Acupuncture at the Sphenopalatine Ganglion in the Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

September 12, 2023 updated by: weiming wang, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Effect of Acupuncture at the Sphenopalatine Ganglion in the Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an immunoglobulin E-mediated inflammatory disease1 caused by hypersensitivity of the immune system to an allergen, affecting 100 million people in Europe 2and 400 million of the global population.The etiology of AR is multifactorial, resulting primarily from genetic predisposition, immunological response, and environmental pollutants.AR traditionally has been classified as seasonal (SAR) or perennial (PAR) depending on the causes and duration of symptoms. Some patients with AR prefer complementary and alternative medicine for their symptoms, with nearly 20% receiving acupuncture. According to the updated practice parameter of rhinitis in 2020, the use of acupuncture for the treatment of AR was not recommended due to a lack of well-controlled studies.

The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG), located under a thin (1-2 mm) layer of mucosa in the pterygopalatine fossa, consists of sensory fibers that innervate the nasopharynx, nasal cavity, and palate.Several studies have reported the benefit of SPG stimulation in chronic cluster headache and acute ischaemic stroke. Compared with traditional acupoints selected on basis of traditional meridian theory, acupuncture at SPG(inserting a needle through SPG acupoint (near ST7, Xiaguan) to reach and directly stimulate the SPG) may help patients ameliorate nasal symptoms immediately and improve quality of life by increasing sympathetic nerve excitability, but the evidence is inconclusive.

