- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04283188
12-Month Extension Study of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Youth With Bipolar Disorder (DB2)
April 11, 2023 updated by: Dr. Benjamin Goldstein, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Pragmatic Patient-Oriented 12-Month Extension Study of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Youth With Bipolar Disorder
The overarching goal of this project is to evaluate the longer-term effects of implementing DBT for adolescents with BD in a subspecialty clinic.
In collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh and continuing from the parent study (042-2018), this study will measure the longer-term effects of DBT in additional the the longer-term effects of DBT training on study therapist knowledge and performance.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is an extension study related to an ongoing implementation study of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for adolescents with bipolar disorder, in collaboration with investigators at the University of Pittsburgh.
During the conduct of that initial study (the DITO study; REB PIN 042-2018), compelling questions have been raised by the investigators, study therapists, and participants/patients about what will happen following participation in the initial study: Which DBT outcomes are sustained over time?
Will patients request and/or require additional booster sessions?
Will study therapists remain adherent to the treatment model?
There is sparse knowledge regarding what happens after a course of DBT is completed, and this study seeks to advance our understanding of what happens in the year after DBT by addressing these questions.
This study provides a unique opportunity to examine the frequency, dose, and indications for ongoing DBT treatment for participants who have completed one year of DBT at the Centre for Youth Bipolar Disorder (CYBD).
In the spirit of the original dissemination and implementation study, this study is focused on "real-world" issues routinely faced by study therapists and patients, and anticipated findings will inform future randomized controlled trials on this topic.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
15
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N3M5
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J 1H4
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
10 years to 17 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- English-speaking
- Age 14 years, 0 months to 21 years, 11 months
- Meet diagnostic criteria for BD by KSADS-PL
- Followed by a CAMH or Sunnybrook psychiatrist who provides ongoing care
- If BD-I, taking ≥1 mood stabilizing medication (i.e., antimanic anticonvulsant, antipsychotic, and/or lithium
- Has completed participation in the DITO study (REB PIN 042-2018)
- Able and willing to give informed consent/assent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of mental retardation, moderate to severe pervasive developmental disorder, or organic central nervous system disorder by the K-SADS-PL, parent report, medical history, or school records
- A life-threatening medical condition requiring immediate treatment
- Current victim of sexual or physical abuse.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Adolescents with bipolar disorder
25 adolescents aged 14 to 21 with bipolar disorder (type I, type II, not otherwise specified/nos) will be enrolled in the dialectical behavioral therapy intervention.
|
Participants will be provided with the option to continue treatment with their study therapist.
For those who elect to continue with DBT sessions, they will discuss frequency of sessions with their therapist, in addition to selecting type of sessions (individual and/or family skills).
Participants who elect not to continue with DBT sessions at the time of enrollment will retain the option of being able to request additional sessions at any point during the 12-month study.
Irrespective of participation in additional DBT sessions, all participants will be asked to complete follow-up interviews and questionnaires.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 6 months.
Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
|
18 months
|
|
Therapist satisfaction and acceptability
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Therapists will complete a questionnaire (Therapist Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire) assessing their satisfaction with the training and treatment approach at 6 months.
Acceptability will be defined as mean acceptability ratings > 5 ("acceptable") on a likert scale from 1 ("very unacceptable") to 7 ("very acceptable").
|
24 months
|
|
Therapists will adhere to the Dialectical Behavior Therapy Adherence Rating Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion (three years), an average of semi-annually.
|
Tapes will be rated for adherence using the Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Adherence Rating scale.
The scale generates a Global Score of DBT adherence and subscale scores for the 12 DBT strategy domains.
To examine sustained adherence, each therapist will submit 3 consecutive sessions for adherence coding.
The rating scale is not available to the public and is utilized by the DBT-Linehan Board of Certification (copyright).
Please see http://www.dbt-lbc.org/downloads/Applicant_Handbook_final_with_RW_review_2018.pdf for more information.
|
Through study completion (three years), an average of semi-annually.
|
|
Change in symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE)
Time Frame: 12 months to 18 months
|
The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) will provide a comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal picture of the symptomatic and psychosocial course and outcome of all participants in this study.
Scores range from 0-3 on certain disorders and 0-6 for other disorders.
High scores indicate high level of symptom impairment.
|
12 months to 18 months
|
|
Change in symptoms using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE)
Time Frame: 18 months to 24 months
|
The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) will provide a comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal picture of the symptomatic and psychosocial course and outcome of all participants in this study.
