CUHK Jockey Club Tech-based Stroke Rehabilitation Programme - ARR

November 17, 2020 updated by: Raymond KY Tong, Chinese University of Hong Kong

CUHK Jockey Club Tech-based Stroke Rehabilitation Programme - Augmented Reality (AR) Rehabilitation Training System

The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust has supported CUHK to launch a three-year project 'CUHK Jockey Club HOPE4Care Programme' to implement four evidence-based advanced rehabilitation technologies in 40 local elderly day care centres and rehabilitation centres, to benefit the community.

Our research team had developed the "Augmented Reality (AR) Rehabilitation Training System" that can be used as tools for rehabilitation by individuals who have suffered from a stroke or elderly. The system facilitates an active rehabilitative exercise.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of ischemic brain injury or intracerebral haemorrhage shown by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography after the onset of stroke;
  • Motor impairment in upper-limb, lower-limb, and/or balance;
  • No or mild spasticity on the lower-limb or upper-limb (MAS≤2);
  • Have sufficient cognition to follow the instructions provided by the rehab system.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any additional medical or psychological condition that would affect their ability to comply with the study protocol, e.g., a significant orthopaedic or chronic pain condition, major post-stroke depression, epilepsy, artificial cardiac pacemaker / joint;
  • Severe shoulder or arm contracture/pain;
  • Severe knee or hip contracture/pain
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Augmented Reality
The system provides visual and audio feedback which makes the rehabilitation training process more relaxing, interesting and convenient to guide the patients performing appropriate upper-limb, lower-limb exercises and balance training.
The system can capture useful biomechanical data accurately, such as the location of body centre of mass (COM), the body joint angles, and the body posture. These useful data are stored in a database and can be conveniently accessed by the therapists, which facilitate the follow-up of the patients' therapeutic progress.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Three months after the last training session
Berg Balance Scale (BBS), consists of 56-level measures to examine balance ability and to predict falling risk with high reliability (ICC=0.98) (Steffen, Hacker & Mollinger, 2002). Stroke patients were assessed based on their performance on 14 simple mobility tasks, including transfer, standing, and reaching
Three months after the last training session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Three months after the last training session
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), consists of 4-level scale to examine joint spasticity based on muscle tone and resistance detected during passive stretching with good inter-rater reliability (ICC =0.85) (Bohannon & Smith, 1987).
Three months after the last training session
Functional Ambulation Category Test
Time Frame: Three months after the last training session
Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC) is a reliable measurement of independent walking ability on level-ground walking and stair ambulation, which is a good prediction of independent community walking post-stroke (Mehrholz, et al., 2007). FAC consists of 6-level scale: patients with FAC=4 requires supervision in level ground walking, FAC=5 requires supervision only when walking on non-level surface such as stairs.
Three months after the last training session
Timed 10-meter Walk Test
Time Frame: Three months after the last training session
Timed 10-Meter Walk Test (10mWT), measures comfortable and fast walking speeds in short distance. The ability to increase walking speed above a comfortable pace suggests the capability to adapt to varying environments, such as crossing street, with high reliability (ICC=0.90-0.96) (Flansbjer, et al., 2005). Average walking speed of healthy elderly subjects ranges in 0.6m/s-1.4m/s, and can increase to 21%-56% above the comfortable pace for faster walking speed
Three months after the last training session
6 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Three months after the last training session
Six-Minute Walk Test (SMWT), measures the maximum walking distance covered in fixed duration as a sub-maximal test of endurance and aerobic capacity. The measurement of 6MWT is highly correlated to FAC (Mehrholz, et al., 2007) with good reliability (ICC=0.94-0.96) (Steffen, Hacker & Mollinger, 2002).
Three months after the last training session
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
Time Frame: Three months after the last training session
The WMFT measures upper limb ability through timed and functional tasks. It has 17 items, ranging from 0 to 5 (worse to best).
Three months after the last training session
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Three months after the last training session
The ARAT has total 19 items, divided into 4 categories (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). It ranges from 3 to 0 (best to worse).
Three months after the last training session
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: Three months after the last training session

Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper-Extremity the maximum score is 66, divided into 33 items in the form of a 3-point scale (0-2), 0 is cannot perform and 2 performs fully.

Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower-Extremity consists of 34-level cumulative scoring system to examine lower-limb functions of hemiplegic stroke patients quantitatively through a set of lower-limb movement tasks in reflex, flexor/extensor synergy, volitional movement, coordination and speed (Fugl-Meyer, et al., 1975).

Three months after the last training session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raymond Tong, PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation Training System

Subscribe