Natural Cycle Versus Hormone Replaced Cycle

Natural Cycle Versus Hormone Replaced Cycle in Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

Recent sutdies indicate that the existence of corpus lutein in the ovary is a key point to prevent preeclampsia, and patients undergoing FET with hormone replaced cycle have no corpus lutein and the absence of corpus lutein significantly increases the risk of preeclampsia in these patients. We aim to conduct a single center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial to compare the live birth rate and gestational hypertention disease rate between the natural cycle and the hormone replaced cycle in women undergoing FET.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Recent sutdies indicate that the existence of corpus lutein in the ovary is a key point to prevent preeclampsia, and patients undergoing FET with hormone replaced cycle have no corpus lutein and the absence of corpus lutein significantly increases the risk of preeclampsia in these patients. We aim to conduct a single center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial to compare the live birth rate and gestational hypertention disease rate between the natural cycle and the hormone replaced cycle in women undergoing FET.

The investigators plan to enroll women scheduled for frozen-thawed cycles. Eligible participants will be randomised 1:1 to the natural cycle and the hormone replaced cycle for endometrium preparation. All other IVF procedures will be carried out following a routine method in each center. Women will be followed up until six months after randomisation for those who fail to get pregnant after the completion of the first embryo transfer or delivery for those who get pregnant after the embryo transfer. The primary outcome is live birth after the embryo transfer. Primary analysis will be by intention-to-treat analysis. A 10% live birth is considered to be valid. Considering 10% loss to follow-up with a significance level at 0.05 and a power of 80%, the investigators plan to recruit 960 women to demonstrate women treated with natural cycle have no inferiority regarding live birth rate than those treated with hormone replacement cycle.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 20 to 45 years old women;
  2. Scheduled to undergo frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
  3. Agreeing with the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hypertention disease before embryo transfer;
  2. Oocyte or sperm donated cycles
  3. Recurrent miscarriage (at least two miscarriage history)
  4. Ovulatory dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: natural cycle for endometrium preparation
patients will not receive oral contraceptive drugs for menstruation or drugs for ovulation induction before embryo transfer and patients will ovulate before embryo transfer
patients will not use oral contraceptive drugs
Other Names:
  • natural cycle
Active Comparator: hormone replaced cycle for endometrium preparation
patients will receive oral contraceptive drugs for menstruation before embryo transfer and patients will not ovulate before embryo transfer
patients will receive oral contraceptive drugs for menstruation before embryo transfer
Other Names:
  • hormone replaced cycle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Gestational hypertension rate
Time Frame: delivery
defined with blood pressure over 140/90 mmhg from gestational week 20 to delivery with or without other complications by the enrolled patients
delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The pre-eclampsia rate
Time Frame: From gestational week 20 to delivery
Preeclampsia is defined using the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists definitions (Gynecologists; and Pregnancy 2013)
From gestational week 20 to delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dan Zhang, M.D. Ph.D., Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared on reasonable request once the study has been complete

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From January 2022 onwards

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared on reasonable request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe