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to speak English
  • presence of a condition that contraindicates use of the nicotine patch
  • presence of conditions that might interfere with compliance with the protocol or greatly complicate treatment
  • any acutely life-threatening disease
  • concurrent participation in a formal treatment program for smoking cessation
  • current use of any pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early Withdrawal Exposure plus NAW Regulation Training
The development, application, modification, and repeated practice of individualized withdrawal regulation strategies (e.g., behavioral and cognitive strategies for allaying withdrawal symptoms) across the first 4 hours of abstinence over 4 separate sessions.
Participants will generate and refine individualized withdrawal regulation strategies with the aid of a therapist
Exposure to the first 4 hours of abstinence across 4 separate sessions
Active Comparator: Early Withdrawal Exposure plus Relaxation Control Training
The development, application, modification, and repeated practice of relaxation strategies across the first 4 hours of abstinence over 4 separate sessions.
Exposure to the first 4 hours of abstinence across 4 separate sessions
Participants will generate and refine relaxation techniques with the aid of a therapist
Active Comparator: NAW Regulation Training Only
The development, application, modification, and repeated practice of individualized withdrawal regulation strategies (e.g., behavioral and cognitive strategies for allaying withdrawal symptoms) over 4 separate sessions involving smoking as usual.
Participants will generate and refine individualized withdrawal regulation strategies with the aid of a therapist
Active Comparator: Relaxation Control Training Only
The development, application, modification, and repeated practice of relaxation strategies over 4 separate sessions involving smoking as usual.
Participants will generate and refine relaxation techniques with the aid of a therapist

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Smoking cessation as evaluated by self-reported, biochemically-confirmed seven-day point-prevalence abstinence
Time Frame: 1 month after end-of-treatment
Self reported abstinence from smoking ("no smoking, not even a puff) in the past seven days, biochemically confirmed by a breath carbon monoxide reading of 3 or less
1 month after end-of-treatment
Smoking cessation as evaluated by self-reported, biochemically-confirmed seven-day point-prevalence abstinence
Time Frame: 3 months after end-of-treatment
Self reported abstinence from smoking ("no smoking, not even a puff) in the past seven days, biochemically confirmed by a breath carbon monoxide reading of 3 or less
3 months after end-of-treatment
Smoking cessation as evaluated by self-reported, biochemically-confirmed seven-day point-prevalence abstinence
Time Frame: 6 months after end-of-treatment
Self reported abstinence from smoking ("no smoking, not even a puff) in the past seven days, biochemically confirmed by a breath carbon monoxide reading of 3 or less
6 months after end-of-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cessation milestones as determined by the Timeline Followback Interview
Time Frame: 1 month after end-of-treatment
1) Was initial abstinence achieved (was there any day of non-smoking within the first two weeks after the quit date; yes or no)?; 2) latency to lapse (number of days to the first cigarette after the quit day); 3) was there a progression from lapse to relapse (defined as seven consecutive days of smoking; yes or no)?
1 month after end-of-treatment
Cessation milestones as determined by the Timeline Followback Interview
Time Frame: 3 months after end-of-treatment
1) latency to lapse (number of days to the first cigarette after the quit day); 2) was there a progression from lapse to relapse (defined as seven consecutive days of smoking; yes or no)?
3 months after end-of-treatment
Cessation milestones as determined by the Timeline Followback Interview
Time Frame: 6 months after end-of-treatment
1) latency to lapse (number of days to the first cigarette after the quit day); 2) was there a progression from lapse to relapse (defined as seven consecutive days of smoking; yes or no)?
6 months after end-of-treatment
Physical tobacco dependence
Time Frame: 1 month after end-of-treatment
Tobacco dependence as measured by the Fagerstrom Test of Cigarette Dependence (FTCD). The FTCD is a widely used 9-item measure of physical dependence. FTCD scores, computed from the sum of the items, range from 0 to 10, with greater scores indicating greater dependence.
1 month after end-of-treatment
Physical tobacco dependence
Time Frame: 3 months after end-of-treatment
Tobacco dependence as measured by the Fagerstrom Test of Cigarette Dependence (FTCD). The FTCD is a widely used 9-item measure of physical dependence. FTCD scores, computed from the sum of the items, range from 0 to 10, with greater scores indicating greater dependence.
