Nivolumab and Temozolomide Versus Temozolomide Alone in Newly Diagnosed Elderly Patients With GBM (NUTMEG)

June 13, 2023 updated by: University of Sydney

A Randomised Phase II Study of NivolUmab and TeMozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone in Newly Diagnosed Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma (NUTMEG)

This study aims to investigate effect of Nivolumab and Temozolomide vs Temozolomide alone on overall survival in newly diagnosed elderly patients with glioblastoma.

Who is it for? You may be eligible to join this study if you are aged 65 years or above, with newly diagnosed histologically confirmed GBM (WHO grade IV glioma including gliosarcoma) following surgery.

The study aims to evaluate whether the combination of adjuvant nivolumab with temozolomide improves overall survival outcomes for this patient population. The outcome of the study will help determine the most effective treatment for patients with glioblastoma in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Study details:

Participants will be allocated to either experimental or control group in a 2:1 ratio by chance (randomly). Patients assigned to the experimental group will receive a course of nivolumab via intravenous infusion (240 mg on days 1 and 15 every 28 days for cycles 1-4; then 480 mg day 1 every 28 days for cycles 5-6) in addition to the standard regimen of Temozolomide (TMZ) tablets and radiotherapy. Patients assigned to the control group will receive the standard treatment of adjuvant temozolomide (150-200mg/m2 days 1-5 every 28 days) for 6 cycles and standard radiotherapy treatment (40 Gy administered in 15 fractions).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia, 2560
        • Campbelltown Hospital
      • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
        • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
      • Gosford, New South Wales, Australia, 2250
        • Gosford Hospital
      • New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia, 2305
        • Newcastle Private Hospital
      • Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia, 2444
        • Port Macquarie Hospital
      • Randwick, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
        • Prince Of Wales Hospital
      • Saint Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
        • Royal North Shore Hospital
      • Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia, 2500
        • Wollongong Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4029
        • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
      • South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4101
        • Icon Cancer Centre
      • Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, 4102
        • Princess Alexandra Hospital
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital
      • Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia, 5042
        • Flinders Medical Centre
    • Tasmania
      • Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 7000
        • Royal Hobart Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Monash Medical Centre
      • Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084
        • Austin Hospital
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
        • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
      • Richmond, Victoria, Australia, 3121
        • Epworth Healthcare
    • Western Australia
      • Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults, aged greater than or equal to 70 years, or aged 65-69 years if long course RT is inappropriate, with newly diagnosed histologically confirmed GBM (WHO grade IV glioma including gliosarcoma) following surgery
  2. Tissue available for MGMT testing
  3. ECOG 0-2
  4. Life expectancy of >12 weeks
  5. Adequate bone marrow function (platelets > 100 x 10^9/L, ANC > 1.5 x 10^9/L)
  6. Adequate liver function (ALT/AST < 1.5 x ULN)
  7. Adequate renal function (creatinine clearance > 30 ml/min measured using Cockcroft-Gault
  8. Willing and able to comply with all study requirements, including treatment, timing and/or nature of required assessments including MRI
  9. Signed, written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Specific comorbidities or conditions (e.g. psychiatric) or concomitant medications which may impact with the administration of study related treatments or procedures
  2. Other co-morbidities or conditions that may compromise assessment of key outcomes
  3. Prior chemotherapy or cranial radiation within the last 5 years. Prior or concomitant therapies for GBM (except surgery).
  4. History of another malignancy within 2 years prior to registration. Patients with a past history of adequately treated carcinoma-in-situ, basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder are eligible. Patients with a history of other malignancies are eligible if they have been continuously disease free for at least 2 years after definitive primary treatment.
  5. Significant infection, including chronic active hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV. Testing for these is not mandatory unless clinically indicated
  6. Active, known or suspected autoimmune disease. Subjects with type I diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism only requiring hormone replacement, skin disorders (such as vitiligo, psoriasis or alopecia) not requiring systemic treatment, or conditions not expected to recur in the absence of an external trigger are permitted to enroll.
  7. For symptoms related to GBM, the need for >4 mg/day of dexamethasone or >20 mg/day prednisone (or equivalent) at the time of screening.
  8. For a condition other than GBM, the need for >2 mg/day of dexamethasone or >10 mg/day prednisone (or equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days prior to randomisation. Exceptions to this include the use of inhaled or topical steroids >10 mg/day prednisone (or equivalent), which are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nivolumab and Temozolomide
After radiotherapy and 4 week break, participants who are assigned to this arm will receive Nivolumab with concurrent adjuvant temozolomide treatment
Participants will receive Nivolumab intravenous infusions (240 mg days 1 and 15 every 28 days for cycles 1-4; then 480 mg day 1 every 28 days for cycles 5-6).
Other Names:
  • Opdivo
Participants will receive temozolomide (TMZ) tablets days 1-5, every 28 days for 6 cycles. TMZ will be dosed at 150mg/m2 for the first cycle. If well tolerated TMZ is then given at 200mg/m2 for cycles 2 - 6.
Other Names:
  • Temodar
  • Temodal
  • Temcad
Active Comparator: Temozolomide
After radiotherapy and 4 week break, participants who are assigned to this arm will receive the standard treatment of adjuvant temozolomide treatment
Participants will receive temozolomide (TMZ) tablets days 1-5, every 28 days for 6 cycles. TMZ will be dosed at 150mg/m2 for the first cycle. If well tolerated TMZ is then given at 200mg/m2 for cycles 2 - 6.
Other Names:
  • Temodar
  • Temodal
  • Temcad