Scores range from 0-3 on certain disorders and 0-6 for other disorders.
High scores indicate high level of symptom impairment.
|
18 months to 24 months
|
|
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Time Frame: 12 months to 15 months
|
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS).
The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale with scores ranging from 0 to 3. High scores indicate higher level of symptoms.
|
12 months to 15 months
|
|
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Time Frame: 15 months to 18 months
|
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS).
The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale with scores ranging from 0 to 3. High scores indicate higher level of symptoms.
|
15 months to 18 months
|
|
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Time Frame: 18 months to 121 months
|
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS).
The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale with scores ranging from 0 to 3. High scores indicate higher level of symptoms.
|
18 months to 121 months
|
|
Change in hypo/mania symptoms using the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS)
Time Frame: 21 months to 24 months
|
Parent and adolescent reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS).
The CMRS is a valid 21-item screening instrument, reflecting the DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode, with each response rated on a four-point Likert-type scale with scores ranging from 0 to 3. High scores indicate higher level of symptoms.
|
21 months to 24 months
|
|
Change in suicidality using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: 12 months to 18 months
|
We will assess suicidal events (past and over follow-up) with the Pediatric Version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
The C-SSRS has sound psychometric properties, yields ratings of widely accepted definitions of youth suicidal events, and was used in other pediatric treatment trials yielding standardized outcomes to compare across studies.
This is a semi-structured interview that includes yes/no questions as well as narrative.
It captures number of suicidal events as well as type and severity.
|
12 months to 18 months
|
|
Change in suicidality using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: 18 months to 24 months
|
We will assess suicidal events (past and over follow-up) with the Pediatric Version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
The C-SSRS has sound psychometric properties, yields ratings of widely accepted definitions of youth suicidal events, and was used in other pediatric treatment trials yielding standardized outcomes to compare across studies.
This is a semi-structured interview that includes yes/no questions as well as narrative.
It captures number of suicidal events as well as type and severity.
|
18 months to 24 months
|
|
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Time Frame: 12 months to 15 months
|
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ).
Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
|
12 months to 15 months
|
|
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Time Frame: 15 months to 18 months
|
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ).
Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
|
15 months to 18 months
|
|
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Time Frame: 18 months to 21 months
|
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ).
Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
|
18 months to 21 months
|
|
Change in symptoms using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
Time Frame: 21 months to 24 months
|
Self-reported depressive and manic symptoms will be measured via the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ).
Responses are made on a 3-point scale ("0=not true", "1=sometimes true" and "2=true").
|
21 months to 24 months
|
|
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Time Frame: 12 months to 15 months
|
Adolescents will also complete the self-report Suicidal Ideation (SIQ), which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention.
Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
|
12 months to 15 months
|
|
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Time Frame: 15 months to 18 months
|
Adolescents will also complete the self-report Suicidal Ideation (SIQ), which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention.
Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
|
15 months to 18 months
|
|
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Time Frame: 18 months to 21 months
|
Adolescents will also complete the self-report Suicidal Ideation (SIQ), which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention.
Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
|
18 months to 21 months
|
|
Change in suicidality using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
Time Frame: 21 months to 24 months
|
Adolescents will also complete the self-report Suicidal Ideation (SIQ), which is intended to identify adolescents whose level of suicidal ideation is severe enough to warrant further intervention.
Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale (0= "I never had this thought" to 6="almost every day") and is used to indicate the frequency with which the adolescent experiences each thought.
|
21 months to 24 months
|
|
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Time Frame: 12 months to 15 months
|
Adolescents will also complete the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation.
Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10 percent" to 5= "almost always; 91-100 percent".
|
12 months to 15 months
|
|
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Time Frame: 15 months to 18 months
|
Adolescents will also complete the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation.
Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10 percent" to 5= "almost always; 91-100 percent".
|
15 months to 18 months
|
|
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Time Frame: 18 months to 21 months
|
Adolescents will also complete the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation.
Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10 percent" to 5= "almost always; 91-100 percent".
|
18 months to 21 months
|
|
Change in emotion regulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Time Frame: 21 months to 24 months
|
Adolescents will also complete the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire assessing emotional dysregulation.
Participants indicate how often each item applies to them on a scale from 1="almost never; 0-10 percent" to 5= "almost always; 91-100 percent".
|
21 months to 24 months
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Time Frame: 15 months
|
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.
