Strengthening in Functional Mobility of Active Elderly

December 27, 2016 updated by: Lislei Jorge Patrizzi

Influence of a Strengthening Exercise Program for Lower Limbs in Functional Mobility From Irregularly Active Elderly

Aging is characterized by functional losses among which, the related to mobility and balance may be highlighted. Regular physical activity, including muscle strengthening exercises, is beneficial to a healthy elderly. Thus, this study aimed to verify the influence of 8 weeks-program of lower limbs strengthening exercises in the balance and functional mobility of physically active elderly. The investigators evaluated 18 women, with ages between 61 and 80 years. Balance assessment was performed using the Functional Reach Test (FRT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Romberg test in stable or unstable soil. For muscular strengthening of the lower limbs, the workload was determined by the strength reached in the eight-repetition maximum test (8RM), applying progressive load increments between training sessions conducted (50% , 60% , 70% of 8RM), with the muscle strength being reevaluated in the fourth week of training, with subsequent adjustment of the load for the subsequent training. The training took place in two weekly meetings, in 40-minute sessions, during eight weeks. Data were analyzed using the paired-t test and ANOVA with repeated measures. Among 18 evaluated elderly women, 7 completed the 8 week training proposed. Decrease in TUG time (p = 0,035) and statistically significant increase in muscle strength were observed in all muscle groups trained (quadriceps, hamstrings, adductors and abductors). FRT (p = 0.170) was not significantly different after training. Therefore, strength training proposed was efficient in improving muscle strength in the lower limbs of irregular physically active elderly, impacting positively on functional gain gait. However, the gain in muscle strength was not enough to generate significant results in static balance probably due to the type of exercise performed as well as due being limited to muscle groups of the lower limbs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minas Gerais
      • Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 38022200
        • Lislei Jorge Patrizzi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

61 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged between 61 and 80
  • irregularly active (IPAQ)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of one or more of the following conditions: neurological diseases, impaired cognitive autonomy or limited self-determination capacity, limiting orthopedic injury, orthoses for lower limb, hip or knee prosthesis, the cardiorespiratory system diseases or any kind of commitment that prevented the permanence in the standing position.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Muscle strength
Evaluate the effects of a eight weeks program of strengthening exercise on balance and functional mobility in irregular active elderly women

Strength training The strength training for lower limbs muscles occurred twice a week, 40 minutes per session for eight consecutive weeks.

n the first two weeks of training, each elderly performed the exercises with 50% of its load defined in 8RM test, increasing to 60 and 70% of the load in the third and fourth subsequent weeks, respectively. After this period, a new evaluation by 8RM strength test was conducted, adopting the fifth and sixth weeks of training 50% of value of the new load defined in 8RM test and to finalize the program in seventh and eighth weeks applied, respectively, 60% and 70% of the new charge. The exercises were performed for the quadriceps, hamstrings, muscles adductor and abductor hip.

Other Names:
  • Resistance Training
  • Strength Training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional mobility
Time Frame: The results were obtained at the end of the eight weeks of intervention

The TUG allows a quantitative assessment of gait and mobility, enabling the investigation of the effects of a particular intervention on these parameters (Van Iersel et al., 2008). The TUG is a sensitive test, is a good option of choice to be used as the primary outcome measure in clinical trials to improve gait and mobility (Van Iersel et al., 2008). It allows the researcher to observe the sitting balance of transfers from sitting to standing position and vice versa, as well as stability while walking and walking course changes.

For the application of TUG has asked the elderly up from a chair without armrest from the recumbent position, wander around a distance of 3 meters safely and quickly, turn, return on the same route and the chair again with the back supported on back. Performance was assessed by timing the time required for the completion of the test. The time taken for the test is determining the risk for falls, classified as low, when the time spent on the test is less than

The results were obtained at the end of the eight weeks of intervention
Risk of falls and Balance
Time Frame: The results were obtained at the end of the eight weeks of intervention
To the risk of falls in the elderly, the Romberg test is an effective method, since its completion provides anteroposterior instability or increased body sway. For this test, in the standing position the participants remained with the feet together, aligned head and arms along the body. Then, it was requested that, keeping the position described, the participants close their eyes for a period of 30 seconds. Later, the same test was repeated, but on shaky ground when the participant was left standing position on a foam surface, requesting again the closing of the eyes. A procedure again observing the imbalance with time record in seconds, before its occurrence.
The results were obtained at the end of the eight weeks of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle strength
Time Frame: The results were obtained at the end of the eight weeks of intervention
To evaluate muscle strength and determination of the optimal load training to strengthen the lower limbs the investigators used the strength test eight maximum repetitions (8RM) for each proposed exercise. The 8RM test corresponded to the maximum load that could be raised by the participants throughout the normal range of motion, maintaining the proper technique in eight repetitions (Canuto et al., 2011). Before starting the test was performed 8RM heating with 10 repetitions without any charge to the motion that would run the test and after two minutes the test was started. The materials used were shinguards 0.5 kg to 5 kg.
The results were obtained at the end of the eight weeks of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEP UFTM 1480

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aged

Clinical Trials on Muscle strength

3
Subscribe