Concomitant Basal Joint Arthroplasty and Carpal Tunnel Release

Basal Joint Arthroplasty and Carpal Tunnel Release Comparing Single Versus Double Incision. Randomized Clinical Trial

Concomitant carpal tunnel syndrome and basal thumb junt osteoarthritis through a single incision has been described. Case serials have reported good with this technique. Nonetheless, there is a lack of comparative studies evaluating the effectivity and complications of single-incision versus double-incision technique. Only with an randomized clinical trial design it is possible to gain evidence about the advantages of one treatment method over another. The aim of the study is the comparison between two surgical techniques for concomitant carpal tunnel syndrome and basal thumb junt osteoarthritis: single versus double incision techniques.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Basal thumb joint osteoarthritis is a common disorder especially among postmenopausal women. In this specific subgroup of patients, radiographic signs appear in up to 40%.

Approximately 28% of those cases are symptomatic. Its pathoanatomy and treatment has been well described. Trapeziometacarpal joint is the most commonly joint requiring treatment for osteoarthritis in the upper extremity, often involving removing the trapezius. The same demographic group is also frequently affected by carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which coexists with basal joint arthritis in 18% to 46% of patients. In those cases, a combined surgical approach has been reported to be beneficial. The two conditions have traditionally been treated surgically through separate incisions.

a radial incision for trapeziectomy and standard midline volar carpal tunnel incision for median nerve decompression. Trapeziectomy has been proved to provide some degree of carpal tunnel decompression. However, as previous studies have suggested, release of the transverse carpal ligament should be performed in addition to basal joint arthroplasty incision, as trapeziectomy by itself does not completely decompress the carpal tunnel. The ability to decompress the carpal tunnel during basal joint arthroplasty using a single incision would allow to shorten surgery time, improve appearance, and potentially decrease morbidity compared to a staged or two-incision procedure. We sought to determine whether carpal tunnel release using a single incision during basal joint arthroplasty is as effective as two-incision approach in patients with concomitant CTS and basal thumb joint osteoarthrosis. The secondary hypothesis is that single incision prevents from morbidity associated to a second incision, such as pillar pain, longer surgical procedure, infection rate or necrosis of the skin bridge between incisions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Ignacio Esteban Feliu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant basal joint osteoarthritis and CTS in the ipsilateral extremity.
  • Severe CTS sympthoms wiht positive physical examination findings (eg, Phalen test and Tinel test).
  • Electromyography (EMG) results supporting the diagnosis of CTS.
  • Failed CTS nonsurgical treatment.
  • Basal joint osteoarthritis Eaton stage II or greater
  • Unacceptable pain localized in the basal joint appeared with activity, or reproduced by grind test or direct palpation
  • Failed basal joint osteoarthritis nonsurgical treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Acute trauma
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Hipothyroidism
  • Hyperthiroidism
  • Posttraumatic arthritis
  • Prior hand surgery procedures
  • Nerve compression at proximal level
  • Other nerve entrapments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Single incision
Carpal tunnel release and basal joint arthroplasty through a single radial approach
Group I: experimental - single incision The surgical technique chosen for thumb basal join was trapeziectomy with ligamentous reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), using flexor carpi radialis (FCR). Through a dorsal approach over trapeziometacarpal joint, the entire trapezium was excised. Volar traction of FCR allowed us to longitudinally incise the deep leaflet of FCR tendon until flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon was clearly visualized. Then, ulnar half of FCR tendon was harvested proximally through a second transverse incision in middle third of the forearm and split all the way to its insertion on the index metacarpal. A hole was placed in the base of the first metacarpal and FCR tendon was routed through the bone canal and then fixed with non-reabsorbable sutures. Finally, the tendon remanent was rolled up and placed into the trapezial void to act as a spacer.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Double incision
Double approach: carpal tunnel release through palmar approach and basal joint arthroplasty through radial approach
Group II: active comparator - double incision Trapezial excision and ligament reconstruction were performed in the same way as in group I, except that FCR deep leaflet was not incised. After radial incision wound closure, carpal tunnel release was performed through a second separate longitudinal palmar incision.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of CTS symptoms intensity
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively

To assess the CTS symptoms intensity, patients filled out the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionaire. This questionnaire evaluates symptom's severity (11 items) and functional status (8 items) (1: no complaints, 5 maximum complaints possible).

Minimum score is 19 and maximum 95.

Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of hand function
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Hand function was assessed through Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH). Minimum score is 0 (no disability) and maximum 100 (total disability).
Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Change of hand pain
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Pain was assessed through 10-visual analog scale. Minimum score is 0 (no pain) and maximum 10 (sever pain).
Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Change of grip strength
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Grip strength was measured the mean of 3 attempts, in kilograms, with correction for hand dominance, using a standard dynamometer.
Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications associated with the different surgical procedures
Time Frame: At 2 weeks posteoperatively
Complications such as pillar pain, longer surgical procedure, infection rate or necrosis of the skin bridge between incisions
At 2 weeks posteoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Carpal tunnel release and basal joint arthroplasty through single incision

3
Subscribe