Sentinel Node Biopsy Vs Observation After Axillary PET (SOAPET)

July 10, 2020 updated by: Zhimin Shao, Fudan University

Sentinel Node Biopsy Vs Observation After Axillary PET Examination

Several researches have proved that avoiding axillary surgery does not worsen the outcome of breast cancer patients with relatively low risk. Based on the routine axillary imaging evaluation (ultrasound and MR etc.) and latest dedicate lymph node PET (LymphPET), axillary nodal burden can be identified before operation.

Therefore this prospective study are designed to evaluate the negative predictive value of LymphPET and to verify whether sentinel lymph node biopsy can be spared in patients with negative preoperative axillary assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1528

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
        • Contact:
          • Zhiming Shao
          • Phone Number: +86-021-64175590

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

stage 1:

  1. female
  2. ≥18 years old
  3. invasive ductal carcinoma or DCIS proved by core needle biopsy
  4. tumor size ≤ 5cm
  5. negative preoperative axillary assessment(including body examination, ultrasound and MR examination)
  6. patients is accessible for the following axillary surgery and pathological test(including sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection)

stage 2:

  1. female
  2. ≥18 years old
  3. invasive carcinoma proved by core needle biopsy
  4. has plan for breast conserving surgery and adjuvant radiation after surgery
  5. negative preoperative axillary assessment(including body examination, ultrasound and axillary PET mSUV<0.27)
  6. patients is accessible for the follow up

Exclusion Criteria:

stage 1:

  1. distant metastases
  2. in the procedure of neoadjuvant therapy
  3. positive preoperative axillary assessment (including body examination, ultrasound and MR examination)
  4. pregnancy or breastfeeding
  5. axillary biopsy or axillary surgery before LymphPET
  6. suffer from diabetes mellitus and without well control of bloodglucose
  7. previous malignancy
  8. allergic to tracer of LymphPET

stage 2:

  1. distant metastases
  2. in the procedure of neoadjuvant therapy
  3. positive preoperative axillary assessment (including body examination, ultrasound and PET mSUV≥0.27)
  4. pregnancy or breastfeeding
  5. axillary biopsy or axillary surgery before LymphPET
  6. suffer from diabetes mellitus and without well control of bloodglucose
  7. previous malignancy
  8. allergic to tracer of LymphPET

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Observation group( SLNB is spared)
In the second stage, sentinel lymph node biopsy will be spared in the patients with negative preoperative axillary assessment.
SLNB is spared in patients with negative preoperative axillary assessment(including LymphPET and other imaging examinations)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
stage 1: negative predictive value
Time Frame: 6 months
negative predictive value of LymphPET in breast cancer patients with a negative preoperative axillary assessment
6 months
stage 2: D-DFS(distant disease-free survival)
Time Frame: 5 years
D-DFS of patients with negative preoperative axillary assessment(including LymphPET and other imaging examination) and for whom axillary surgery is spared
5 years
stage 2: LRFS(local-regional free survival)
Time Frame: 5 years
LRFS of patients with negative preoperative axillary assessment(including LymphPET and other imaging examination) and for whom axillary surgery is spared
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
stage 1: false negative rate
Time Frame: 6 months
false negative rate of LymphPET in breast cancer patients with a negative preoperative axillary assessment
6 months
stage 2: DFS(disease-free survival)
Time Frame: 5 years
DFS of patients with negative preoperative axillary assessment(including LymphPET and other imaging examination) and for whom axillary surgery is spared
5 years
stage 2: OS(overall survival)
Time Frame: 5 years
OS of patients with negative preoperative axillary assessment(including LymphPET and other imaging examination) and for whom axillary surgery is spared
5 years
stage 2: adverse events of upper limbs
Time Frame: 5 years
adverse events of patients with negative preoperative axillary assessment(including LymphPET and other imaging examination) and for whom axillary surgery is spared,as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
5 years
stage 2: breast self evaluation
Time Frame: 5 years
breast self evaluation for patients with negative preoperative axillary and for whom axillary surgery is spared, as assessed by BREAST Q© index. The BREAST-Q has a modular, procedure-specific structure with scales that evaluate both satisfaction and quality of life. Psychometric evaluation reveals high reliability, validity and responsiveness to surgical intervention across all scales. Breast Q is composed of aesthetical and emotional modules, and each score ranges from 1 to 4 points (higher values represent a better self evaluation). By comparing the sum of the score in different modules before and after the surgery, Breast Q can help to facilitate a self evaluation for breast cancer patients.
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhi-Min Shao, Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SCHBCC-SOAPET

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on SLNB is spared

Subscribe