We have designed this three-armed, randomized trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture at SPG for the treatment of SAR. We hypothesize that acupuncture at SPG plus rescue medication is superior to sham acupuncture plus RM and RM alone in the treatment of SAR.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • No.731 Hospital of China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation
        • Contact:
          • Hui Chen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years and ≤ 75 years;
  2. History of moderate to severe SAR symptoms (Visual analog scale(VAS) >50 mm, range, 0 cm[not at all bothersome] to 100 mm[extremely bothersome]) for more than 4 days/weeks, and more than 4 consecutive weeks with at least two years' duration;
  3. Positive skin prick test to grass and birch pollen or/and serum-specific IgE test;
  4. Ability to complete the medical information form and sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History or current evidence of perennial allergic rhinitis, acute sinusitis, allergic asthma, pneumonia; autoimmune disorders, or severe chronic inflammatory diseases;
  2. History of nasal rhinopolypus or abnormalities;
  3. Intake of antihistamines, anticholinergics, corticosteroids, decongestants, or antibiotics during the 1 month prior to beginning the study;
  4. History of systemically administered corticosteroids within 6 months or specific immunotherapy, allergy desensitization therapy within 1 year before enrollment;
  5. Serious uncontrolled blood coagulation disorder, cardiovascular disorder, severe hepatic/renal insufficiency or mental disorder;
  6. Pregnancy or planning for pregnancy;
  7. Known allergy, or contraindication to rescue medication or related drugs;
  8. Known phobia to acupuncture or having received acupuncture treatment, or sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation or other complementary and alternative medicine within 1 months prior to enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acupuncture group
Sterile single-use stainless steel needles (size 0.35 mm × 55 mm) (YiDaiFu brand, Suzhou Tianyi Acupuncture Instrument Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) will be utilized. Participants in lateral position, the acupoints area will be sterilized with 75% alcohol. To stimulate SPG, the needles will be inserted in the medial superior anterior direction to a depth of approximately 55 mm33 until the participants report a special sensation radiating toward the nose or the upper teeth. After that, the needle will be withdrew slightly. The needles will be retained for 30 minutes after three stimulation. Rescue medication are permitted when participants feel that their symptoms are intolerable.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo acupuncture group
The acupuncture procedure will be similar to that of the acupuncture group. After sterilizing the skin, the 0.35 × 25 mm disposable needle will be vertically inserted at SPG acupoint about 3-5 mm. No needle manipulation will be conducted to avoid the deqi response. Rescue medication are permitted when participants feel that their symptoms are intolerable.
Other: Rescue medication
Participants in the rescue medication group do not receive acupuncture treatment during the study period. They will be only allowed to use rescue medication. They have the option of 4 weeks (up to 8 sessions) of acupuncture free of charge at the end of the follow-up period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change from baseline in the average daily Combined Symptoms and Medication Score (CSMS) over weeks 1- 4
Time Frame: weeks 1-4
The average daily Combined Symptoms and Medication Score (CSMS) is the sum of the daily symptom score (dSS) plus daily medication score (dMS) . The dSS contains a 6-item scale referring to nasal symptoms (4 items) and ocular symptoms (2 items), with each item scored using a Likert scale of 0 to 3. The dSS will be calculated as a mean of all non-missing dSS divided by the number of individual symptoms (range, o to 3). The dMS will again be calculated as an average of daily symptom relief medication score, with a range of 0 to 3.
weeks 1-4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change from baseline in the average daily Combined Symptoms and Medication Score (CSMS) over weeks 5- 8 and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
Time Frame: over weeks 5- 8 and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
The average daily Combined Symptoms and Medication Score (CSMS) is the sum of the daily symptom score (dSS) plus daily medication score (dMS) . The dSS contains a 6-item scale referring to nasal symptoms (4 items) and ocular symptoms (2 items), with each item scored using a Likert scale of 0 to 3. The dSS will be calculated as a mean of all non-missing dSS divided by the number of individual symptoms (range, o to 3). The dMS will again be calculated as an average of daily symptom relief medication score, with a range of 0 to 3.
over weeks 5- 8 and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
Change in the average daily symptom score (dSS) and daily medication score (dMS) from baseline over weeks 1- 4, weeks 5-8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
Time Frame: over weeks 1- 4, weeks 5-8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
The daily symptom score (dSS) contains a 6-item scale referring to nasal symptoms (4 items) and ocular symptoms (2 items), with each item scored using a Likert scale of 0 to 3. The dSS will be calculated as a mean of all non-missing dSS divided by the number of individual symptoms (range, o to 3). The daily medication score (dMS) will again be calculated as an average of daily symptom relief medication score, with a range of 0 to 3.
over weeks 1- 4, weeks 5-8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
The proportion of participants with a minimum of 23% improvement in average daily Combined Symptoms and Medication Score (CSMS) from baseline over weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 in the first year and at the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
Time Frame: over weeks 1- 4, weeks 5-8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
A difference of 23% on the average daily Combined Symptoms and Medication Score (CSMS) was chosen to demonstrate a minimum clinically important difference.
over weeks 1- 4, weeks 5-8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
Change in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaires (RQLQ) total score and subscale scores from baseline to the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
Time Frame: At the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
The RQLQ is a well-established and validated questionnaire consisted of 28 questions covering 7 domains: sleep (3 items), practical problems (3 items), non-nasal and eye symptoms (7 items), nasal symptoms (4 items), eye symptoms (4 items), activities that have been limited by nose or eye symptoms (3 items), and emotional function (4 items). Each item will be evaluated on a 7-point rating scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (severe impairment) during the previous week.
At the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
Change in the Visual analog scale score for the overall allergic symptoms severity from baseline to the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
Time Frame: At the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
Patients will be asked to grade the severity of allergic symptoms using the self-rated 0-100mm Visual analog scale (0, no symptoms, to 100, worst-ever symptoms, in 1-point increment).
At the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
A global evaluation in comparison to previous years by each participant at the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
Time Frame: At the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
Each participant will be asked the following question: ''Compared to your symptoms in previous grass pollen seasons, how have you felt overall in this grass pollen season? (Tick only one)". The possible answers are coded as follows:1, "Very much better"; 2, "Much better"; 3, "A little better"; 4, "No change"; 5, "A little worse"; 6, "Much worse"; and 7, "Very much worse".
At the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
Patient global evaluation of improvement at the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year.
Time Frame: At the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
Patient global evaluation of improvement will be rated by the participants using a 7-point Likert scale with the following options: 1, "Very much better"; 2, "Much better"; 3, "A little better"; 4, "No change"; 5, "A little worse"; 6, "Much worse"; and 7, "Very much worse" at each study visit.
At the end of weeks 4 and 8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
The average weekly number of medication-free days during weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 in the first year.
Time Frame: during weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 in the first year
The average weekly number of medication-free days during weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 in the first year will be compared among three groups
during weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 in the first year
The average weekly number of symptom-free days during weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 in the first year.
Time Frame: during weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 in the first year
The average weekly number of symptom-free days during weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 in the first year will be compared among three groups
during weeks 1-4, weeks 5-8 in the first year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants' expectation about therapeutic benefits from acupuncture
Time Frame: At baseline
Participants in the acupuncture and placebo acupuncture groups will be asked the following question: "How helpful you believe the acupuncture modality you received would be for your allergic rhinitis?"
At baseline
The proportion of participants remained blinded to treatment arm in acupuncture and placebo acupuncture groups.
Time Frame: Five minutes after the end of the last treatment in the fourth week,
Each participant in the acupuncture and placebo acupuncture groups will be asked the following question: "Which treatment do you think you have received (acupuncture or placebo acupuncture)?"
Five minutes after the end of the last treatment in the fourth week,
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: during weeks 1-8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year
Any potential adverse events (AEs) will be monitored and documented in the CRFs within 24 hours after their occurrence during the treatment and follow-up period. According to their potential association with acupuncture, AEs will be categorized as acupuncture-associated AEs (e.g., subcutaneous hemorrhage, dizziness, fainting, serious pain, and local infection fainting, localized hematoma), and non-treatment-related AEs.
during weeks 1-8 in the first year and the first week following symptoms onset in the second year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Weiming Wang, MD,PhD, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Clinical Trials on Acupuncture group

3
Subscribe