Comparison of Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block

Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block on Postoperative Acute Pain in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has become a common procedure in thoracic surgery. Severe postoperative pain may be encountered in patients undergoing VATS. Analgesic methods such as thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), intercostal block, serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and erector spina plane block (ESPB) are widely used for VATS. Among these methods, ultrasound (US) guided TPVB is the most preferred method. In recent years, the frequency of application of plane blocks as a component of multimodal analgesia has been increased. ESPB and SAPB are some of them. There are two techniques for SAPB application. In Deep SAPB (DSAPB) application, local anesthetic agent is given under the serratus anterior muscle. In the Superficial SAPB (SSAPB) application, the local anesthetic agent is given above the serratus anterior muscle. The mechanisms of regional analgesia techniques used after thoracic surgery operations are also different from each other. Therefore, in this study, the analgesic efficacy of two different methods, DSAPB and SSAPB, will be compared.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ankara
      • Kecioren, Ankara, Turkey, 06000
        • Ankara Atatürk Chest Disease and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II-III
  • Body mass index between 18-30 kg/m2
  • Patients undergoing elective video assiste thoracoscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusing the procedure
  • History of chronic analgesic therapy
  • History of local anesthetic allergy
  • Infection in the intervention area
  • Patients with bleeding disorders
  • Emergency surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block
Following the visualization of the anatomical structures, the nerve block needle will be advanced via the in-plane technique beneath the serratus anterior muscles until the interfascial space was reached. After hydrodissection with 2 ml normal saline, 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into the area.
Deep serratus anterior block and superficial serratus anterior plane block will be applied to the patients under real-time ultrasound guidance.
Active Comparator: Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block
Following the visualization of the anatomical structures, the nerve block needle will be advanced via the in-plane technique above the serratus anterior muscles until the interfascial space was reached. After hydrodissection with 2 ml normal saline, 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into the area.
Deep serratus anterior block and superficial serratus anterior plane block will be applied to the patients under real-time ultrasound guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Scores
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Pain will be assessed at rest and while coughing using the visual analog scale on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Pain assessment will be done at 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 16th, 24th and 48th hours after surgery.
48 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine Consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Morphine consumption for 24 hours will be recorded
24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Two different blocks with same local anesthetic volume

Subscribe