Acute Effects of Breakfast Compared With No Breakfast on Cognitive Function and Subjective State in 11-13 Year Old Children

June 6, 2019 updated by: Prof Louise Dye, University of Leeds

Acute Effects of Breakfast Compared With No Breakfast on Cognitive Function and Subjective State in 11-13 Year Old Children: A School-based, Randomised, Controlled, Parallel Groups Trial

This study is a school-based, randomised, controlled, parallel groups trial to examine the acute effect of breakfast (ready-to-eat-cereal and milk) vs. no breakfast on cognitive function and subjective state in 11-13 year old adolescents. It was hypothesised that the consumption of breakfast will have a positive acute effect on cognitive performance and subjective state compared with breakfast omission in 11-13 year olds.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is a school-based, randomised, controlled, parallel groups trial to examine the acute effect of breakfast (ready-to-eat-cereal and milk) vs. no breakfast on cognitive function and subjective state in 11-13 year old adolescents. It was hypothesised that the consumption of breakfast will have a positive acute effect on cognitive performance and subjective state compared with breakfast omission in 11-13 year olds. The study sample consisted of males and females aged 11-13 years who were recruited to take part in the study from a UK secondary school. There were two conditions in this parallel groups study: Breakfast and No breakfast (fasting). The breakfast intervention consisted of ad libitum intake of ready-to-eat-cereal with milk. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and +70 and +215 minutes post-intervention. The Cambridge Neuro-psychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB; Cambridge Cognition Ltd) was used to assess cognitive function. The battery included: Simple Reaction Time (SRT), 5-Choice Reaction Time (5-CRT), Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP), and Paired Associates Learning (PAL), which measured reaction time, visual-sustained attention, and visual-spatial memory respectively. Concomitant ratings of subjective mood, alertness, satiety, and motivation were taken throughout the morning using eight unipolar Visual Analogue Scales

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

234

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Yorkshire
      • Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, LS29JT
        • Human Appetite Research Unit, University of Leeds

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

The inclusion criteria were as follows: aged 11-13 years, willingness to consume RTEC with semi-skimmed cow's milk during the study, ability to follow verbal and written instructions in English, and normal vision with appropriate corrective lenses if required. The exclusion criteria were as follows: inability to understand the objective of the cognitive tests or carry out the tests, behavioural difficulties or attention disorders, administration of any psychotropic medication in the month prior to testing or during testing, food allergies or intolerances which prevent consumption of RTEC and milk (e.g. coeliac, lactose intolerance), acute illness or feeling unwell within the week prior to testing or during testing, and hearing impairment that precluded the normal use of headphones.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No Breakfast
Fasting. Ad libitum water intake permitted.
Experimental: Breakfast
Ad libitum intake of ready-to-eat-cereal with milk. Participants were given a choice of four commercially available RTECs with 1.8% fat cow's milk. Ad libitum water intake was also permitted. The four ready-to-eat-cereals were corn flakes, toasted rice, shredded whole wheat pieces with a sugar topping, and wheat, corn and oat shapes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Paired Associates Learning (PAL) performance
Time Frame: baseline, 70 minutes post-intervention.
Paired Associates Learning (PAL) task was administered on individual touchscreen portable computers.
baseline, 70 minutes post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Simple Reaction Time task performance
Time Frame: baseline, 70 minutes and 215 minutes post-intervention
Reaction time assessed by Simple Reaction Time (SRT) task. The task was administered on individual touchscreen portable computers.
baseline, 70 minutes and 215 minutes post-intervention
5-Choice Reaction Time task performance
Time Frame: baseline, 70 minutes and 215 minutes post-intervention
Reaction time assessed by 5-Choice Reaction Time (5-CRT) task. The task was administered on individual touchscreen portable computers.
baseline, 70 minutes and 215 minutes post-intervention
Rapid Visual Information Processing task (RVIP) performance
Time Frame: baseline, 70 minutes and 215 minutes post-intervention
Visual sustained attention assessed by Rapid Visual Information Processing task (RVIP). The task was administered on individual touchscreen portable computers.
baseline, 70 minutes and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of hunger
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome
baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of cheerfulness
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of energy
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of motivation to try hard
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome
baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of ease of distraction
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome
baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of ease of focusing
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome
baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of feeling of awake
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome
baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of bad temperedness
Time Frame: baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome
baseline, 15 minutes, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of cognitive test battery difficulty
Time Frame: baseline, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their cognitive test battery experience. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome
baseline, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of concentration during the cognitive test battery
Time Frame: baseline, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their cognitive test battery experience. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome
baseline, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of performance on the cognitive test battery
Time Frame: baseline, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their cognitive test battery experience. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome
baseline, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
Subjective unipolar visual analogue scale ratings of frustration during the cognitive test battery
Time Frame: baseline, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention
The unipolar Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal line, 100mm in length, anchored by the extreme intensities of a single subjective feeling (e.g. 'not at all' to 'very'). The participant marks on the line at the point that they feel represents their perception of their cognitive test battery experience. Participants responded to each Visual Analogue Scale using a touch screen computer by moving the cursor along a 100mm line with extreme anchors at each end. The initial location of the cursor was at the 50mm mark. There were 100 points on the scale, yielding possible scores of 0-100. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome
baseline, 70 minutes, and 215 minutes post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RTECCOG1113

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Breakfast: ready-to-eat-cereal and milk

Subscribe