- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03954535
Preventing Drug Abuse Among Sexual Minority Youth
Preventing Drug Abuse Among Sexual-Minority Youth
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The randomized controlled trial will include at least 890 sexual-minority youth from the United States. Study participants will be 15- to 17-year-old youth recruited from Facebook/Instagram. All youth will complete pretest measures online. Intervention-arm youth will then interact with the 9-session program; youth in the control arm will have access to an attention-placebo website. All youth will then complete posttest measures (immediately following intervention completion and estimated to be approximately 5 months after study onset) and 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up measures.
Across posttest and annual follow-up measurement occasions, data analyses will examine rates of 30-day drug use between study arms. The investigators will also examine intervention effects on mediator variables associated with drug use and assess the extent to which changes in mediator variables explain differences in drug use between arms.
Youth assigned to the intervention arm will have access to 9 intervention sessions delivered online. The sessions will be housed on a website with entertainment features youth seek: life hacks, features on LGBTQ leaders, fortunes, horoscopes, inspiring quotes, and health-related resources.
To ensure that youths' expectations for study participation are equivalent across arms and to account for the non-active components of the experimental intervention, the investigators designed the attention-placebo arm. Youth assigned to the attention-placebo arm will have access to the website with entertainment features: life hacks, features on LGBTQ leaders, fortunes, horoscopes, inspiring quotes, and health-related resources.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- teenagers between the ages of 15-17 years old
- identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or unsure of sexual orientation
- speak and read English
- access to a private desktop, laptop, or tablet with broadband internet access
Exclusion:
- Lives outside the United States of America
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention
9 sessions and website with entertainment features and resources
|
The intervention will consist of a website and 9 sessions.
The intervention sessions will facilitate youths' acquisition of personal and social cognitive-behavioral skills.
The intervention will focus on goal setting, decision making, enhancing self-worth, coping with stress, combating distorted thinking, communication skills, using alcohol and other drugs and a review session.
Each session will require approximately 20 minutes and must be finished in a single sitting.
Sessions will be delivered on a weekly basis.
The website will include entertainment features and resources.
|
Placebo Comparator: Control
website with entertainment features and resources
|
Access to the website with entertainment features and resources - but no session content.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals.
The mean score will be calculated.
Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals.
The mean score will be calculated.
Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals.
The mean score will be calculated.
Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals.
The mean score will be calculated.
Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems.
The mean score will be calculated.
Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems.
The mean score will be calculated.
Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems.
The mean score will be calculated.
Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems.
The mean score will be calculated.
Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value.
Means scores will be calculated.
Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value.
Means scores will be calculated.
Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value.
Means scores will be calculated.
Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value.
Means scores will be calculated.
Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Coping
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Coping
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Coping
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Coping
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month.
Mean scores will be calculate.
Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month.
Mean scores will be calculate.
Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month.
Mean scores will be calculate.
Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month.
Mean scores will be calculate.
Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana.
Means scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana.
Means scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana.
Means scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana.
Means scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Time Frame: an average of 5 months from study onset
|
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
an average of 5 months from study onset
|
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
|
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
1-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Time Frame: 2-year follow-up
|
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
2-year follow-up
|
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Time Frame: 3-year follow-up
|
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics.
Mean scores will be calculated.
Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
|
3-year follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Traci M. Schwinn, PhD, Columbia University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAR5072
- R01DA043512 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Substance Abuse
-
The Morton Center, Inc.National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)UnknownAlcohol Dependence | Cannabis Dependence | Alcohol Abuse | Cannabis Abuse | Other Substance AbuseUnited States
-
National Health Promotion Associates, Inc.UnknownSubstance Use | Substance Abuse | Prescription Drug Abuse (Not Dependent)United States
-
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical CenterUnknownAlcohol Dependence | Alcohol Abuse | Substance Abuse ProblemUnited States
-
National Health Promotion Associates, Inc.UnknownSubstance Use | Substance Abuse | Prescription Drug Abuse (Not Dependent)
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedDrug/Substance Abuse/Addiction | Alcohol Abuse/AddictionUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSubstance Abuse, IntravenousUnited States
-
Sheidow Consulting, Inc.Oregon Social Learning CenterCompletedSubstance Abuse ProblemUnited States
-
Penn State UniversityCompletedSubstance Abuse ProblemUnited States
-
University of California, IrvineUS Department of Veterans AffairsWithdrawn
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSubstance Abuse DisorderUnited States