Evaluation of mediVR-KAGURA Guided Therapy

August 14, 2022 updated by: Masahiko Hara, Japan Society of Clinical Research

Evaluation of mediVR-KAGURA Guided Therapy: A Prospective Interventional Study

The objective is to evaluate mediVR-KAGURA guided therapy for the treatments of physical and cognitive dysfunctions regardless of baseline disease in a prospective interventional design.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The patients sit on an upright chair, wear a head-mounted display (HMD) and grab two handheld controllers in a motion-tracked three-dimensional space called "room scale" of the mediVR-KAGURA (mediVR, Inc. Toyonaka City, Osaka, Japan). mediVR-KAGURA can provide users with >90 frames per second (fps) graphic operation with an approximately 110° viewing angle and accurate three-dimensional tracking technology.

First, we evaluate conventional and maximum reaching distances at 0°, 45°, and 90° level surface for the left hand (0L, 45L, 90L) and at 90°, 135°, and 180° level surface for the right hand (90R, 135R, or 180R) for calibration in a sitting position. During rehabilitation, patients are instructed to touch a fixed objects or catch a falling objects at the pre-specified height and distance levels in each degree. Horizontal distances were classified into three categories, namely long, middle, and short which were calculated using the following formulas: 0.9 * maximum reaching distance, 0.9 * (conventional + maximum reaching distances)/2, and conventional reaching distance respectively. A falling object disappeared at a 20 cm height for safety if the patients missed to catch it. The purpose of reaching hands was to stimulate and break down body trunk balance, and to train participants to balance for stable walking. By thinking about the timing and distance and recognizing the next targets repeatedly, cognitive function was simultaneously stimulated for dual-task training.

The 7 parameters of the rehabilitation programs can be set like as follows: (1) distance (short, middle or long), (2) direction (0L, 45L, 90L, 90R, 135R, or 180R), (3) height of object, (4) size of object (center or outline), (5) size of sensing sphere of the controller, (6) falling speed of the square box (from 0 to 300 cm/s), and (7) intervals for each task. Participants first underwent practical programs to familiarize themselves with mediVR-KAGURA guided rehabilitation, followed by rehabilitation programs. Provision of the rehabilitation programs will be personalized.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hyogo
      • Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan, 6650066
        • Cloud Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 110 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with physical and/or cognitive dysfunctions
  2. Agreed to the participation of this study with written informed consent by themselves or guardians

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Inappropriate candidates at attending physician's discretion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention group
Single arm (all participants receive interventions)
Approximately 20 min mediVR KAGURA-guided rehabilitation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Timed up and go test
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. Shorter score means a better outcome. The minimum value could be 5 seconds or less, and the maximum value could be infinity (cannot complete the test).
baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
Change in Trail Making Test
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. Shorter score means a better outcome. The minimum value could be 15 seconds or less, and the maximum value could be infinity or be defined as 300 seconds when patients cannot complete the test.
baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is an assessment tool that aims to evaluate the functional status of patients throughout the rehabilitation process following a stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury or cancer. Higher score means a better outcome. The minimum value is 18, and the maximum value is 126.
baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
Changes in Berg balance scale
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
The Berg Balance Scale (or BBS) is a widely used clinical test of a person's static and dynamic balance abilities. Higher score means a better outcome. The minimum value is 0, and the maximum value is 56.
baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
Changes in Mini Mental State Examination
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) test is a 30-point questionnaire that is used extensively in clinical and research settings to measure cognitive impairment. Higher score means a better outcome. The minimum value is 0, and the maximum value is 30.
baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
Changes in Self Rating Depression Scale
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention
The Self Rating Depression Scale (SDS) is a psychiatric measuring instrument having descriptive words and phrases that indicate the severity of depression for a time period. Lower score means a better outcome. The minimum value is 20, and the maximum value is 80.
baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the first intervention, average of 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Masahiko Hara, MD, PhD, Cloud Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 31, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe