Prevalence, Incidence and Characteristics of NAFLD/NASH in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (NAFLDIA1)

March 3, 2022 updated by: Christophe De Block, University Hospital, Antwerp

Prevalence, Incidence and Characteristics of NAFLD/NASH in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Obtained Via a Non-invasive Screening Protocol

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a condition characterized by intrahepatic fat accumulation. It is closely related to insulin resistance. To date, it remains unclear whether NAFLD is common in patients with type 1 diabetes or if NAFLD translates into an increased health burden in this population. Screening for NAFLD is challenging due to the limitations of non-invasive diagnostic tools.

Liver biopsy remains the gold standard but is not suited for routine screening or clinical studies. Therefore, there is a great demand for accurate non-invasive screening tools that can not only diagnose but also stage NAFLD. This study aims to generate a large cohort of thoroughly characterized type 1 diabetes patients screened for NAFLD using multiple non-invasive tools including MRI, ultrasound, controlled attenuation parameter, and score panels. We aim to generate a biobank to promote a research collaboration network in the field of non-invasive diagnosis of NAFLD.

A secondary endpoint is to investigate the potential correlation between the presence of NAFLD and the occurrence of micro-or macrovascular complications in patients with diabetes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to characterize and follow a thoroughly characterized cohort of adult type 1 diabetes patients free from secondary liver disease due to excessive alcohol usage, viral hepatitis, alfa-1 antitrypsin deficiency, Wilson's disease or steatogenic or hepatotoxic drug use.

The investigators will screen for NAFLD and fibrosis using multiple non-invasive techniques including

  • ultrasound
  • controlled attenuation parameter
  • fatty liver index
  • human steatosis index
  • transient elastography
  • FIB-4
  • NAFLD fibrosis score
  • NASH algorithm based on multiple parameters

Subjects will be screened for microvascular and microvascular complications with:

  • ECG
  • microfilament examination
  • 24hour urine collection for microalbuminuria
  • serum kidney test (creatinine, eGFR)
  • fundoscopy
  • peripheral arterial pulsation palpation

The investigators will subsequently thoroughly characterize various metabolic and anthropometric parameters and document any microvascular or macrovascular complications.

The patients will be annually rescreened for both NAFLD-related as cardiovascular variables. Therefore this study will assess the correlation between NAFLD, cardiovascular risk, and type 1 diabetes in a prospective manner.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

700

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Antwerp
      • Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium, 2650
        • Recruiting
        • Antwerp University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult type 1 diabetes patients followed in the outpatient diabetes clinic of the Antwerp University Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Adult age
  • Informed consent given

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary liver disease
  • Excess alcohol usage
  • Pregnancy
  • Use of steatogenic medication
  • Active cancer or oncological treatment
  • History of organ transplantation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
NAFLD + type 1 diabetes
type 1 diabetes patient with NAFLD on screening
ultrasound to check for NAFLD according to Saverymuttu criteria
elastography to compare liver stiffness indices
CAP is a non-invasive additive on Fibroscan (trademark) which can quantify hepatic steatosis
the FLI is a score panel designed to screen for NAFLD
the FIB-4 is a score panel designed to screen for significant fibrosis
the NFS is a score panel designed to screen for significant fibrosis
noNAFLD + type 1 diabetes
type 1 diabetes patient without NAFLD on screening
ultrasound to check for NAFLD according to Saverymuttu criteria
elastography to compare liver stiffness indices
CAP is a non-invasive additive on Fibroscan (trademark) which can quantify hepatic steatosis
the FLI is a score panel designed to screen for NAFLD
the FIB-4 is a score panel designed to screen for significant fibrosis
the NFS is a score panel designed to screen for significant fibrosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of NAFLD in type 1 diabetes: percentage of patients with indices of liver steatosis and/or NASH and/or fibrosis.
Time Frame: one year
Determination of the cross-sectional prevalence of NAFLD in a cohort of type 1 diabetes patient (population size approximately 1000 subjects) according to ultrasound criteria, FLI≥60, HSI≥36, controlled attenuation parameter >215dB/m (M-probe) or ≥250 dB/m (XL probe) and MRI-PDFF >5% hepatocyte steatosis (reference method). All measures will be performed in a combined and standardized protocol to explore their diagnostic accuracy (see outcome 4).
one year
Incidence of NAFLD in type 1 diabetes.
Time Frame: five years
Incidence of NAFLD in type 1 diabetes determined by new cases of NAFLD according to ultrasound criteria, FLI≥60, HSI≥36, controlled attenuation parameter >215dB/m (M-probe) or ≥250 dB/m (XL probe) or MRI-PDFF >5% hepatocyte fat infiltration (reference method)
five years
correlation of NAFLD with microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus: odds ratio to have prevalent complications in NAFLD and diabetes compared to diabetes without NAFLD
Time Frame: one year
The correlation between indices of microvascular (neuropathy assessed by microfilament test, nephropathy assessed by microalbuminuria rate and retinopathy assessed by fundoscopic criteria) or macrovascular (non-fatal ischemic coronary disease, non-fatal cerebrovascular disease, non-fatal peripheral artery disease, or mortality due to cardiovascular disease) complications will be compared between groups with and without NAFLD as determined by the abovementioned screening tools.
one year
Association of NAFLD with microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus: odds ratio to develop in NAFLD and diabetes compared to diabetes without NAFLD in subjects with no prior complications
Time Frame: five years
The association between indices of microvascular (neuropathy assessed by microfilament test, nephropathy assessed by microalbuminuria rate and retinopathy assessed by fundoscopic criteria) or macrovascular (non-fatal ischemic coronary disease, non-fatal cerebrovascular disease, non-fatal peripheral artery disease or mortality due to cardiovascular disease) complications will be assessed between groups with and without NAFLD, but all without prior micro- or macrovascular disease as determined by the abovementioned screening tools.
five years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tools for NAFLD in type 1 diabetes: comparison of AUROC and diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: five years
The investigators will compare the abovementioned non-invasive tools to diagnose and grade liver steatosis and fibrosis with the predefined gold standard (MRI-PDFF for steatosis and magnetic resonance elastography for fibrosis). Correlations and agreement statistics will be performed for each index. Using regression analysis, a new specific algorithm will be developed based on cohort-specific cutoffs. Using longitudinal data, a prediction score will be determined to predict NAFLD occurrence or NAFLD progression.
five years
Natural history of NAFLD in type 1 diabetes
Time Frame: five years
Timewise description of the progression of quantitative indices of liver steatosis and fibrosis on the abovementioned tools (ultrasound, score systems, elastography) to assess the natural evolution of NAFLD. Every year this assay will be performed. MRI-PDFF will be performed in 5 years as a reference method to mark the five-year follow-up window
five years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christophe De Block, M.D., PhD, Universiteit Antwerpen
  • Principal Investigator: Sven Francque, M.D., PhD, Universiteit Antwerpen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

monocentric study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on ultrasound

3
Subscribe