3 months after end-of-treatment
Physical tobacco dependence
Time Frame: 6 months after end-of-treatment
Tobacco dependence as measured by the Fagerstrom Test of Cigarette Dependence (FTCD). The FTCD is a widely used 9-item measure of physical dependence. FTCD scores, computed from the sum of the items, range from 0 to 10, with greater scores indicating greater dependence.
6 months after end-of-treatment
Motivational tobacco dependence
Time Frame: 1 month after end-of-treatment
Tobacco dependence as measured by the and the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM) questionnaire. The WISDM-68 is a 68-item measure designed to assess dependence as a motivational state on 13 subscales: Affiliative Attachment, Automaticity, Loss of Control, Behavioral Choice, Cognitive Enhancement, Craving, Cue Exposure, Negative Reinforcement, Positive Reinforcement, Social and Environmental Goads, Taste and Sensory Properties, Tolerance, and Weight Control. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 1 to 7, with greater scores indicating greater dependence.
1 month after end-of-treatment
Motivational tobacco dependence
Time Frame: 3 months after end-of-treatment
Tobacco dependence as measured by the and the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM) questionnaire. The WISDM-68 is a 68-item measure designed to assess dependence as a motivational state on 13 subscales: Affiliative Attachment, Automaticity, Loss of Control, Behavioral Choice, Cognitive Enhancement, Craving, Cue Exposure, Negative Reinforcement, Positive Reinforcement, Social and Environmental Goads, Taste and Sensory Properties, Tolerance, and Weight Control. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 1 to 7, with greater scores indicating greater dependence.
3 months after end-of-treatment
Motivational tobacco dependence
Time Frame: 6 months after end-of-treatment
Tobacco dependence as measured by the and the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM) questionnaire. The WISDM-68 is a 68-item measure designed to assess dependence as a motivational state on 13 subscales: Affiliative Attachment, Automaticity, Loss of Control, Behavioral Choice, Cognitive Enhancement, Craving, Cue Exposure, Negative Reinforcement, Positive Reinforcement, Social and Environmental Goads, Taste and Sensory Properties, Tolerance, and Weight Control. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 1 to 7, with greater scores indicating greater dependence.
6 months after end-of-treatment
Withdrawal symptoms
Time Frame: 1 month after end-of-treatment
Withdrawal symptoms as measured by the 28-item Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS). The WSWS measures smoking withdrawal symptoms on 7 subscales: Anger, Anxiety, Concentration, Craving, Hunger, Sadness, and Sleep Difficulty. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 0 to 4, with greater scores indicating greater withdrawal.
1 month after end-of-treatment
Withdrawal symptoms
Time Frame: 3 months after end-of-treatment
Withdrawal symptoms as measured by the 28-item Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS). The WSWS measures smoking withdrawal symptoms on 7 subscales: Anger, Anxiety, Concentration, Craving, Hunger, Sadness, and Sleep Difficulty. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 0 to 4, with greater scores indicating greater withdrawal.
3 months after end-of-treatment
Withdrawal symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months after end-of-treatment
Withdrawal symptoms as measured by the 28-item Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS). The WSWS measures smoking withdrawal symptoms on 7 subscales: Anger, Anxiety, Concentration, Craving, Hunger, Sadness, and Sleep Difficulty. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 0 to 4, with greater scores indicating greater withdrawal.
6 months after end-of-treatment
Abstinence-related expectancies
Time Frame: 1 month after end-of-treatment
Abstinence-related expectancies as measured by the 55-items Smoking Abstinence Questionnaire (SAQ). The SAQ measures expectancies for abstinence from smoking on 10 subscales: Withdrawal, Social Improvement/Non-smoker Identity, Adverse Outcomes, Treatment Effectiveness, Common Reasons, Barriers to Treatment, Social Support, Optimistic Outcomes, Coffee Use, and Weight Gain. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 0 to 6, with greater scores reflecting stronger expectancies.
