Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Median Nerve in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

May 1, 2019 updated by: Ahmed Abdelalim, Cairo University

A Study of Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Median Nerve in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

This study is a diagnostic accuracy study that aims to evaluate the role of DTI in evaluation of DPN in comparison to clinical scores and nerve conduction studies (NCS). The study included 30 patients with diabetes mellitus complaining of neuropathy symptoms and 15 healthy volunteers. All subjects underwent evaluation using 1.5T DTI of median nerves and NCS. Patients underwent clinical evaluation using Neuropathy Deficit Score (NDS), Neuropathy Impairment Score in the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) and Diabetic Neuropathy Examination (DNE) score. The values of these tests were compared and correlated and diagnostic accuracy tests were performed together with identification of cut-off score for abnormal diffusion tensor imaging parameters in diabetic neuropathy

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11562
        • Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study is a case-control study of 30 Egyptian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complaining of symptoms suggestive of peripheral neuropathy including 12 males and 18 females with a mean of 50.90 ± 9.18 years and 15 normal healthy Egyptian volunteers including10 males and 5 females with a mean age of 45.67±7.77 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetic patients with symptoms suggestive of peripheral neuropathy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with evidence of nerve entrapment or neuropathy due to causes other than DM

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Diabetic Neuropathy
Thirty Egyptian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complaining of symptoms suggestive of peripheral neuropathy including 12 males and 18 females with a mean of 50.90 ± 9.18.
All subjects underwent evaluation using 1.5T DTI of median nerves and NCS. Patients underwent clinical evaluation using Neuropathy Deficit Score (NDS), Neuropathy Impairment Score in the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) and Diabetic Neuropathy Examination (DNE) score.
Other Names:
  • Nerve conduction studies
  • Neuropathy clinical scores
Healthy Control Subjects
Fifteen normal healthy Egyptian volunteers including10 males and 5 females with a mean age of 45.67±7.77 years.
All subjects underwent evaluation using 1.5T DTI of median nerves and NCS. Patients underwent clinical evaluation using Neuropathy Deficit Score (NDS), Neuropathy Impairment Score in the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) and Diabetic Neuropathy Examination (DNE) score.
Other Names:
  • Nerve conduction studies
  • Neuropathy clinical scores

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Diffusion tensor imaging in comparison to nerve conduction velocity
Time Frame: Six Months
This is a diagnostic accuracy study comparing the ability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging to diagnose Diabetic neuropathy. This is performed in comparison to nerve conduction studies which is a well established quantitative and qualitative diagnostic test that measures nerve conduction velocity in meter/second.
Six Months
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Diffusion tensor imaging of peripheral nerves in comparison to motor amplitude in diabetic patients.
Time Frame: Six Months
This is a diagnostic accuracy study comparing the ability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging to diagnose Diabetic neuropathy. This is performed in comparison to nerve conduction studies which is a well established quantitative and qualitative diagnostic test that measures motor amplitude in millivolt.
Six Months
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Diffusion tensor imaging of peripheral nerves in comparison to sensory amplitude in diabetic patients.
Time Frame: Six Months
This is a diagnostic accuracy study comparing the ability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging to diagnose Diabetic neuropathy. This is performed in comparison to nerve conduction studies which is a well established quantitative and qualitative diagnostic test that measures sensory amplitude in microvolt.
Six Months
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Diffusion tensor imaging of peripheral nerves in comparison to Neuropathy Deficit Score in diabetic patients.
Time Frame: Six Months
This is a diagnostic accuracy study comparing the ability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging to diagnose Diabetic neuropathy in comparison to Neuropathy Deficit Score which examines vibration, sensation (0 if present and normal and 1 if absent reduced or uncertain) and ankle reflex (0 if present and normal, and 2 if absent) with a maximum total score of 10. The grades of severity are mild (3-5) moderate (6-8) and severe (9-10).
Six Months
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Diffusion tensor imaging of peripheral nerves in comparison to Neuropathy Impairment Score in diabetic patients.
Time Frame: Six Months
This is a diagnostic accuracy study comparing the ability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging to diagnose Diabetic neuropathy in comparison to Neuropathy Impairment Score in the Lower Limbs which evaluates the changes in motor, sensory and reflex activity. The scale ranges from the normal value at "0" points, with a maximum value of 88 points.
Six Months
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Diffusion tensor imaging of peripheral nerves in comparison to Diabetic Neuropathy Examination in diabetic patients.
Time Frame: Six Months
This is a diagnostic accuracy study comparing the ability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging to diagnose Diabetic neuropathy in comparison to Diabetic Neuropathy Examination score which tests only the limbs of right side with a maximum score of 16 points. A score, greater than three, is considered abnormal.
Six Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identifying cut-off value for abnormal diffusion tensor fractional anisotropy in diabetic neuropathy.
Time Frame: Six months
This study aims to identify cut-off absolute value of fractional anisotropy that is considered abnormal in diabetic neuropathy. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a scalar value between zero and one that describes the degree of anisotropy of a diffusion process. A value of zero means that diffusion is isotropic, i.e. it is unrestricted (or equally restricted) in all directions. A value of one means that diffusion occurs only along one axis and is fully restricted along all other directions.
Six months
Identifying cut-off value for abnormal diffusion tensor apparent diffusion coefficient in diabetic neuropathy.
Time Frame: Six months
This study aims to identify cut-off absolute value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) that is considered abnormal in diabetic neuropathy. An ADC of a tissue is expressed in units of mm2/s. There is no unanimity regarding the boundaries of the range of normal diffusion, but ADC values less than 1.0 to 1.1 x 10-3 mm2/s (or 1000-1100 x 10-6 mm2/s) are generally acknowledged in adults as indicating restriction.
Six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ahmed Abdelalim, MD, Department of Neurology, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Clinical Trials on Diffusion tensor imaging of peripheral nerves

3
Subscribe