SNAGs in Mechanical Neck Pain

November 5, 2020 updated by: Sharick Shamsi, Raj Nursing and Paramedical College

Efficacy of SNAGs in the Management of Mechanical Neck Pain

Neck pain is second largest cause of disability worldwide. Chronic neck pain prevalence is 14% which is somewhat higher in females as compared to males. In India reported prevalence is 6%. Therapeutically, neck pain is managed by physiotherapists using rest, stretching and strengthening exercises, educating patient, and intense proprioception and positional exercises.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

To determine the evidences for the efficacy of SNAGs in the Management of Mechanical Neck Pain.

100 patients [Age group 25-45 yrs] who were diagnosed with neck pain, with onset ˃1-3 months (chronic) were randomly assigned to group A receiving conventional Physiotherapy plus SNAGs and group B receiving conventional Physiotherapy plus ultrasound.

Subjects in-group A that received conventional Physiotherapy plus SNAGs showed greater Improvement in pain and range of motion compared with the conventional Physiotherapy plus ultrasound group on 2nd week compared with pretreatment.

The result of study suggests that both SNAGs and Ultrasound groups improves the symptoms of neck pain. Ultrasound group improved the pain symptoms but was too small to reach satisfactory outcome for patients. Based on these results conventional Physiotherapy plus SNAGs should be the treatment of choice for neck pain rather than conventional Physiotherapy plus Ultrasound .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Age group between 20- 45 years.
  • Both Gender male and female.
  • Individuals having localized pain or stiffness in spine or both combined b/w C3 to C7 without upper limbs radiculopathy.
  • Pain reported on VAS score ˃3 in neck region.
  • Patients agree to sign written consent form.

Exclusion Criteria Patients were excluded if they were diagnosed with following conditions for ˃6 months:

  • T.B, carcinoma, heart disease, osteoporosis.
  • Neural disorders due to PIVD.
  • Any trauma or localized infection in neck region.
  • Upper MND, cervical stenosis, metabolic diseases in bone and joint.
  • Hyper flexibility
  • Open sores,
  • Ongoing radiotherapy, chemotherapy, steroid therapy or anticoagulants.
  • Psychiatric diseases such as phobia/obsession, depression.
  • Allergy to hot pack
  • Patients with history of surgery in cervical spine region with in a year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mean and standard deviations of age and height between group A and B
100 subjects with a mean age of 30.82±6.75 (group A, 31.42±6.67; group B, 30.82±6.82) ranging from 20 to 45 years, with a mean height of 165.52±7.85 (group A, 164.92±7.79; group B, 166.12±7.87) centimeters
Other Names:
  • Hot Pack, Exercise
Experimental: Between group comparison of VAS, NDI and ROM
VAS, NDI and Neck ROM between two groups were compared at pretest (0 day) and posttest (end of two weeks)
Other Names:
  • Hot Pack, Exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Visual analog scale is a subjective outcome measurement where patients judge the intensity of their pain on a scale of 0-10, which is in the form of a 10cm straight line. On this 0-10 scale, zero denotes no pain and ten denotes severe pain intensity.
2 weeks
Neck Range of motion
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Range of motion of the cervical spine measured by bubble inclinometer. It consists of a 360-degree scale with a fluid filled circular tube containing a small air bubble. It is a gravity dependent Goniometer, which uses the gravity's effect on fluid level to measure joint position and motion.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck disability Index
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Neck disability Index contains 10 items, seven related to activities of daily living, two related to pain, and one item related to concentration. Each item is scored ranging from 0 (no pain or disability) to 5 (severe pain and disability); and the total score is expressed as a percentage, with higher scores corresponding to greater disability.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RajNursingParamedicalC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound Therapy, SNAGs

Subscribe