The Effectiveness of a Relaxation Technique on the Quality of Life and Symptoms in People Living With HIV

September 9, 2019 updated by: Université de Montréal
Quality of life of people living with HIV is strongly affected by the presence of one or more symptoms, such as sleep problems, fatigue, muscle pain, anxiety and depressive symptoms. Autogenic training has shown positive effects on these symptoms in different populations, but there is very little evidence on the effects of this relaxation technique in people living with HIV.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aim of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a relaxation technique, autogenic training, on the quality of life and the physical and psychological symptoms in people living with HIV.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H2W1T8
        • CHUM
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4A3J1
        • CUSM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being older than 18 ;
  • have a diagnosis of HIV;
  • present at least one of the following symptoms during the preceding two weeks: sleep problems, fatigue, pain, anxiety or symptoms of depression;
  • understand and speak French and;
  • be able to follow the instructions to learn the relaxation technique.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: autogenic training
Autogenic training
autogenic training
EXPERIMENTAL: wait list
usual care for 6 months Autogenic training after 6 months
autogenic training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Outcomes Quality of Life-human immunodeficiency virus (PROQOL-HIV)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
The PROQOL-HIV questionnaire is composed of 43 Likert-type items (5-point scale ranging from 0=never to 4=always), including 39 items targeting 8 domains of HRQL and general health: physical health and symptoms (9 items), treatment impact (10 items), emotional distress (4 items), health concerns (4 items), body change (4 items), intimate relationships (3 items), social relationships (2 items), and stigma (2 items). Four extra items dealing with religious beliefs, finance, having children, and satisfaction with care are not part of the scoring scheme, but are used to gather additional information from the respondent. Responses to items will be totaled for each dimension and standardized on a scale from 0 to 100 points, in which higher values indicate a better health state.
3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and quantity. The19-item self-report questionnaire yields 7 component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction each weighted equally on a 0-3 scale. The seven component scores are then summed to yield a global PSQI score, which has a range of 0-21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
3 and 6 months
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
Fatigue severity scale (FSS) is a 9-items instrument with seven items related to fatigue interference, one item related to the experience of fatigue itself and one item about what causes fatigue. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (''strongly disagree'') to 7 (''strongly agree''). The mean score of the 9 items is used to estimate fatigue severity.
3 and 6 months
Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a two-factor instrument that measures pain severity and pain interference. The pain severity factor has four items, all rated on a 0 ''No pain'' to 10 ''Pain as bad as you can imagine'' Likert scale. The pain interference factor has seven items, all rated on a 0 ''Does not interfere'' to 10 ''Interferes completely'' Likert scale. Arithmetic mean of the four severity items can be used as measures of pain severity; the arithmetic mean of the seven interference items can be used as a measure of pain interference
3 and 6 months
State -Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a 40-items instrument that measures state anxiety and trait anxiety. Each type of anxiety has its own scale of 20 different questions that are scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 "Almost never" to 4 "Almost always". Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores correlating with greater anxiety.
3 and 6 months
PHQ-9
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item instrument that measure depressive symptoms severity. PhQ-9 score ranges from 0 to 27, because each of the 9 items can be scores from 0 "not at all" to 3 "nearly every day". Higher scores indicate higher severity.
3 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pilar Ramirez-Garcia, PhD, Université de Montréal

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-5940:PRG

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on autogenic training

3
Subscribe