Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lenacapavir (GS-6207) in Combination With Other Antiretroviral Agents in People Living With HIV (CALIBRATE)

September 9, 2024 updated by: Gilead Sciences

A Phase 2 Randomized, Open Label, Active Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Long-acting Capsid Inhibitor GS-6207 in Combination With Other Antiretroviral Agents in People Living With HIV

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of lenacapavir (formerly GS-6207) containing regimens in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

183

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 10103
        • Instituto Dominicano de Estudios Virologicos (IDEV)
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00909
        • HOPE Clinical Research
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00909-1711
        • Clinical Research Puerto Rico
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00935
        • Proyecto ACTU, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85004
        • Valleywise Community Health Center - McDowell
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85015
        • Pueblo Family Physicians
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90036
        • Ruane Clinical Research Group Inc
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90069
        • Mills Clinical Research at Men's Health Foundation
      • Palm Springs, California, United States, 92264
        • Eisenhower Health Center at Rimrock
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado, Denver, University of Colorado Hospital
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Public Health
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale University; School of Medicine
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Georgetown University Hospital
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20017
        • Washington Health Institute
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20009
        • Whitman-Walker Institute, Inc.
    • Florida
      • DeLand, Florida, United States, 32720
        • Midland Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC
      • Fort Pierce, Florida, United States, 34982
        • Midway Immunology and Research Center
      • Hialeah, Florida, United States, 33016
        • Floridian Clinical Research
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33133
        • AHF-The Kinder Medical Group
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33140
        • AIDS Healthcare Foundation - South Beach
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803-1851
        • Orlando Immunology Center
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
        • St. Joseph's Hospital Comprehensive Research Institute
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401
        • Triple O Research Institute, P.A.
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
        • Atlanta ID Group, PC
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • August University Medical Center
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
        • Infectious Disease Specialists of Atlanta
      • Macon, Georgia, United States, 31201
        • Mercer University, Department of Internal Medicine
      • Savannah, Georgia, United States, 31401
        • Chatham County Health Department
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60613
        • Howard Brown Health Center
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60657
        • Northstar Healthcare
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46077
        • Indiana University Infectious Diseases Research
    • Michigan
      • Berkley, Michigan, United States, 48072
        • Be Well Medical Center
      • Southfield, Michigan, United States, 48075
        • St. John Newland Medical Associates
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • KC Care Health Center
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10001
        • AHF-Midtown
    • North Carolina
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27858
        • East Carolina University, The Brody School of Medicine
      • Huntersville, North Carolina, United States, 28078
        • Rosedale Infectious Diseases
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Case Clinical Research Site/University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Allegheny Health Network
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105
        • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Central Texas Clinical Research
      • Bellaire, Texas, United States, 77401
        • St Hope Foundation
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • North Texas Infectious Diseases Consultants, P.A.
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75208
        • Prism Health North Texas
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
        • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77098
        • The Crofoot Research Center, INC.
      • Longview, Texas, United States, 75605
        • DCOL Center for Clinical Research
    • Virginia
      • Annandale, Virginia, United States, 22003
        • Clinical Alliance for Research & Education - Infectious Diseases, LLC (CARE-ID)
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • Peter Shalit, M.D.
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
        • MultiCare Rockwood HIV Critical Care Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Antiretroviral (ARV) naive with no use of any ARV within one month of screening. Use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) (any duration), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) (any duration), or HIV-1 treatment (< 10 days therapy total) > 1 month prior to screening is permitted
  • HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) ≥ 200 copies/mL at screening
  • Cluster Determinant 4+ (CD4+) cell count ≥ 200 cells/microliter at screening

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) or Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lenacapavir, F/TAF, and TAF

Induction phase: Participants will receive lenacapavir (LEN) 600 mg (2 X 300 mg, tablet) orally on Days 1 and 2, followed by LEN 300 mg tablet orally on Day 8 plus emtricitabine/ tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) (200/25 mg) fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets once daily orally from Day 1 to Week 28 plus LEN 927 mg (309 mg/mL; 2 X 1.5 mL) via subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 15.

Maintenance phase: Participants will receive LEN 927 mg (309 mg/mL; 2 X 1.5 mL) via SC injection on Week 28 and every 6 months (26 weeks) thereafter plus TAF 25 mg tablets once daily orally at Week 28 and will continue up to Week 80.

Participants willing to continue the study beyond Week 80 will continue to receive SC LEN 927 mg injection every 6 months (26 weeks) and oral daily TAF 25 mg tablets from Week 80 onwards.

Tablets administered without regard to food
Other Names:
  • GS-6207
Administered in the abdomen via subcutaneous injections
Other Names:
  • GS-6207
Tablets administered without regard to food
Other Names:
  • Descovy®
Tablets administered without regard to food
Experimental: Lenacapavir, F/TAF, and BIC

Induction phase: Participants will receive LEN 600 mg (2 X 300 mg, tablet) orally on Days 1 and 2, followed by LEN 300 mg tablet orally on Day 8 plus F/TAF (200/25 mg) FDC tablets once daily orally from Day 1 to Week 28 plus LEN 927 mg (309 mg/mL; 2 X 1.5 mL) via SC injection on Day 15.

