An Imaging Technology, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography, in Predicting Breast Cancer

January 19, 2024 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for the Evaluation and Targeted Biopsy of Suspicious Mammographic Architectural Distortions

This clinical trial examines a new imaging technology, contrast-enhanced mammography, in predicting breast cancer. Contrast-enhanced mammography is similar to standard mammography, but it includes an intravenous (by vein) injection of iodine-based contrast, which makes tissue and blood vessels more visible in scans. Contrast-enhanced mammography may work better in detecting cancer in the breast that is not seen on other imaging tests and may help doctors find the most suspicious areas of the breast to biopsy, which could increase the chances of finding breast cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To evaluate the added value of contrast enhancement of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in predicting invasive malignancy or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in patients with suspicious mammographic architectural distortion (MAD)s.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of CEM versus FFDM, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and ultrasound (US) in predicting invasive malignancy or DCIS in patients with suspicious MADs.

II. To evaluate whether the presence of enhancement on CEM correlates with the visibility of MAD on FFDM and DBT, or DBT only, and with the probability of malignancy.

III. To estimate the proportion of cases in which CEM changes the original target for a stereotactic biopsy.

IV. To evaluate the cancer detection rate and the outcomes (need for additional imaging, biopsies, and final pathologic results) of incidental CEM findings.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate the correlation of blood biomarkers and the presence of invasive cancer and DCIS on pathology in the study patients.

II. To evaluate the role of CEM enhancement pattern in choosing a precise target for a stereotactic biopsy.

III. To develop an objective method of quantifying the degree of enhancement above background using AI-based digital image analysis.

IV. To evaluate the technical feasibility of using CEM-guided or CEM-directed stereotactic biopsies in patients with suspicious MADs.

V. In patients who undergo CEM targeted or CEM directed biopsy we will evaluate the upgrade rate of DCIS to invasive malignancy or high-risk lesions to DCIS or invasive cancer for those patients who will require surgery as a part of their routine clinical care.

VI. To compare the performance of FFDM (obtained as a part of the recent prior screening or diagnostic mammographic work-up) and LE CEM images (obtained as a part of the CEM study) in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of invasive cancer and high-grade DCIS.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive iodine-based contrast agent intravenously (IV) and the undergo CEM over 10-15 minutes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Olena Weaver

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with suspicious MADs recommended for a stereotactic biopsy who underwent their diagnostic imaging work-up resulting in a biopsy recommendation at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) or at an outside facility with a technically acceptable quality of diagnostic mammography, and who are planning to have their biopsy at MDACC
  • Age 25-85 years
  • Willing to participate in the study, undergo an IV placement, able to undergo iodinated contrast injection, and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reported history of an allergic reaction to iodinated contrast
  • History of anaphylactic reaction to any substance
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Pregnancy or lactation within 6 months
  • Breast surgery affecting the site of interest within prior 6 months
  • Breast biopsy at the site of interest within the last 2 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diagnostic (iodine-based contrast, CEM)
Patients receive iodine-based contrast agent IV and the undergo CEM over 10-15 minutes.
Ancillary studies
Undergo biopsy
Other Names:
  • Bx
  • BIOPSY_TYPE
Undergo CEM
Other Names:
  • CEM
Given IV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Will examine the accuracy of CEM compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in predicting invasive malignancy or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in patients with mammographic architectural distortion (MAD)s.
Up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of CEM, FFDM, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and ultrasound (US) in predicting invasive malignancy or DCIS
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Will compare the sensitivity of CEM with that of FFDM, DBT, and US in predicting invasive malignancy or DCIS by using McNemar's test.
Up to 3 years
Specificity of CEM, FFDM, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and US in predicting invasive malignancy or DCIS
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Will compare the specificity of CEM with that of FFDM, DBT, and US in predicting invasive malignancy or DCIS by using McNemar's test
Up to 3 years
Negative predictive value of CEM, FFDM, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and US in predicting invasive malignancy or DCIS
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Positive predictive value of CEM, FFDM, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and US in predicting invasive malignancy or DCIS
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Degree of enhancement on CEM
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Will examine the degree of enhancement on CEM and its correlation with the visibility of MAD on FFDM and DBT, or DBT only, and with the probability of malignancy.
Up to 3 years
Proportion of cases in which CEM changes the original target for a stereotactic biopsy
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
We will estimate the proportion of cases in which CEM changes the original target along with an exact 95% confidence interval.
Up to 3 years
Cancer detection rate
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Will examine cancer detection rate and the outcomes (need for additional imaging, biopsies, and final pathologic results) of incidental CEM findings.
Up to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olena Weaver, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-0031 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2021-03404 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

3
Subscribe