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival outcomes
Time Frame: 24 months post randomisation of first participant
Overall survival is defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to date of death from any cause, or date of last known follow-up alive. This will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
24 months post randomisation of first participant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: 6 months post randomisation
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the interval from date of randomisation to the date of first evidence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. The PFS will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and disease progression is defined according to modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria.
6 months post randomisation
Number and severity of adverse events
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 24 months
The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (NCI CTCAE v4.03) will be used to classify and grade the intensity of adverse events.
Through study completion, up to 24 months
Health related quality of life of participants (QLQ C-30)
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 24 months
Health related quality of life will be reported directly by the participants using the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire QLQ C-30. The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire with 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of physical functioning.
Through study completion, up to 24 months
Health related quality of life of participants (QLQ-BN20)
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 24 months
Health related quality of life will be reported directly by the participants using the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire brain cancer specific module (QLQ-BN20). The QLQ-BN20 consisted of 20 items assessing visual disorders, motor dysfunction, communication deficit, various disease symptoms (e.g. headaches and seizures), treatment toxicities (e.g. hair loss) and future uncertainty. All of the 20 items are rated on a 4 point scale (1=not at all, 4=very much), and were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Through study completion, up to 24 months
Health related quality of life of participants (EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 24 months
Health related quality of life will be reported directly by the participants using the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire EuroQol EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and as overall health using a "thermometer" visual analog scale with response options ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Through study completion, up to 24 months
Neurologic function of participants
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 24 months
Cognitive function will be assessed by the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scales. The NANO is a quantifiable evaluation of nine major domains for subjects with brain tumours. The domains include: gait, strength, ataxia, sensation, visual field, facial strength, language, level of consciousness, behaviour and overall. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and 3 represents the worst severity. The evaluation is based on direct observation/testing performed during routine office visits.
Through study completion, up to 24 months
Correlating modified RANO and immune related RANO in the experimental arm
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 24 months
Site investigators will assess disease progression using modified RANO criteria for clinical decision making. The study team will coordinate image analysis and central review of MRI including modified RANO (both experimental and comparator arms) and iRANO (in the experimental arm).
Through study completion, up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mustafa Khasraw, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioblastoma Multiforme

Clinical Trials on Nivolumab

3
Subscribe