Maintenance phase: Participants will receive LEN 927 mg (309 mg/mL; 2 X 1.5 mL) via SC injection on Week 28 and every 6 months (26 weeks) thereafter plus bictegravir (BIC) 75 mg tablets once daily orally at Week 28 and will continue up to Week 80.

Participants willing to continue the study beyond Week 80 will continue to receive SC LEN 927 mg injection every 6 months (26 weeks) and oral daily BIC 75 mg tablets from Week 80 onwards.

Tablets administered without regard to food
Other Names:
  • GS-6207
Administered in the abdomen via subcutaneous injections
Other Names:
  • GS-6207
Tablets administered without regard to food
Other Names:
  • Descovy®
Tablets administered without regard to food
Experimental: Lenacapavir and F/TAF

Induction phase: Participants will receive LEN 600 mg (2 X 300 mg, tablet) orally on Days 1 and 2, followed by LEN 300 mg tablet orally on Day 8 plus F/TAF (200/25 mg) FDC tablets once daily orally from Day 1 to Week 28 plus LEN 927 mg (309 mg/mL; 2 X 1.5 mL) via SC injection on Day 15.

Maintenance phase: Participants will receive LEN 927 mg (309 mg/mL; 2 X 1.5 mL) via SC injection on Week 28 and every 6 months (26 weeks) thereafter plus bictegravir (BIC) 75 mg tablets once daily orally at Week 28 and will continue up to Week 80.

Participants willing to continue the study beyond Week 80 will continue to receive SC LEN 927 mg injection every 6 months (26 weeks) and oral daily BIC 75 mg tablets from Week 80 onwards.

Tablets administered without regard to food
Other Names:
  • GS-6207
Tablets administered without regard to food
Other Names:
  • Descovy®
Active Comparator: B/F/TAF
Participants will receive bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) (50/200/25 mg) FDC tablets once daily orally from Day 1 and throughout their participation in the study up to Week 80
Tablets administered without regard to food
Other Names:
  • Biktarvy®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-1 RNA) < 50 Copies/mL at Week 54 as Determined by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)-Defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 54
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 54 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. Week 54 window was between Day 323 and 413 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.
Week 54

