Strength Training and Quality of Life in Elderly (ST-QOL)

July 15, 2020 updated by: Juan F. Lisón Párraga, Dr, Cardenal Herrera University

Effects of Different Strength Training Programs on Quality of Life in Elderly

Aim: To evaluate the impact of three different strength training programs on psychological wellbeing of elderly.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Physical activity in the elderly has benefits which improve psychological wellbeing. However, the majority of older adults perform less physical activity with advancing age.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of three different 32-week strength training programs (low, moderate and high intensity) on psychological wellbeing of elderly.

Design: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Valencia
      • Moncada, Valencia, Spain, 46113
        • Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥60 years;
  • having the ability to speak and write in Spanish;
  • having the ability to complete the questionnaires independently.

Exclusion Criteria:

-the presence of any medical problem or pathology that could hinder physical activity practice

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
No intervention
Experimental: Experimental-Low Intensity Strength Training
Strength training (low intensity)
Strength training
Experimental: Experimental-Moderate Intensity Strength Training
Strength training (moderate intensity)
Strength training
Experimental: Experimental-High Intensity Strength Training
Strength training (high intensity)
Strength training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life, assessed through the Short Form 36 health survey questionnaire.
Time Frame: 32 weeks
This questionnaire measures quality of live. It provides information on 8 scales, scoring from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health), and on the physical component scale (PCS) and the mental component scale (MCS), normalized scores representing overall physical and mental functioning.
32 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotional wellbeing, assessed through the STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) questionnaire.
Time Frame: 32 weeks
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a commonly used measure of trait and state anxiety (Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Vagg, & Jacobs, 1983). It can be used in clinical settings to diagnose anxiety and to distinguish it from depressive syndromes. It also is often used in research as an indicator of caregiver distress. STAI has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
32 weeks
Motivation towards physical activity, assessed through the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
Time Frame: 32 weeks
This questionnaire consists of 19 items measuring stages on the continuum of self-determination. It measures external regulation (4 items), introjected regulation (3 items), identified regulation (4 items), intrinsic regulation (4 items), and it adds amotivation (4 items) on a scale from 1 (Not at all true for me) to 5 (Absolutely true for me). Each of the subscales has a maximum score, with a maximum of 20 for external regulation, identified regulation, intrinsic regulation and amotivation, and 15 for introjected regulation.
32 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: JF Lisón, PhD, Cardenal Herrera University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UNIVERSITY CARDENAL HERRERA-19

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Strength training

Subscribe