Comparing Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks With Ceramic Blocks in Indirect Restorations 2. Protocol Registration:

April 22, 2019 updated by: Hamsa Ashraf Abd El Menam, Cairo University

One-year Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restorations Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth (Randomized Clinical Trial)

comparing nano hybrid composite blocks grandio blocks (VOCO) with ceramic blocks (Emax) in indirect restorations using modified USPH criteria (marginal integrity) to see if there will be a significant different between two blocks

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ceramic restorations are well - thought- out an excellent option to restore posterior teeth were esthetics is required and the size of the cavity preparation has surpassed the conventional for direct resin composites , Ceramic systems can syndicate esthetics with wear resistance , being considered a consistent treatment of choice ,peutzfeld evaluated , the failure rate of different restorative materials used in posterior teeth and stated that gold inlays didnt present a much lower failure rate than ceramic or composite inlays, consequently , the author suggested that other aspects besides longevity , such as esthetics , charge and number of visits should also be considered when relating treatment options

Different ceramic systems for constructing inlays and onlays restorations are available in the market, some of the ceramic restorations are made using feldspathic ceramic , the Cerec computer aided design/computer -aided manufacturing, CAD/CAM system or the hot-pressed leucite -reinforced ceramic fabricated by the conventional lost wax technique , other systems that employ alumina are available , there are three types of materials available for the dentist (glass ceramics /ceramics)resin hybrid ceramics and composite blocks Advantages of ceramic restortations are improved because of their increased translucency and light transmission ,Another advantage embraces minimal tooth reduction compared with metal ceramics , minimal thermal conductivity , they have desirable properties including their physical and mechanical properties , outstanding biocompatbility to periodontal tissues and less susceptibility to metal allergies though ceramic blocks will cause wear of opposing natural teeth ,expensive , that's why we have to shift to another material resin composite Resin composite materials have been quickly developed in the last few years , direct resin composite restorations become the gold standard for restoring intra coronal cavities , while for the extra coronal cavities , the indirect resin composite onlays be inclined to replace metallic restorations in most situations being more esthetics and conservative with lower cost.

One of the break throughs in resin composite technology is the evolution of the new resin composite blocks (Grandio blocks ) merits of grandio blocks the highest fillers content ( 86% by weight)resembles natural teeth perfectly , excellent physical values for flexural strength and abrasion , no firing required (a real one step), can be processed using any conventional milling unit , can be polished and repaired optimally , Ideal for grinding even incases with thin edges and its based on the nano hybrid technology .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Cairo University
        • Contact:
          • omar MO shallan, phd
          • Phone Number: 01122665661

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with badly broken vital teeth

good oral hygiene measures

young adults males or females

cooperative patients approving to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with compromised medical history

lack of compliance

severe medical condition

severe or active periodontal disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Grandio blocks
Nano hybrid composite blocks
nano hybrid composite blocks
ceramic blocks
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: E max
ceramic blocks
nano hybrid composite blocks
ceramic blocks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
marginal integrity
Time Frame: one year
Modified USPH criteria
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: shereen MO Hafez, phd, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPER-607

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on grandio blocks

Subscribe