Clinical Assessment of Voriconazole Self Nano Emulsifying Drug Delivery System Intermediate Gel

September 30, 2019 updated by: Sara Botros

Clinical Evaluation of a Formulated Nanoemulsion for Topical Application

Clinical study for the developed voriconazole self nano emulsifying drug delivery system intermediate gel was conducted on 30 patients with tinea versicolor infection.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The clinical work has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association for experiments involving humans. The study was conducted on 30 patients (10 to 60 years old) with tinea versicolor attending the dermatology department outpatient clinic of Minia University Hospital. Local institutional review board approval was obtained for this study (ethical approval number is 24/18). Pregnant or lactating females and Immunocompromized patients. The patients were then divided into 3 groups, placebo group, group A and group B, consisting of 10 patients each. The placebo group received unmedicated formulation, Group A received the medicated formulation once daily and group B were treated twice daily. An informed consent has been obtained from all patients enrolled in the study for photography and treatment. History and general local examination were performed for all patients.The patients were clinically examined under normal light and using wood's lamp and cello-tape test was performed to confirm infection after determining the type of infection and in some cases scrapes were taken to detect infection in clinically indefinite cases and stained using potassium hydroxide 20% then examined for presence of fungal elements. Treatment was performed by applying the gel once or twice daily until full recovery was achieved with follow up once a week to reassess the condition. The clinical improvement of the patients, patient satisfaction and length of treatment were assessed. It was rated by both patient and physician as excellent, good, fair or poor according to the following criteria. Excellent: both the patient and the physician agreed that the result was satisfactory. Good: the result although acceptable was not quite up to expectations, but the physicians were pleased with the outcome. Fair: the improvement was evaluated by both the patient and the physician to be less than expected but still with some improvement. Poor: unsatisfactory results to the patient and /or the physician. All adverse effects were checked during study.High resolution digital photographs were taken for lesions of all patients using identical camera folder setting before starting treatment, on each follow up visit and after complete recovery. Clinical improvement was evaluated by physicians. The criteria for evaluations using a quartile grading scale were: 0=no improvement. 1=mild (percent improvement, less than 25%), 2=moderate (percent improvement 25-49%), 3=good (percent improvement 50-74%), 4=excellent (percent improvement equal to or more than 75%). In addition, a patient satisfaction score was rated using the following scale, A. satisfied, B.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minia
      • Minya, Minia, Egypt, 61519
        • Minia University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Tinea Versicolor infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • concomitant treatment with other medications for the same condition being studied, TVC.
  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • immunocompromised patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: once daily application
the gel is applied to the affected areas once daily for one week followed by a follow-up visit to reassess the case. if complete cure is achieved, stop application. if not, repeat for one more week and then reassess.
voriconazole is incorporated into a nanoemulsion intermediate gel state then applied on the affected areas once daily
Experimental: twice daily application
the gel is applied to the affected areas twice daily for one week followed by a follow-up visit to reassess the case. if complete cure is achieved, stop application. if not, repeat for one more week and then reassess.
voriconazole is incorporated into a nanoemulsion intermediate gel state then applied on the affected areas twice daily
Placebo Comparator: placebo
the gel is applied to the affected areas twice daily for one week followed by a follow-up visit to reassess the case. if complete cure is achieved, stop application. if not, repeat for one more week and then reassess.
the same procedure as before is used to prepare the nanoemulsion intermediate gel but the active ingredient, voriconazole, is not added then applied twice daily in the same manner

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
complete cure
Time Frame: 1-4 weeks
1-4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tinea Versicolor

Clinical Trials on voriconazole gel once daily

3
Subscribe