This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
|
15 months
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.
This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
|
18 months
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Time Frame: 21 months
|
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.
This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
|
21 months
|
|
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (18-item)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Following the year-long DBT intervention, patients and parents will complete an 18-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.
This assesses clients' satisfaction of the service (responses range from quite dissatisfied to very satisfied) as well as whether or not the service addressed the clients' needs.
|
24 months
|
|
Change in symptoms using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV): Borderline Personality Disorder
Time Frame: 12 months to 18 months
|
Borderline and antisocial personality symptoms will be assessed using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality.
The SID-P uses a semi structured interview format to assess for symptoms of personality disorders.
Scores one each item range from 0 to 3 and high scores indicate symptoms of borderline personality disorder and levels of impairment.
|
12 months to 18 months
|
|
Change in symptoms using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV): Borderline Personality Disorder
Time Frame: 18 months to 24 months
|
Borderline and antisocial personality symptoms will be assessed using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality.
The SID-P uses a semi structured interview format to assess for symptoms of personality disorders.
Scores one each item range from 0 to 3 and high scores indicate symptoms of borderline personality disorder and levels of impairment.
|
18 months to 24 months
|
|
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
Time Frame: 12 months to 15 months
|
The Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS) is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD.
It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
|
12 months to 15 months
|
|
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
Time Frame: 15 months to 18 months
|
The Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS) is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD.
It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Item scores range from 0 to 4 and higher scores indicate higher affective lability.
|
15 months to 18 months
|
|
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
Time Frame: 18 months to 21 months
|
The Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS) is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD.
It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Item scores range from 0 to 4 and higher scores indicate higher affective lability.
|
18 months to 21 months
|
|
Change in affective lability using the Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS)
Time Frame: 21 months to 24 months
|
The Children's Affective Lability Scale (CALS) is a reliable 20-item adolescent- and parent-reported measure of mood lability, derived from the adult Affective Lability Scale that was specifically designed for adults with BD.
It yields a total score as well as an angry/depressed factor and a disinhibited/impersistent factor.
Item scores range from 0 to 4 and higher scores indicate higher affective lability.
|
21 months to 24 months
|
|
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation
Time Frame: 12 months to 18 months
|
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation (DBT-BTI) is a 26-item self-report survey that assesses barriers to DBT implementation in four domains: team, direction/motivation, theoretical position/philosophy, and administrative/structural problems.
It is a yes/no questionnaire and higher scores indicate higher challenges in implementation.
To be completed by DBT therapist participants.
|
12 months to 18 months
|
|
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation
Time Frame: 18 months to 24 months
|
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Barriers to Implementation (DBT-BTI) is a 26-item self-report survey that assesses barriers to DBT implementation in four domains: team, direction/motivation, theoretical position/philosophy, and administrative/structural problems.
It is a yes/no questionnaire and higher scores indicate higher challenges in implementation.
To be completed by DBT therapist participants.
|
18 months to 24 months
|
|
Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (name of scale)
Time Frame: 12 months to 18 months
|
Therapists will complete this well-validated and widely used measure, and is the only measure available that is designed to assess barriers and facilitators at each of the levels proposed within one instrument.
|
12 months to 18 months
|
|
Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (name of scale)
Time Frame: 18 months to 24 months
|
Therapists will complete the Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument which is a well-validated and widely used measure, and is the only measure available that is designed to assess barriers and facilitators at each of the levels proposed within one instrument.
It is a 16 item Likert scale questionnaire ranging from 1 to 6 with some items being reverse scored.
High scores generally indicate challenges to implementation.
|
18 months to 24 months
|
|
Implementation Climate Scale
Time Frame: 12 months to 18 months
|
The Implementation Climate Scale will enable the team to document relevant organizational processes the aid in implementation of this treatment and provide a context for other evidence-based treatment dissemination studies.
This is a Likert scale from 0 to 4 with low scores indicating challenges with implementation.
|
12 months to 18 months
|
|
Implementation Climate Scale
Time Frame: 18 months to 24 months
|
The Implementation Climate Scale will enable the team to document relevant organizational processes the aid in implementation of this treatment and provide a context for other evidence-based treatment dissemination studies.
This is a Likert scale from 0 to 4 with low scores indicating challenges with implementation.
|
18 months to 24 months
|
|
Change in therapist self-assessment
Time Frame: Every month for three years through study completion, an average of 36 months.
|
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Therapist Self-Assessment will allow for DBT therapists to provide subjective appraisals of their own level of comfort and confidence in applying the treatment.
It also assesses the need for additional supervision from the study supervisor, consultant, and/or peer.
Scores range from 1 to 7 on a Likert scale and high scores indicate high therapist level of comfort in implementing the treatment.
|
Every month for three years through study completion, an average of 36 months.
|
|
Number of therapy sessions
Time Frame: At the end of study completion (three years)
|
The DBT Therapy Tracking Form will be used to document the date of the therapy session, type of session, session duration, content, and scheduled date for next therapy visit.
This form will be completed by the DBT study therapist after each therapy session.
|
At the end of study completion (three years)
|
|
Frequency of therapy sessions
Time Frame: At the end of study completion (three years)
|
The DBT Therapy Tracking Form will be used to document the date of the therapy session, type of session, session duration, content, and scheduled date for next therapy visit.
This form will be completed by the DBT study therapist after each therapy session.
|
At the end of study completion (three years)
|
|
Type of therapy sessions
Time Frame: At the end of study completion (three years)
|
The DBT Therapy Tracking Form will be used to document the date of the therapy session, type of session, session duration, content, and scheduled date for next therapy visit.
This form will be completed by the DBT study therapist after each therapy session.
|
At the end of study completion (three years)
|
|
Reasons for continuing or not continuing in treatment
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Participants and study therapists will be asked to complete the Dialectical Behavior Therapy Continuation Questionnaire to assess reasons for continuing or not continuing to proceed with the DBT treatment.
Items are rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree)
|
12 months
|
|
Change in number of hours of supervision
Time Frame: At the end of study completion (three years)
|
The Therapist Supervision Hours Log will be completed by the DBT study therapist for all supervision received on study cases.
This form includes date of supervision, duration of supervision, and type of supervision.
|
At the end of study completion (three years)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 19, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 18, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
January 13, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 21, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
February 25, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 13, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 11, 2023
Last Verified
April 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 447-2019
- 151/2020 (Other Identifier: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Research Ethics Board)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder
-
ProgenaBiomeWithdrawnBipolar Disorder | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II Disorder | Bipolar Type I Disorder | Bipolar Disorder Mild | Bipolar Disorder Moderate | Bipolar Disorder SevereUnited States
-
Vielight Inc.Not yet recruitingBipolar Disorder (BD) | Bipolar | Bipolar Disorder DepressionCanada
-
Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.RecruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II DisorderUnited States
-
Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.Enrolling by invitationBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II DisorderUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterThe Texas Child Mental Health Care Consortium (TCMHCC)RecruitingBipolar Disorder Family Members | Bipolar Disorder (BD) | Bipolar Disorder I or II | Screening ToolUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of Colorado, Denver; University of Pittsburgh; University of Cincinnati and other collaboratorsRecruitingAdolescents | Bipolar Disorder (BD) | Bipolar Disorder I or II | Bipolar Disorder NOS | Bipolar Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterThe Ryan Licht Sang Bipolar FoundationCompletedBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Bipolar I Disorder | Bipolar Disorder I | Bipolar Affective DisorderUnited States
-
Babes-Bolyai UniversityRecruitingBipolar Disorder (BD)Romania
-
University of PittsburghNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionCompletedBipolar I Disorder | Bipolar II Disorder | Bipolar Disorder NOSUnited States
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Hospital Moinhos de VentoActive, not recruitingBipolar Disorder | Bipolar Depression | Major Depressive Disorder | Bipolar I Disorder | Affective Disorder | Bipolar II DisorderBrazil
Clinical Trials on Dialectical behavioral therapy
-
Bronx VA Medical CenterUnknown
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterWithdrawnSurgery | FractureUnited States
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthRecruitingBipolar DisorderCanada
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthRecruiting
-
University of ManitobaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Diabetes CanadaRecruitingPrevention | Type2DiabetesCanada
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreUniversity of PittsburghCompleted
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceCompletedAutism Spectrum DisordersFrance
-
University of WindsorRecruitingDepression | Mood Disorders | Stress | Anxiety | Depression - Major Depressive DisorderCanada
-
Duke UniversityCompleted
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyCompletedEmotional Regulation | AffectUnited States