Facilitating the Implementation of Interim Methadone to Increase Treatment Access

July 27, 2022 updated by: Friends Research Institute, Inc.

Facilitating the Implementation of Interim Methadone to Increase Treatment Access: A Multi-Site Implementation Trial

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Implementation Facilitation (IF) in promoting increased accessibility to methadone treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a Type 3 implementation-effectiveness type study using a modified stepped wedge design. The study's purpose is to examine the effectiveness of Implementation Facilitation (IF) to prompt participating Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) to utilize interim methadone treatment and other approaches to reduce OTP admission delays. Interim methadone treamtent is an evidence-based practice permitted under federal OTP regulations to provide methadone treatment without routine counseling for individuals requesting methadone treatment who otherwise would not be able to be admitted to such treatment within 14 days of request. The study will be conducted at six OTPs in the US that are unable to admit individuals within 14 days of their request for methadone treatment. The OTPs will participate in a baseline Pre-Implementation Phase, an Implementation Phase, followed by a Sustainability Phase. OTPs will be randomly assigned in groups of two to the order in which they will initiate the Implementation Phase. IF will be delivered at the level of the OTP staff and their state health department official responsible for OTP oversight. OTP staff and state health department officials will be interviewed regarding facilitators and barriers to implementing interim methadone and other approaches to reduce admission delays. De-identified data will be gathered from the OTPs on the effectiveness of IF in prompting the implementation of interim methadone and reducing admission delays.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Robert Philip Schwartz, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria (Staff):

  • OTP staff
  • State health department staff responsible for OTP oversight

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling to be interviewed

Inclusion Criteria (OTP applicants):

  • requesting admission to OTP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Usual Practice
OTPs are able to request from state and federal health department officials to utilize interim methadone treatment to address admission delays in their OTP.
OTP Directors are able to ask their state health officials permission to use interim methadone treatment. The state officials are in turn able to ask officials from the Center of Substance Abuse Treatment for permission to provide interim methadone treatment.
Experimental: Implementation Facilitation
Implementation Facilitation (IF) will consist of educational outreach to OTP staff, identification of local champions, training, performance feedback, and learning collaborative for OTP staff and state health department officials.
Implementation Facilitation (IF) will consist of educational outreach to OTP staff, identification of local champions, training, performance feedback, and learning collaborative for OTP staff and state health department officials.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accessibility
Time Frame: Nine months
Accessibility will be assessed from de-identified OTP records as the proportion of individuals requesting methadone treatment who receive at least one dose of methadone through either interim methadone (IM) or standard methadone within 14 days, divided by the number of individuals requesting methadone treatment.
Nine months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uptake
Time Frame: Nine months
Uptake will be assessed from de-identified OTP records as the proportion of individuals unable to gain admission within 14 days who receive at least one interim methadone dose divided by the number of individuals who were unable to be admitted within 14 days.
Nine months
Efficiency
Time Frame: Nine months
Efficiency will be assessed from de-identified OTP records as the number of days from the request for OTP admission prior to receiving a first methadone dose.
Nine months
Fidelity
Time Frame: Six months
Fidelity will be assessed from de-identified OTP records as the proportion of interim methadone patients transferred to standard methadone treatment within the permitted time limit from starting interim methadone treatment.
Six months
Uptake during the Sustainability Phase
Time Frame: Six months
Sustainability will be assessed from de-identified OTP records as the proportion of interim methadone patients admitted within 14 days of request during the Sustainability Phase
Six months
Effectiveness: percentage of opioid positive tests
Time Frame: Six months
Effectiveness will be assessed from de-identified OTP records as the percentage of opioid-positive urine tests of interim methadone patients at the time of transfer to standard methadone treatment
Six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert P Schwartz, M.D., Friends Research Institute, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid-use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Usual Practice

3
Subscribe