IPACK Versus Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block in ACL Reconstruction

August 20, 2021 updated by: Sujana Dontukurthy

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block With IPACK Versus Adductor Canal and Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

This is a prospective study comparing femoral nerve block plus sciatic nerve block to femoral nerve block plus infiltration of the posterior knee capsule (IPACK) in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Femoral nerve block via the adductor canal (FNB-AC) with IPACK may provide effective analgesia while avoiding the motor block involved with sciatic nerve block. The lack of motor block is important to facilitate postoperative ambulation and physical therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 21 years of age
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II
  • Undergoing elective anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • They are unable or unwilling to take part in the study
  • History of allergy to any of the medications administered for the nerve block
  • Contraindication to peripheral nerve block
  • Patients who are unable to understand instructions or questions related to the study or the families required language interpretation
  • Patients who consume opioid medications for more than three days per week for more than a month prior to surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: FNB-AC + Sciatic nerve block
Patients will receive up to 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for FNB-AC and up to 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block under ultrasound guidance.
Total dose not to exceed 3 mg/kg of ropivacaine.
Experimental: FNB-AC + IPACK
Patients will receive up to 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for FNB-AC and up to 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for posterior knee capsular infiltration under ultrasound guidance (IPACK)
Total dose not to exceed 3 mg/kg of ropivacaine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Post-operative Pain Score
Time Frame: Immediately post-operatively and up to 48 hours post-discharge, an average of 48 hours
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores (0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain) from arrival to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) to 48 hours after discharge from surgery center.
Immediately post-operatively and up to 48 hours post-discharge, an average of 48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Opioid Doses Administered
Time Frame: Intra-operative and up to 48 hours post-discharge, an average of 48 hours
Number of doses of narcotic pain medicine administered during surgery and up to 48 hours after discharge from surgery center.
Intra-operative and up to 48 hours post-discharge, an average of 48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 7, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine injection

3
Subscribe