Facing Obstacles to RDI (Relative Dose Intensity) Through Telephone Intervention Strategy (FORTIS)

March 31, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Facing Obstacles to RDI(Relative Dose Intensity)Through Telephone Intervention Strategy

The investigators plan to conduct a nurse-based telephone intervention study to minimize toxicity and increase compliance to a combination of Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (FCR) given frontline to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bayonne, France, 64109
        • Centre Hospitalier de La Côte Basque
      • Perpignan, France, 66046
        • CH Saint Jean
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • CHU Purpan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. CLL whatever Binet stage, but with at least one NCIWG2008 criteria indicating a need for first line treatment.

    • Matutes score must be 4-5/5.
    • Initial cytopenia (due to CLL) are not exclusion criteria.
    • Lymph node biopsy is needed only if suspicion of Richter syndrome.
    • Mandatory pre-therapeutic check-up: FISH in search for deletion del17p and del11q, DAT test, haptoglobin levels, creatinine clearance.
  2. Eligibility to a treatment with FCR: clearance > 60ml/mn, consider dose adjustments (recommended by protocol) if clearance30-60ml/mn, and comorbidity score CIRS-G≤11.
  3. Signed informed consent
  4. Age> or equal 18 years, ECOG PS 0-2.
  5. Estimated overall survival>6 months.
  6. Conserved liver function (bilirubin<2,5mg/dl, SGPT<4ULN, SGOT<4ULN) except infiltration due to the disease.
  7. Contraception for younger patients.
  8. Confident with the use of telephone, no disabling deafness.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Richter syndrome or atypical CLL (Matutes score <4), and/or del17p by FISH
  2. Relapse of CLL
  3. Contra-indications to fludarabine: auto-immune cytopenia, creatinine clearance<30 ml/mn.
  4. Serologies positive for HIV, HBV, or HCV. No active bacterial, viral or fungal infection
  5. Previous history of hypersensibility to any product used in this protocol
  6. Denial, or medical or psychological condition preventing completion of the signed informed consent.
  7. Treatment with an investigational agent, or participation to another therapeutic protocol, 30 days before participating to this study.
  8. Pregnant/breastfeeding women.
  9. CNS involvement by CLL.
  10. Presence of another cancer needing treatment (except basocellular carcinoma or cervix cancer managed with only surgery or local therapy).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Without AMA
Patient will be follow only like usual practice
None, only usual practice.
Other: With AMA
Patient will be follow like usual practice, plus 'Telephone Intervention' every week with a nurse to evaluate physical conditions.
Only for arm AMA, patient will have one phone every week to evaluate physical conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of RDI
Time Frame: 3 years
Reductions in Relative Dose Intensity, calculated as the difference between initially planned doses of F, C and R and effectively prescribed doses of the 3 drugs, before and after 6 courses of FCR.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Toxicity grade III-IV
Time Frame: 3 years
rate of grade III-IV toxicities (neutropenia, fever, infections, renal insufficiency), assessment of quality of life and psychological comfort during FCR therapy.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Loïc YSEBAERT, MD, University Hospital of Toulouse

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

July 13, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Usual Practice

Subscribe