Preventing Drug Abuse Among Sexual Minority Youth

February 8, 2024 updated by: Traci M. Schwinn, Columbia University

Preventing Drug Abuse Among Sexual-Minority Youth

The planned randomized clinical trial will longitudinally test a tailored, web-based drug abuse prevention program with a nationwide sample of 15- to 17-year-old sexual minority youth (youth who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or unsure of their sexual orientation).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The randomized controlled trial will include at least 890 sexual-minority youth from the United States. Study participants will be 15- to 17-year-old youth recruited from Facebook/Instagram. All youth will complete pretest measures online. Intervention-arm youth will then interact with the 9-session program; youth in the control arm will have access to an attention-placebo website. All youth will then complete posttest measures (immediately following intervention completion and estimated to be approximately 5 months after study onset) and 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up measures.

Across posttest and annual follow-up measurement occasions, data analyses will examine rates of 30-day drug use between study arms. The investigators will also examine intervention effects on mediator variables associated with drug use and assess the extent to which changes in mediator variables explain differences in drug use between arms.

Youth assigned to the intervention arm will have access to 9 intervention sessions delivered online. The sessions will be housed on a website with entertainment features youth seek: life hacks, features on LGBTQ leaders, fortunes, horoscopes, inspiring quotes, and health-related resources.

To ensure that youths' expectations for study participation are equivalent across arms and to account for the non-active components of the experimental intervention, the investigators designed the attention-placebo arm. Youth assigned to the attention-placebo arm will have access to the website with entertainment features: life hacks, features on LGBTQ leaders, fortunes, horoscopes, inspiring quotes, and health-related resources.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1216

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • teenagers between the ages of 15-17 years old
  • identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or unsure of sexual orientation
  • speak and read English
  • access to a private desktop, laptop, or tablet with broadband internet access

Exclusion:

- Lives outside the United States of America

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
9 sessions and website with entertainment features and resources
The intervention will consist of a website and 9 sessions. The intervention sessions will facilitate youths' acquisition of personal and social cognitive-behavioral skills. The intervention will focus on goal setting, decision making, enhancing self-worth, coping with stress, combating distorted thinking, communication skills, using alcohol and other drugs and a review session. Each session will require approximately 20 minutes and must be finished in a single sitting. Sessions will be delivered on a weekly basis. The website will include entertainment features and resources.
Placebo Comparator: Control
website with entertainment features and resources
Access to the website with entertainment features and resources - but no session content.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
1-year follow-up
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
2-year follow-up
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
3-year follow-up
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
1-year follow-up
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
2-year follow-up
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
3-year follow-up
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
1-year follow-up
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
2-year follow-up
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
3-year follow-up
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
1-year follow-up
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
2-year follow-up
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
3-year follow-up
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
1-year follow-up
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
2-year follow-up
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
3-year follow-up
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
1-year follow-up
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
2-year follow-up
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
3-year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
3-year follow-up
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
3-year follow-up
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
3-year follow-up
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
3-year follow-up
Mean scores for Coping
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Coping
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Coping
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Coping
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
3-year follow-up
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
3-year follow-up
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
3-year follow-up
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
3-year follow-up
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
3-year follow-up
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
an average of 5 months from study onset
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
1-year follow-up
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
2-year follow-up
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
3-year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Traci M. Schwinn, PhD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Abuse

3
Subscribe