Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Postoperative Crohn's Disease

October 24, 2022 updated by: Elina Jokinen, Tampere University Hospital
This pilot study aims to detect possible trends or signals suggesting efficacy of FMT on prevention of delay of POR, to determine the safety of FMT in post operative CD, and asses if a full randomised controlled trial is feasible in this setting. With microbiota analysis we aim to assess if changes in gut microbiota are related to disease course of CD after operation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years
  • Able to provide written consent
  • Stricturing and/or fistulizing Crohn's disease needing ileocecal or ileal resection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Active infection, abscess or fistula at the time of the first colonoscopy
  • Life expectancy <1 year
  • Unable to provide written consent
  • Use on antibiotics or probiotics at the time of first colonoscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
FMT via colonoscopy
Placebo Comparator: Plasebo
Water infusion via colonoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in endoscopic Rutgeerts score between first and second colonoscopy
Time Frame: 1 year
Rutgeerts endoscopic score ranges from i0 indicating remission to i4 indicating severe post-operative relapse. Cut off value > i1 will be used to compare number on patients in intervention group and in placebo group.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of FMT using FinFMT-Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, 5 years
Unvalidated survey including 20 questions.
3 months, 12 months, 5 years
Clinical activity of Crohn's disease using Harwey-Bradshaw Index
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 5 years

Scores of less that 5 indicate that the patient's Crohn's disease is in remission while scores higher than 16 indicate severe disease activity.

Median scores will be compared between intervention group and placebo group.

6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Histologic activity of Crohn's Disease using modified Global Histological Activity Score
Time Frame: 1 years, 5 years
The GHAS consists of eight items assessing acute and chronic inflammatory changes, epithelial damage and the extent of inflammation (i.e. the proportion of biopsy specimens affected). Each of the eight items is scored, with the totals subsequently added together. Maximum number 14 indicates histological activity. The median GHAS score will be compared between intervention group and placebo group.
1 years, 5 years
Change of microbiota in stool samples and in intestinal biopsies
Time Frame: 6 weeks,12 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 years
The relative abundances of taxonomic units in cases versus controls and different time points will be compared at the level of phylum, class, genus, species and OTU. Alpha diversity measures will be determined from the original unfiltered dataset by counting observed taxa (OTU richness) and by Chao1, ACE, Shannon, Simpson and Fisher indices; diversity will be compared between time points.cases and controls. Beta diversity will be assessed by examining the results of principle component analysis using multiple distance methods, if appreciable difference between cases and controls or time points will be noted, formal testing of clustering will be performed. To simplify complex bacteriome profiles, we will also sort each sample into enterotypes based on the leading components of their bacteriomes; the enterotypes will be tested as a predictor of the case-control or disease status of cases.
6 weeks,12 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 years
Patient reported outcome
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 48 weeks,years 5
IBD symptom index (IBD-SI) questionnaire. Minimum number of points 0 indicating remission, maximum number of points 15 indicating active disease or flare.
12 weeks, 48 weeks,years 5
Change in inflammatory marker CRP mg/l
Time Frame: 6 weeks,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 years
Median in intervention group versus plasebo group
6 weeks,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 years
Need for hospitalization
Time Frame: Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year and 5 years
Avarage number of days spent in hospital in intervention group vs. plasebo group
Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year and 5 years
Need for treatment escalation
Time Frame: Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year and 5 years
Number of patients needing treatment escalation from thiopurines to TNF alfa blockers in intervention group versus plasebo group
Through study completion, an avarage of 1 year and 5 years
F-calpro microg/g
Time Frame: 6 weeks,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 years
Median in intervention group versus plasebo group
6 weeks,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 years
Hb mg/l
Time Frame: 6 weeks,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 years
Median in intervention group versus plasebo group
6 weeks,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crohn Disease

Clinical Trials on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

3
Subscribe