1 month after end-of-treatment
Abstinence-related expectancies
Time Frame: 3 months after end-of-treatment
Abstinence-related expectancies as measured by the 55-item Smoking Abstinence Questionnaire (SAQ). The SAQ measures expectancies for abstinence from smoking on 10 subscales: Withdrawal, Social Improvement/Non-smoker Identity, Adverse Outcomes, Treatment Effectiveness, Common Reasons, Barriers to Treatment, Social Support, Optimistic Outcomes, Coffee Use, and Weight Gain. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 0 to 6, with greater scores reflecting stronger expectancies.
3 months after end-of-treatment
Abstinence-related expectancies
Time Frame: 6 months after end-of-treatment
Abstinence-related expectancies as measured by the 55-item Smoking Abstinence Questionnaire (SAQ). The SAQ measures expectancies for abstinence from smoking on 10 subscales: Withdrawal, Social Improvement/Non-smoker Identity, Adverse Outcomes, Treatment Effectiveness, Common Reasons, Barriers to Treatment, Social Support, Optimistic Outcomes, Coffee Use, and Weight Gain. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 0 to 6, with greater scores reflecting stronger expectancies.
6 months after end-of-treatment
Thoughts about abstinence
Time Frame: 1 month after end-of-treatment
Motivation to quit, expected difficulty quitting, and confidence in one's ability to quit are measured by one item each by the Thoughts About Abstinence (TAA) questionnaire. Scores on each item range from 1 to 10, with greater scores indicating greater motivation to quit, expected difficulty quitting, and confidence in one's ability to quit, respectively.
1 month after end-of-treatment
Thoughts about abstinence
Time Frame: 3 months after end-of-treatment
Motivation to quit, expected difficulty quitting, and confidence in one's ability to quit are measured by one item each by the Thoughts About Abstinence (TAA) questionnaire. Scores on each item range from 1 to 10, with greater scores indicating greater motivation to quit, expected difficulty quitting, and confidence in one's ability to quit, respectively.
3 months after end-of-treatment
Thoughts about abstinence
Time Frame: 6 months after end-of-treatment
Motivation to quit, expected difficulty quitting, and confidence in one's ability to quit are measured by one item each by the Thoughts About Abstinence (TAA) questionnaire. Scores on each item range from 1 to 10, with greater scores indicating greater motivation to quit, expected difficulty quitting, and confidence in one's ability to quit, respectively.
6 months after end-of-treatment
Intolerance for smoking abstinence discomfort
Time Frame: 1 month after end-of-treatment
Intolerance for smoking abstinence discomfort, as measured by the 17-tem Intolerance for Smoking Abstinence Discomfort Questionnaire (IDQ-S). The IDQ-S assesses the inability to tolerate smoking abstinence discomfort on two subscales: Withdrawal Intolerance and Lack of Cognitive Coping. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 1 to 5, with greater scores indicating greater inability to tolerate abstinence.
1 month after end-of-treatment
Intolerance for smoking abstinence discomfort
Time Frame: 3 months after end-of-treatment
Intolerance for smoking abstinence discomfort, as measured by the 17-item Intolerance for Smoking Abstinence Discomfort Questionnaire (IDQ-S). The IDQ-S assesses the inability to tolerate smoking abstinence discomfort on two subscales: Withdrawal Intolerance and Lack of Cognitive Coping. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 1 to 5, with greater scores indicating greater inability to tolerate abstinence.
3 months after end-of-treatment
Intolerance for smoking abstinence discomfort
Time Frame: 6 months after end-of-treatment
Intolerance for smoking abstinence discomfort, as measured by the 17-item Intolerance for Smoking Abstinence Discomfort Questionnaire (IDQ-S). The IDQ-S assesses the inability to tolerate smoking abstinence discomfort on two subscales: Withdrawal Intolerance and Lack of Cognitive Coping. Scores on each subscale, computed from the mean of their respective items, range from 1 to 5, with greater scores indicating greater inability to tolerate abstinence.
6 months after end-of-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 000522656

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tobacco Dependence

Clinical Trials on cognitive-behavioral withdrawal regulation strategies

3
Subscribe