Gender-related Characteristics of Bladder Cancer Treatment (BladderBLOG)

December 22, 2020 updated by: Donata Villari, University of Florence

Gender-related Characteristics of Bladder Cancer Treatment. Therapeutic Offer, Pathologic Features and Survival Outcomes of Patients Treated With Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

The most frequent cancer of the urinary tract is the bladder cancer (BC), in Italy its incidence reaches the 7% of all the new diagnosis of cancer, accounting for the fifth cause of death in the western countries, overall 140.000 new cases per year in Europe. In the year 2017, the Italian association for medical oncology (AIOM) recorded in our country about 21.700 new diagnosis of BC men and 5.300 in women. This data show not only a relevant gender disparity on the disease incidence (in 5th to 7th decade male incidence: 11-12% of all new diagnosis of cancer versus 1% in women) but also on the outcomes of treatment. Overall, the 30% of all the new diagnosis have a muscle-invasive (MIBC) onset, the female gender suffer a correlation with a more advanced disease at the time of first diagnosis. As a consequence, men have lower BC-related mortality when compared to women (p<0,001). This discrepancy in the mortality rate has been investigated by many authors, resulting in the evidence that female gender suffers higher risks, especially during the first two-years after the radical cystectomy. A comprehensive explanation has not been formulated yet, but a multiplicity of cofactors, including variations in the hormone receptors and tumor biology as well as the different anatomy between male and female, have been identified as potentially relevant. Another important issue in the pre-operatory management of female patients with BC is the misleading interpretation of hematuria. It seems to directly correlate with the evidence that women suffer a more advanced stage at diagnosis, and this element has been withheld in the list of relevant risk factors for prognosis. Nevertheless, a thorough analysis of their effect will only be possible in the future, as well-designed prospective and randomized clinical trials are currently not available.

A part from the preoperatory disparity, it has also been described that men are more frequently candidates to an orthotopic urinary diversion, leading female patients to an irreversibly altered perception of personal integrity and body image, namely to a lower quality of life after radical cystectomy. The female anatomy has been considered as a limitation to continence recovery, resulting in preoperative counselling more frequently against in favor of ileal conduit or not-continent urinary diversions.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • FI
      • Firenze, FI, Italy, 50100
        • Recruiting
        • Donata Villari

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients treated with radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient undergoing radical cystectomy since September 2016 December 2020
  • Development of bladder cancer confirmed histologically
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Lack of clinical and prognostic data on selected patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
gender-related discrepancies in the treatment offer for patients affected by MIBC from September 2016 to December 2020
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
gender-related difference in the clinical and pathologic features of MIBC
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
gender-related difference in the survival outcomes
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
gender-related difference in the risk factors for development of BC
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Subscribe