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PK of TAF and TFV (Tenofovir): Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug (Cmax) on Day 1
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose on Day 1
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). Key PK parameters of TAF and TFV were summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. PK substudy analysis was conducted for Group 1 and 2 on Day 1.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose on Day 1
PK of TAF and TFV: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax (Tmax) on Day 1
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose on Day 1
Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). Key PK parameters of TAF and TFV were summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. PK substudy analysis was conducted for Group 1 and 2 on Day 1.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose on Day 1
PK of TFV: Last Observed Quantifiable Concentration of the Drug (Clast) on Day 1
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose on Day 1
Clast is defined as the last observable concentration of drug. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). Key PK parameters of TFV were summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. PK sub study analysis was conducted for Group 1 and 2 on Day 1.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose on Day 1
PK of TAF and TFV: AUClast at Weeks 16, 22, or 28
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
AUClast is defined as area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 15 participants in the treatment group receiving oral LEN (Treatment Group 3). Key PK parameters of TAF and TFV were summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. For each participant, PK samples were taken at only one of the three possible visits: Weeks 16, 22, or 28. The PK results were combined and summarized without regard to specific study visit within the range of prespecified study visits.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of TAF and TFV: Cmax at Weeks 16, 22, or 28
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 15 participants in the treatment group receiving oral LEN (Treatment Group 3). Key PK parameters of TAF and TFV were summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. For each participant, PK samples were taken at only one of the three possible visits: Weeks 16, 22, or 28. The PK results were combined and summarized without regard to specific study visit within the range of prespecified study visits.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of TAF and TFV: Tmax at Weeks 16, 22, or 28
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 15 participants in the treatment group receiving oral LEN (Treatment Group 3). Key PK parameters of TAF and TFV were summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. For each participant, PK samples were taken at only one of the three possible visits: Weeks 16, 22, or 28. The PK results were combined and summarized without regard to specific study visit within the range of prespecified study visits.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of TFV: Clast at Weeks 16, 22, or 28
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Clast is defined as the last observable concentration of drug. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 15 participants in the treatment group receiving oral LEN (Treatment Group 3). Key PK parameters of TFV was summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. For each participant, PK samples were taken at only one of the three possible visits: Weeks 16, 22, or 28. The PK results were combined and summarized without regard to specific study visit within the range of prespecified study visits.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of TAF: AUClast at Week 38
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
AUClast is defined as area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). Key PK parameters of TAF was summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. PK substudy analysis was conducted for Group 1 at Week 38.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of TAF: Cmax at Week 38
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). Key PK parameters of TAF was summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. PK substudy analysis was conducted for Group 1 at Week 38.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of TAF: Tmax at Week 38
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). Key PK parameters of TAF was summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. PK substudy analysis was conducted for Group 1 at Week 38.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of Tenofovir Diphosphate (TFV-DP): AUClast at Weeks 4, 10, 16, or 22
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 1, 2, and 6 hours postdose
AUClast is defined as area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration. A peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) substudy was conducted in a total of approximately 15 participants in Treatment Groups 1 and 2. For each participant, PK samples were taken at only one of the four possible visits: Weeks 4, 10, 16, or 22. A 12-hour postdose sample was collected, if possible. The PK results were combined and summarized without regard to specific study visit within the range of prespecified study visits.
0 hours (Predose) and at 1, 2, and 6 hours postdose
PK of TFV-DP: Cmax at Weeks 4, 10, 16, or 22
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 1, 2, and 6 hours postdose
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug. A PBMC substudy was conducted in a total of approximately 15 participants in Treatment Groups 1 and 2. For each participant, PK samples were taken at only one of the four possible visits: Weeks 4, 10, 16, or 22. A 12-hour postdose sample was collected, if possible. The PK results were combined and summarized without regard to specific study visit within the range of prespecified study visits.
0 hours (Predose) and at 1, 2, and 6 hours postdose
PK of TFV-DP: Tmax at Weeks 4, 10, 16, or 22
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 1, 2, and 6 hours postdose
Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax. A PBMC substudy was conducted in a total of approximately 15 participants in Treatment Groups 1 and 2. For each participant, PK samples were taken at only one of the four possible visits: Weeks 4, 10, 16, or 22. A 12-hour postdose sample was collected, if possible. The PK results were combined and summarized without regard to specific study visit within the range of prespecified study visits.
0 hours (Predose) and at 1, 2, and 6 hours postdose
PK of Bictegravir (BIC): AUClast at Week 38
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
AUClast is defined as area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). At Week 38, samples were analyzed for BIC only in Treatment Group 2.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of BIC: Cmax at Week 38
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). At Week 38, samples were analyzed for BIC only in Treatment Group 2.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of BIC: Tmax at Week 38
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). At Week 38, samples were analyzed for BIC only in Treatment Group 2.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
PK of BIC: Clast at Week 38
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Clast is defined as the last observable concentration of drug. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2). At Week 38, samples were analyzed for BIC only in Treatment Group 2.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 28 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 28
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 28 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. Week 28 window was between Days 176 and 231 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.
Week 28
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 38 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 38
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 38 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. Week 38 window was between Days 232 and 322 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.
Week 38
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 80 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm
Time Frame: Week 80
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 80 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. The Week 80 window was between Days 505 and 595 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.
Week 80
Change From Baseline in Log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 38
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 38
Baseline, Week 38
Change From Baseline in Log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 54
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 54
Baseline, Week 54
Change From Baseline in Log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 80
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 80
Baseline, Week 80
Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 38
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 38
Baseline, Week 38
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 54
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 54
Baseline, Week 54
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 80
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 80
Baseline, Week 80
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Up to 174.9 weeks
TEAEs were defined as 1 or both of any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug, or any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than the last exposure date after permanent discontinuation of the study drug. Percentages were rounded off.
Up to 174.9 weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Maximum Postbaseline Laboratory Abnormalities
Time Frame: Up to 174.9 weeks
Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increase at least 1 toxicity grade from baseline at any postbaseline visit, up to last exposure date for participants who permanently discontinued study drug. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening. Percentages were rounded off.
Up to 174.9 weeks
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of LEN: Plasma LEN Pre-dose Concentrations for SC LEN
Time Frame: Day 2, 8, Day 1 SC (Day 15), Week 28 and Week 54
Day 2, 8, Day 1 SC (Day 15), Week 28 and Week 54
PK of LEN : Plasma LEN Single Anytime Concentrations for the Oral LEN + DVY
Time Frame: Day 2, 8, 15 , Week 28 and Week 54
Day 2, 8, 15 , Week 28 and Week 54
PK of TAF (Tenofovir Alafenamide) and TFV (Tenofovir): Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUClast) on Day 1
Time Frame: 0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose on Day 1
AUClast is defined as area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration. A PK substudy was conducted in at least 10 participants in each of the treatment groups receiving SC LEN (Treatment Groups 1 and 2) and at least 15 participants in the treatment group receiving oral LEN (Treatment Group 3). Key PK parameters of TAF and TFV were summarized for participants in the PK Sub study Analysis Set by treatment group, analyte and visit. PK substudy analysis was conducted for Group 1 and 2 on Day 1.
0 hours (Predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours postdose on Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gilead Study Director, Gilead Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 19, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified external researchers may request IPD for this study after study completion. For more information, please visit our website at https://www.gileadclinicaltrials.com/transparency-policy#Commitment

IPD Sharing Time Frame

18 months after study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A secured external environment with username, password, and RSA code.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection

Clinical Trials on Oral Lenacapavir

Subscribe