- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04553367
Effect of Bronchoscopy on the Outcome of Patients With Severe Sepsis With ARDS and Complicated by VAP From Prolonged Ventilation
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
age group between 18-65 years, intubated and ventilated patients due to respiratory failure from severe lung infection and/or traumatic lung contusion [respiratory failure was diagnosed by arterial blood gases (ABG) with partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) ≤60 mmHg, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)≥60 mmHg, PH > 7.30, respiratory rate >25 min]. All patients ventilated for 4 days with CMV with respiratory rate 12/min, PEEP 5 cm/H2O, FIO2 adjusted to maintain arterial oxygen saturation above 90%. And sedated with both fentanyl and midazolam intravenous infusion to adjust sedation level to achieve Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) -2 to -3 as illustrated in table. All patients received broad spectrum antibiotics in form of meropenem 1 gm slowly intravenous every 8 hours in this period (four days) and a qualitative sputum culture collected from all patients after 3 days from ventilation. Feeding started on the second day of ventilation to all patients through feeding pump at rate of 70 ml insure plus (Abbot company) with 1.47 kilo-calorie/ml to supply patients with approximately 2500 kilo-calorie in 24 hours calculated by approximately 35 kilo-calorie/kg. The 5 points of bundle for pneumonia prevention were strictly applied to all patients: Elevation of the head of the bed 30º to 45º, Daily evaluation for possible ex-tubation, The use of endotracheal tube with subglottic secretion drainage, oral care with oral antiseptics, initiation of safe enteral nutrition, within 24-48 hours from ICU admission and ventilation.
200 patients included in our study from those who showed no improvement and still had respiratory failure and completed ventilation for 4 days and fulfilled > 2 parameters on SOFA score and > 6 on pneumonia score and randomly allocated in two groups 100 patients in each. Randomization sequence was created using Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) with a 1:1 allocation using random block sizes of 2 and 4 by an independent doctor. In this way, sequence generation and type of randomization can be expressed at the same time.
All patients selected underwent a percutaneous tracheostomy on the same day. Sepsis documented in our study by > 2 on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. While VAP documented in our study by >6 on CPIS score. Only patients of group B had three times bronchoscopy according to our protocol one at the end of first 5 days, second bronchoscopy at the end of the second 5 days and last one at the end of the studied period to confirm both clinical and bacteriological cure. Bronchoscopy done with the following precautions: we used flexible bronchoscopy Olympus BF-160 adult size, patients kept sedated with both midazolam and fentanyl infusion to get same sedation score mentioned before (RASS-2/-3), increase FIO2 to 100% during the procedure, use xylocaine spray 10% by Astra Zeneca company 2 puffs in each nostril before application of the rubber tube of the bronchoscope, keep patient's head elevated 20 degree during procedure, use CMV mode with previous mentioned parameters with 100% FIO2 during the procedure, 4 syringe of normal isotonic saline used for wash every one 10 ml and suction done immediately after injection, suction of the fluid and small airway secretion after only the first injection of isotonic saline syringe used for BAL and sent for qualitative culture and the other isotonic saline injected in the remaining three syringe used only for wash the small airways and not for bacteriological sampling, monitoring of patients during the procedure done by SPO2, non-invasive blood pressure measurement every 5 minutes, electro cardiac gram for heart rate, clinical assessment of depth of sedation every 5 minutes.
Duration of the study selected to be 2 weeks and evaluation of all patients in both groups done on three periods, at the end of the first 5 days, at the end of the second 5 days and at the end of last 4 days.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ta'if, Saudi Arabia, 21944
- King abd el Aziz specialist hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with age group between 18-65 years,patients Respiratory failure, patients with pneumonia
Exclusion Criteria:
- pediatric patients, patients with anoxic brain insult
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Group A
patients of group A Continue on the conventional way of ventilation and .
Microbiological results collected from patients of group A through qualitative sputum.
|
all patients in both groups receive meropenam and put on the ventilators for 2 weeks
ventilator
|
Active Comparator: Group B
had three times bronchoscopy one at the end of first 5 days, second bronchoscopy at the end of the second 5 days and last one at the end of the studied period to confirm both clinical and bacteriological cure.
Bronchoscopy done with the following precautions: we used flexible bronchoscopy Olympus BF-160 adult size, patients kept sedated with both midazolam and fentanyl, 4 syringe of normal isotonic saline used for wash every one 10 ml and suction done immediately after injection, suction of the fluid and small airway secretion after only the first injection of isotonic saline syringe used for BAL and sent for qualitative culture
|
all patients in both groups receive meropenam and put on the ventilators for 2 weeks
ventilator
Only patients of group B had three times bronchoscopy according to our protocol one at the end of first 5 days, second bronchoscopy at the end of the second 5 days and last one at the end of the studied period
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
number of patients weaned from the ventilator
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
those who had improvement in all parameters of sepsis (SOFA score) and improvement in (CPIS) score
|
2 weeks
|
number of patients disharged from ICU
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Those who weaned from the ventilator and recoverd from sepsis
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ICU-40-20
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Septic Shock
-
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)University Hospital, BonnUnknownSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockGermany
-
University Medicine GreifswaldUnknownSepsis Septic ShockGermany
-
McMaster UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); The Physicians' Services Incorporated...Recruiting
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedSeptic Shock HyperdynamicFrance
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
National Taiwan University HospitalBaxter Healthcare CorporationRecruiting
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityUnknown
-
University of ZurichCompletedPatients in Septic ShockSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Meropenem
-
Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedSepsis | Critical Illness | Septic Shock | Morality | Pharmacokinetic | Carbapenem | Pharmacodynamic | Clinical Outcome | Organ Failure, MultipleThailand
-
Austin HealthCompleted
-
Unity Health TorontoSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; University of TorontoTerminatedCystic Fibrosis Pulmonary ExacerbationCanada
-
Oslo University HospitalRecruiting
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Completed
-
Qingtao ZhouCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedLate Onset Neonatal Sepsis
-
Joseph KutiThrasher Research FundCompletedPneumonia | Cystic Fibrosis | Pseudomonas Aeruginosa InfectionUnited States
-
Hannover Medical SchoolUnknownLiver Cirrhosis | Peritonitis BacterialGermany