Myocardial Perfusion and Contractile Reserve in End-stage Renal Disease

November 21, 2019 updated by: University Hospital Muenster

Myocardial Perfusion and Contractile Reserve in End-stage Renal Disease: A Prospective Study Combining Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

The investigators prospectively recruited a total of 377 ESRD patients evaluated for kidney transplantation between January 2010 and July 2013 in our centre. Criteria for participation were a GFR below 20 ml/min/1.73m² or the need for haemodialysis and an age ≥18 years. 323 patients were on regular dialysis, the remaining 54 patients were being prepared for impending dialysis. Patients with known ischemic heart disease were excluded from the study. All patients underwent a systematic analysis of cardiovascular risk factors based on structured interviews with a physician, health records, blood lipid levels, and routine MPS at rest and under stress. In addition, 230 ESRD patients (61%) received standardized DSE. Patients with signs of ischemia in MPS and/or DSE were evaluated for coronary angiography on clinical grounds.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a critical condition and bears a high risk of cardiovascular events. However, clinical algorithms to identify patients with coronary vasculopathies are still not defined and standardized. Non-invasive imaging by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) or dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) might be used in such patients, however, it is unclear if these provide complementary or identical information and how this correlates to coronary angiography. A direct comparison of these imaging approaches, excellently validated in coronary artery disease, has not yet been described in well-defined and large groups of ESRD patients.

The investigators therefore initiated a large prospective trial with 377 highly-selected and well-characterized end-stage renal disease patients without known coronary artery disease comparing the performance of standardized MPS and DSE. For the first time we here describe a significantly large proportion of ESRD patients with contradictory findings in MPS and DSE and its correlation to invasive coronary angiography hinting to complementary rather than identical information between both modalities. This is an excellent basis of future studies comparing the prognostic value of MPS versus DSE versus a combined MPS/DSE approach.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

377

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

377 ESRD patients evaluated for kidney transplantation between January 2010 and July 2013 in our centre. Criteria for participation were a GFR below 20 ml/min/1.73m² or the need for haemodialysis and an age ≥18 years. 323 patients were on regular dialysis, the remaining 54 patients were being prepared for impending dialysis. Patients with known ischemic heart disease were excluded from the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • GFR below 20 ml/min/1.73m²

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children
  • pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
377patients evaluated by MPS and DSE
Other Names:
  • Dobutamine stress echocardiography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ischemia
Time Frame: january 2010 - june 2013
Number of patients with reversible perfusion defects in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy or wall motion abnormalities in stress echocardiography
january 2010 - june 2013

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Schäfers, Prof., Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

3
Subscribe