Cyclosporine vs Steroids in DRESS

November 28, 2023 updated by: Scott Worswick, University of Southern California

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Cyclosporine vs Steroids in DRESS

Current treatments for patients with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) include supportive care, steroids and cyclosporine. No randomized controlled trial (RCT) exists in comparing these treatments and all available literature comes in the form of case reports and case series. These two treatments are considered standard of care and this trial seeks only to compare outcomes of DRESS between these two therapies. No additional labs, therapies or procedures will be used apart from those that are routinely done for patients with this diagnosis.

This will be a pilot study to determine efficacy of the two therapies with particular endpoints in mind so that the investigators can study the safety of these two therapies in patients with DRESS.

Data suggests a potential benefit for adults with DRESS using either steroids or cyclosporine but the investigators are seeking a comparison of efficacy of these two therapies. The study population will include adults with a Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) score of greater than 4 (i.e. a likely diagnosis of DRESS). The investigators will exclude patients with sepsis, active Hepatitis B or C, active tuberculosis, a documented allergy to steroids or cyclosporine, and patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 (unless on dialysis in which case the participants will be included).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Current treatments for patients with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) include supportive care, steroids, cyclosporine and to a lesser extent, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Regarding IVIG, a recent case series suggests no improved benefit in adults. No randomized controlled trial (RCT) exists in comparing these treatments and all available literature comes in the form of case reports and case series. These two treatments are considered standard of care and this trial seeks only to compare outcomes of DRESS between these two therapies. No additional labs, therapies or procedures will be used apart from those that are routinely done for patients with this diagnosis.

This will be a pilot study to determine efficacy of the two therapies with particular endpoints in mind so that the investigators can study the safety of these two therapies in patients with DRESS. Hopefully, this study will allow the investigators to better power a full prospective trial in the future.

This is a potentially life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) with significant potential morbidity. Data suggests a potential benefit for adults with DRESS using either steroids or cyclosporine but the investigators are seeking a comparison of efficacy of these two therapies. The study population will include adults with a Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) score of greater than 4 (i.e. a likely diagnosis of DRESS). The investigators will exclude patients with sepsis, active Hepatitis B or C, active tuberculosis, a documented allergy to steroids or cyclosporine, and patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 (unless on dialysis in which case the participants will be included).

Participants will be randomized using a randomization protocol at all sites. Primary endpoints will include percentage of participants with complete or near complete resolution of organ involvement as well as erythema resolution at day 7 and day 30.

Secondary endpoints will be:

  1. fever presence, resolution of facial edema, resolution of pruritus, lymphadenopathy, eosinophil count at days 7 and 30
  2. days of hospitalization
  3. mortality at days 7, 30 and 90
  4. viral reactivation at days 30, 60 and 90
  5. those with autoimmune development by day 30 and day 90
  6. 30 day re-admission rate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • USC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults with a RegiSCAR score of greater than 4 (i.e a likely diagnosis of DRESS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active sepsis
  • Active hepatitis B or C
  • Active tuberculosis
  • Documented allergy to steroids or cyclosporine
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 (unless on dialysis, in which case they will be included)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cyclosporine

All Patients start with 5 mg/kg/day (3 mg/kg/day if renal impairment) PO divided bid for 7 days (or IV if patient is NPO)

  1. If complete resolution, stop cyclosporine and monitor closely for relapse

    a. If patient relapses, give 5 (3 if renal impairment) mg/kg/day PO divided bid PO for 7 days

    i. If down-trending, start oral taper regimen

    ii. If not down-trending, switch to steroid arm

  2. If >25% improvement and labs are down-trending, start the oral taper regimen.
  3. If 0-25% improvement, give 5 (3 if renal impairment) mg/kg/day PO divided bid for 3 days

    1. If down-trending, start oral taper regimen
    2. If not down-trending, switch to steroid arm
  4. If no improvement or up-trending labs at 7 days, switch to steroid arm

Oral Taper Regimen set as 3 mg/kg PO divided bid for 14 days, then 2 mg/kg PO divided bid for 20 days. If renal impairment, oral taper regimen set as 2 mg/kg PO divided bid for 14 days, then 1 mg/kg PO divided bid for 20 days

Patients randomized to cyclosporine will be treated as mentioned under "Arm/Group Description"
Experimental: Corticosteroids

All Patients start with 500 mg IV Methylprednisolone for 3 days

1. If >25% improvement (must be >25% in all involved organs), start the taper regimen 2. If 0-25% improvement (in ≥1 involved internal organ), give 500 mg IV Methylprednisolone for 4 days

  1. If no improvement, switch to cyclosporine arm of treatment
  2. If 0-25% improvement, give 500 mg IV Methylprednisolone for 3 days

i. If labs are down-trending, start the taper regimen

ii. If labs are not down-trending, switch to cyclosporine arm of the study

c. If >25% improvement, start the taper regimen

Taper Regimen set as:

  1. 125 mg IV Methylprednisolone x3 days
  2. 1.2 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week
  3. 1 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week
  4. 0.8 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week
  5. 0.6 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week
  6. 0.4 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week
  7. 0.2 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week
  8. 0.1 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week
  9. 0.05 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week
All patients randomized to steroids will initially be treated with IV methylprednisolone and eventually started on an oral prednisone taper.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with complete or near complete resolution of organ involvement at day 30, on steroid therapy and cyclosporine therapy
Time Frame: Day 7

Measured by the following quantitative metrics:

  • Creatinine within 1.25x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher
  • Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) within 1.5x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher
  • Troponin-T, Creatine Kinase Myocardial Band (CK-MB), Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP), and lipase within 1.25x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher
  • Resolution of interstitial pneumonitis on chest x-ray
Day 7
Percentage of patients with complete or near complete resolution of organ involvement at day 30, on steroid therapy and cyclosporine therapy
Time Frame: Day 30

Measured by the following quantitative metrics:

  • Creatinine within 1.25x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher
  • Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) within 1.5x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher
  • Troponin-T, Creatine Kinase Myocardial Band (CK-MB), Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP), and lipase within 1.25x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher
  • Resolution of interstitial pneumonitis on chest x-ray
Day 30
Percentage of patients with complete or near complete resolution of erythema at day 7, on steroid therapy and cyclosporine therapy
Time Frame: Day 7
Clinical measurement of erythema
Day 7
Percentage of patients with complete or near complete resolution of erythema at day 30, on steroid therapy and cyclosporine therapy
Time Frame: Day 30
Clinical measurement of erythema
Day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with resolution of fever
Time Frame: Day 7
Less than 38 degrees Celsius for at least 24 hours
Day 7
Percentage of patients with resolution of fever
Time Frame: Day 30
Less than 38 degrees Celsius for at least 24 hours
Day 30
Percentage of patients with resolution of facial edema
Time Frame: Day 7
Clinical resolution of edema for at least 24 hours
Day 7
Percentage of patients with resolution of facial edema
Time Frame: Day 30
Clinical resolution of edema for at least 24 hours
Day 30
Percentage of patients with resolution of pruritus
Time Frame: Day 7
Resolution for at least 24 hours
Day 7
Percentage of patients with resolution of pruritus
Time Frame: Day 30
Resolution for at least 24 hours
Day 30
Percentage of patients with resolution of lymphadenopathy
Time Frame: Day 7
Clinical resolution of lymphadenopathy for at least 24 hours
Day 7
Percentage of patients with resolution of lymphadenopathy
Time Frame: Day 30
Clinical resolution of lymphadenopathy for at least 24 hours
Day 30
Absolute eosinophil proportion compared to peak value
Time Frame: Day 7
Proportion of absolute eosinophils
Day 7
Absolute eosinophil proportion compared to peak value
Time Frame: Day 30
Proportion of absolute eosinophils
Day 30
Patients with autoimmune disease development
Time Frame: Day 30
Measured by titers of autoimmune markers (Antinuclear Antibody (ANA), Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)) compared to baseline
Day 30
Patients with autoimmune disease development
Time Frame: Day 90
Measured by titers of autoimmune markers (Antinuclear Antibody (ANA), Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)) compared to baseline
Day 90
Total days of hospitalization after initial dermatology consult
Time Frame: 0-120 days
Number of days
0-120 days
Viral reactivation
Time Frame: Day 30
Measured by titers of Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)
Day 30
Viral reactivation
Time Frame: Day 60
Measured by titers of Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)
Day 60
Viral reactivation
Time Frame: Day 90
Measured by titers of Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)
Day 90
Mortality
Time Frame: Day 7
Proportion of patient mortality
Day 7
Mortality
Time Frame: Day 30
Proportion of patient mortality
Day 30
Mortality
Time Frame: Day 90
Proportion of patient mortality
Day 90
30-day readmission rate
Time Frame: Day 30
Proportion of patients re-admitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge
Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on DRESS Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Cyclosporine

3
Subscribe