Efficacy and Tolerance of Nova22007 Versus Vehicle in Patients With Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC)

November 12, 2021 updated by: Santen SAS

Phase II/III, Multicenter, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel Group, Dose Ranging, Controlled Trial of Efficacy and Tolerance of Nova22007 (Cyclosporine A [CSA] 0.05% & 0.1% Ophthalmic Cationic Emulsion) Versus Vehicle in Patients With VKC

The primary objective of this study is:

  • To assess the efficacy of Nova22007, a cyclosporine A (CsA), 0.05% and 0.1% versus vehicle in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) after a 4-week treatment period.

The secondary objectives of this study are:

  • To compare the safety and ocular tolerance of Nova22007 0.05% and 0.1%;
  • To assess the long term safety and ocular tolerance of Nova22007 0.05% and 0.1%; and
  • To assess the decrease in frequency of concomitant artificial tears use.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75018
        • Groupe hospitalier Bichat-Claude Bernard

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least the two following signs, in at least one eye* (the same eye should fulfill both criteria):

    • Presence of giant papillae with a diameter ≥ 1 mm on the upper tarsal conjunctiva AND
    • Superficial keratitis
  • At least two of the following ocular symptoms with a score > 2 in at least one eye*: burning/stinging, tearing, itching, pain, sticky eyelids, foreign body sensation, mucus discharge, and photophobia.
  • Hyperemia score equal to or greater than 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant corneal ulcer of infectious origin.
  • Active ocular herpes
  • Disease that could possibly interfere with the interpretation of the study results: active uveitis (defined by Tyndall score > 0), previous history of ocular hypertension or glaucoma, or condition incompatible with the frequent assessments needed by the study.
  • Active herpes.
  • History of malignancy or a recurrence in the last 5 years.
  • Abnormality of nasolacrimal drainage apparatus.
  • Concomitant disease not stabilized within 1 month before Screening Visit (e.g. diabetes with glycemia out of range, trouble with thyroid secretions, etc.) or judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study (e.g. current systemic infections), or condition incompatible with the frequent assessments needed by the study.
  • Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the investigational medicinal products (IMP) or test products.
  • Severe systemic allergy requiring systemic treatment at study entry.
  • Female of childbearing potential.
  • History of drug or alcohol addiction (> 50g/day, 5 glasses alcohol/day).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NOVA22007 0.05%
four times daily
Experimental: NOVA22007 0.1%
four times daily
Sham Comparator: Vehicle
administered four times daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Rating of Subjective Symptoms of VKC in Period I
Time Frame: Week 4

The primary criteria of the trial was the overall rating of subjective symptoms in ocular symptoms of VKC as compared to Baseline and assessed at Week 4 (Month 1) based on a five-point scale based on BenEzra trial (BenEzra 1986):

  1. = Overall worsening of the subjective findings.
  2. = No change in the symptoms.
  3. = Slight improvement with the child still unable to participate in all normal daily activities.
  4. = Marked improvement despite temporary mild itching or mucus discharge.
  5. = Completely free of all symptoms.
Week 4
Overall Rating of Objective Symptoms of VKC in Period I
Time Frame: Week 4

Overall rating of objective signs was to be assessed under the slit lamp by the Investigator and recorded on a five-point scale based on BenEzra trial (BenEzra 1986):

  1. Intense congestion of conjunctival vessels, perilimbal injection, or corneal involvement with the papillary proliferations more extensive or similar to the situation recorded before treatment in at least one of the eyes.
  2. The overall condition was assessed as better than before treatment in both eyes.
  3. Total re-epithelialisation of the cornea although slight conjunctival and perilimbal hyperaemia and papillary proliferations remains in both eyes.
  4. Only slight conjunctival hyperaemia without perilimbal injection or papillary proliferations in at least one eye
  5. Both eyes were quiet with no papillary proliferations or conjunctival or perilimbal injection.
Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean Daily Number of Unpreserved Artificial Tears Instillations in Period I
Time Frame: Up to Month1
Up to Month1
Ocular Tolerance in Period I
Time Frame: Up to Month1
Are the tested eye drops (other than concomitant tear substitute ) comfortable?
Up to Month1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David BenEzra, Pf, Haddassah University Hospital
  • Study Director: Christophe Baudouin, Pf., Hôpital des XV-XX 28 rue de Charenton 75012 Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 22, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Conjunctivitis, Vernal

Clinical Trials on Vehicle

3
Subscribe