Cardio-visual Stimulation in Augmented Reality for Pain Reduction (HEART)

The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an Augmented Reality (AR) biofeedback intervention to alleviate pain symptoms in individuals suffering from chronic pain of the hand and/or the forearm.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chronic pain is a major public health problem with implications for high health care costs, lost productivity and an estimated financial burden of $500 billion. Individuals with chronic pain are also at an increased risk of developing an opioid use disorder.

Chronic pain has previously been associated with a distorted body representation, in particular of the affected body parts. Virtual Reality (VR) studies using embodiment-, respiration-, and heart-beat related feedback have demonstrated positive effects for induced pain in healthy participants (e.g., increased pain thresholds) and chronic pain in patient populations (e.g., decreased subjective pain, improved functionality, improved physiological markers of pain). Based on these studies, the AR intervention evaluated here aims to alleviate subjective pain symptoms and improve physiological pain markers in chronic pain patients using heartbeat-related feedback.

This within-subject study will compare subjective pain ratings before, during, and after an AR intervention that provides visual feedback of participants' on-going heartbeat in relation to their affected limb. Primary outcomes include subjective reports from participants (perceived efficacy, acceptability, and demand) and the intervention's clinical feasibility, including reports from therapists. Secondary outcomes include changes in heart rate and variability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nancy, France, 54000
        • Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be over 18 years of age
  • Present permanent chronic pain (for more than 3 months), secondary to a peripheral pathology (traumatic, orthopedic or neurological), located in the hand or forearm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • People in emergency situations
  • Persons unable to give informed consent
  • Persons who are mentally or linguistically unable to understand the research test instructions
  • Individuals who are not available to complete the entire study protocol
  • Cognitive impairments that prevent the use of the equipment
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Patients with seizure disorders
  • Patients with central hemineglect
  • Pain secondary to central nervous system pathology
  • Patients with arrhythmia
  • Patients with head tremors or head shaking.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental 1: HEART - Placebo - HEART - Placebo

The patient receives visual feedback in an augmented reality environment in four session, over two weeks.

Week 1: HEART, Placebo (after >24hour washout) Week 2: HEART, Placebo (after >24hour washout)

In an augmented reality environment, the patient receives visual feedback in synchrony with their cardiac-cycle (HEART)
In an augmented reality environment, the patient receives visual feedback out-of-synchrony with their cardiac cycle (Placebo)
Experimental: Experimental 2: HEART - Placebo - Placebo - HEART

The patient receives visual feedback in an augmented reality environment in four session, over two weeks.

Week 1: HEART, Placebo (after >24hour washout) Week 2: Placebo, HEART (after >24hour washout)

In an augmented reality environment, the patient receives visual feedback in synchrony with their cardiac-cycle (HEART)
In an augmented reality environment, the patient receives visual feedback out-of-synchrony with their cardiac cycle (Placebo)
Experimental: Experimental 3: Placebo - HEART - Placebo - HEART

The patient receives visual feedback in an augmented reality environment in four session, over two weeks.

Week 1: Placebo, HEART (after >24hour washout) Week 2: Placebo, HEART (after >24hour washout)

In an augmented reality environment, the patient receives visual feedback in synchrony with their cardiac-cycle (HEART)
In an augmented reality environment, the patient receives visual feedback out-of-synchrony with their cardiac cycle (Placebo)
Experimental: Experimental 4: Placebo - HEART - HEART - Placebo

The patient receives visual feedback in an augmented reality environment in four session, over two weeks.

Week 1: HEART, Placebo (after >24hour washout) Week 2: Placebo, HEART (after >24hour washout)

In an augmented reality environment, the patient receives visual feedback in synchrony with their cardiac-cycle (HEART)
In an augmented reality environment, the patient receives visual feedback out-of-synchrony with their cardiac cycle (Placebo)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in perceived pain
Time Frame: change in pain rating will be evaluated when participants first wear the Head-Mounted Display (baseline), after 3 minutes of video-passthrough (Pre), after 3 minutes of cardio-visual stimulation (post), after 3 minutes of video-passthrough (final)
The patient moves a cursor on a Visual Analog Scale to indicate their currently perceived level of pain. The gauge ranges from "no pain" (0) to "worst pain imaginable" (10).
change in pain rating will be evaluated when participants first wear the Head-Mounted Display (baseline), after 3 minutes of video-passthrough (Pre), after 3 minutes of cardio-visual stimulation (post), after 3 minutes of video-passthrough (final)
Change in Heart-Rate Variability (time domain)
Time Frame: a change in heart-rate variability will be evaluated between baseline (pre), intervention, and immediately following intervention (post)
time-domain metrics of heart-rate variability [ms]
a change in heart-rate variability will be evaluated between baseline (pre), intervention, and immediately following intervention (post)
Change in Heart-Rate Variability (frequency domain)
Time Frame: a change in heart-rate variability will be evaluated between baseline (pre), intervention, and immediately following intervention (post)
frequency-domain metric of heart-rate variability (power)
a change in heart-rate variability will be evaluated between baseline (pre), intervention, and immediately following intervention (post)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Questionnaire
Time Frame: The first day of the study
Questionnaire on the sensations, usability, and satisfaction with the augmented reality stimulation using a Visual Analog Scale (0-10) where higher scores indicate agreement with the questionnaire item.
The first day of the study
Questionnaire
Time Frame: The second day of the study
Questionnaire on the sensations, usability, and satisfaction with the augmented reality stimulation using a Visual Analog Scale (0-10) where higher scores indicate agreement with the questionnaire item.
The second day of the study
Questionnaire
Time Frame: The third day of the study
Questionnaire on the sensations, usability, and satisfaction with the augmented reality stimulation using a Visual Analog Scale (0-10) where higher scores indicate agreement with the questionnaire item.
The third day of the study
Questionnaire
Time Frame: The fourth day of the study
Questionnaire on the sensations, usability, and satisfaction with the augmented reality stimulation using a Visual Analog Scale (0-10) where higher scores indicate agreement with the questionnaire item.
The fourth day of the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean Paysant, Pr, UGECAM Nord Est

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRR-CLP-2019-4

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Regional Pain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on HEART

Subscribe