The Effect of Trendelenburg Position on CCA Blood Flow

January 17, 2022 updated by: Jin-Tae Kim, Seoul National University Hospital

Influence of Anesthesia, Pneumoperitoneum, and Patient Position on Common Carotid Artery Blood Flow During Laparoscopic Gynecology Operation

The investigators will evaluate the change of the common carotid artery blood flow according to patient's position and penumoperitoneum.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study will include 20 patients undergoing gynecological surgery. The common carotid artery blood flow will be measured using Doppler US during the following conditions; supine position before induction of anesthesia, supine position immediately after induction of anesthesia, supine position with penumoperitoneum, head-down position with or without pneumoperitoneum.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients undergoing gynecology surgery under trendelenburg position

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA class I,II
  • patients undergoing gynecology surgery under trendelenburg position
  • Age ranges from 20 to 70

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 32
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients who did not agree to study
  • Patients with allergies to the drugs used in this study
  • Patients with anatomical variations or lesions in cervical or cranial vascular portion
  • Patients with arrhythmia that may alter patient's cardiac output(e.g. artrial fibrillation)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the common carotid artery blood flow velocity
Time Frame: 1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Common carotid artery blood flow velocity is measured using Doppler US
1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the common carotid artery beat volume
Time Frame: 1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Common carotid artery beat volume was calculated from median common carotid artery beat velocity and vessel diameter
1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Change of the common carotid artery diameter
Time Frame: 1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Common carotid artery diameter is obtained using US
1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Change of mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: 1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Mean arterial pressure is obtained concurrently with common carotid artery blood flow velocity measurements
1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Change of cardiac output
Time Frame: 1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Cardiac output was obtained using FloTrac(EdwardLifescience, USA)
1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Change of peak inspiration airway pressure
Time Frame: 1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position
Peak inspiratory airway pressure is obtained using the ventilator system
1) baseline, 2) Immediately after induction of anesthesia, 3) immediately after pneumoperitoneum, 4) immediately after Trendelenburg position with penumoperitoneum, 5) Immediately after desufflation in Trendelenburg position

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CCA-BF

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perioperative/Postoperative Complications

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Portugal

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe