Biofeedback Gait Retraining for Stiff Knee Gait Correction

Biofeedback Gait Retraining for Stiff Knee Gait Correction: Multi-joint Adaptation in Children and Young Adults With Brain Injury

The research team has developed a visual kinematic biofeedback system which is designed to help children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP) correct a pattern of reduced knee extension in terminal swing and early stance. The system provides real-time feedback on the knee angle pattern during walking on a treadmill. From a pilot study on children with CP, the investigators observed that when the system was used in children who have stiff knee gait (SKG), training with knee feedback alone could lead to an increase in hip flexion which in turn led to limited normalization of the knee pattern through the whole gait cycle. This study, funded by the NIDILRR Switzer grant (PI: X Liu, Ph.D.), seeks to address the question of whether a training design with feedback on both the knee and hip joints would reduce this tendency to generate unintended changes in hip joint motion, and in doing so also improve convergence to the intended knee joint pattern. This study will test ten children and young adults with brain injury who have SKG and examine their short term adaptations to two types of kinematic feedback training: feedback training on the knee alone (condition B) and sequential switched feedback training on the knee and the hip (condition A). An additional sensor placed on the pelvis will be added to the current feedback system for measurement and feedback on the hip joint angle. Software enhancements will also be made with methods that will allow study and description of adaptations in measures of inter-limb symmetry during training. The participants will visit twice with a 2-week washout period between the two visits. Five participants will first undergo condition B in the first visit and then condition A in the second visit, while the other five participants will start with condition A in the first visit and then undergo condition B in the second visit. To compare the effects of the conditions on normalizing the joint angle trajectories, the knee and hip kinematics will be collected and analyzed in both the conditions. To investigate the coordination of lower limb segments under feedback training, relative phase measures will be analyzed on the hip and the knee. To examine whether participants adapt to the feedback retraining in terms of improvement in gait quality, symmetry ratios will be analyzed.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Brain Injury
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Sequential switched feedback training on the knee and the hip (Condition A); Other: Feedback training on the knee alone (Condition B)

Detailed Description

Participant characteristics

This study will recruit 10 participants according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

System development

In order to measure the quantitative change in hip joint angle online, an additional sensor will be placed on the pelvis segment (overlying the sacrum between the posterior superior iliac spines) and added to the current feedback system. Totally four sensors will be used, including the sensors on the pelvis, thigh, shank, and heel. The hip flexion angle will be calculated from pelvis and thigh sensors. The knee flexion angle will be calculated from thigh and shank sensors, while the heel sensor signal is monitored to isolate strides by detecting contact of the foot with the support surface. To help subjects easily recognize which joint the feedback is cueing for, different backgrounds is selected for the feedback interface for the hip joint and knee joint, respectively. Gait patterns will be video recorded in a sagittal view of the lower extremities. In order to test gait asymmetry by symmetry ratio (dividing the smaller value by the larger value between trained and untrained lower limbs), stance phase duration (% gait cycle) from heel strike to toe off will be identified by motion capturing system with reflective markers. Reflective markers will be placed on the ankles and shoes (fifth metatarsal, heel, rearfoot along the line from heel to toe and below the ankle) on both sides to measure the heel down and toe off events.

Biofeedback gait retraining protocol

Feedback training on the knee alone (Condition B) will include four 6-mins training blocks: 4-mins knee joint feedback-on and 2-mins feedback-off. Sequential switched feedback training on the knee and the hip (Condition A) will include four 6-mins training blocks: 2-mins knee joint feedback-on, 2-mins hip joint feedback-on, and 2-mins feedback-off. Subjects will wear their comfortable footwear and daily used bracing/orthotic devices during the training sessions. Totally four inertial sensors (MTw, Xsens, Netherlands) will be placed separately on the pelvis, anterior thigh, posterior shank and the heel of the paretic lower limb. For calibration purpose, the subject will first stand in his/her natural standing posture and then stand with the knee (weaker side) flexed at 60 degree adding to the knee angle in the natural standing posture. Prior to training, a treadmill walking trial with comfortable speed will be recorded as the baseline trial. After the baseline trial, a 3 minute practice trial will allow interactive demonstration and practice with the goal that the subject has a clear understanding of the task and how to interpret the feedback. In both the two training conditions, subjects will have 3 mins sitting rest between two consecutive blocks to reduce fatigue.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 10
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Xuan Liu, PhD; Phone Number: 973-324-3561; Email: XLiu@kesslerfoundation.org
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Peter Barrance, PhD; Phone Number: 973-324-3550; Email: pbarrance@kesslerfoundation.org

Study Locations

• United States
  • New Jersey
    • West Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07052
      • Recruiting
      • Kessler Foundation
      • Contact: Xuan Liu, PhD; Phone Number: 973-324-3561; Email: XLiu@kesslerfoundation.org
      • Contact: Peter Barrance, PhD; Phone Number: 973-324-3550; Email: pbarrance@kesslerfoundation.org

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 7 years to 21 years (Child, Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• age 7 to 21;
• has SKG
• diagnosed with brain injury including but not limited to Cerebral Palsy, Stroke,Traumatic Brain Injury;
• ability to walk on a treadmill without assistive devices based on parent/guardian report and/or treatment history;
• the cognitive development is at the level needed to: understand and follow instructions, answer questions, be able to understand the purpose of the study and the activities involved.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Botulinum toxin treatment less than 16 weeks before initiation of the study
• Recent or concurrent treatment that might interfere with the study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Other: feedback training on single joint first; Participants in Subgroup 1 will first undergo Condition B in the first visit and then Condition A in the second visit.	Other: Sequential switched feedback training on the knee and the hip (Condition A); Condition A will include four 6-mins training blocks: 2-mins knee joint feedback-on, 2-mins hip joint feedback-on, and 2-mins feedback-off. Training with feedback on will occur as follows: The subject will walk on the treadmill and try to achieve the target hip and/or knee flexion pattern shown on the feedback interface. Training with feedback off will occur as follows: The subject will walk on the treadmill and try to maintain the pattern without any form of visual or verbal feedback.; Other: Feedback training on the knee alone (Condition B); Condition B will include four 6-mins training blocks: 4-mins knee joint feedback-on and 2-mins feedback-off. Training with feedback on will occur as follows: The subject will walk on the treadmill and try to achieve the target hip and/or knee flexion pattern shown on the feedback interface. Training with feedback off will occur as follows: The subject will walk on the treadmill and try to maintain the pattern without any form of visual or verbal feedback.
Other: sequential feedback training on multi-joint first; Participants in Subgroup 2 will start with Condition A in the first visit and then undergo Condition B in the second visit.	Other: Sequential switched feedback training on the knee and the hip (Condition A); Condition A will include four 6-mins training blocks: 2-mins knee joint feedback-on, 2-mins hip joint feedback-on, and 2-mins feedback-off. Training with feedback on will occur as follows: The subject will walk on the treadmill and try to achieve the target hip and/or knee flexion pattern shown on the feedback interface. Training with feedback off will occur as follows: The subject will walk on the treadmill and try to maintain the pattern without any form of visual or verbal feedback.; Other: Feedback training on the knee alone (Condition B); Condition B will include four 6-mins training blocks: 4-mins knee joint feedback-on and 2-mins feedback-off. Training with feedback on will occur as follows: The subject will walk on the treadmill and try to achieve the target hip and/or knee flexion pattern shown on the feedback interface. Training with feedback off will occur as follows: The subject will walk on the treadmill and try to maintain the pattern without any form of visual or verbal feedback.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Root mean square error of the knee flexion angle	The root-mean-square error of the knee flexion angle (RMSE_KF) will be calculated between the measured and target knee flexion angles in the last ten strides of the last trial with feedback off in each training session.	immediate after the first training session
Root mean square error of the knee flexion angle	The root-mean-square error of the knee flexion angle (RMSE_KF) will be calculated between the measured and target knee flexion angles in the last ten strides of the last trial with feedback off in each training session.	immediate after the second training session
Peak knee flexion angle	The Peak knee flexion angle (PKF) is the mean maximum knee flexion angles in the last ten strides of the last trial with feedback off.	immediate after the first training session
Peak knee flexion angle	The Peak knee flexion angle (PKF) is the mean maximum knee flexion angles in the last ten strides of the last trial with feedback off.	immediate after the second training session
Peak hip flexion angle	The Peak hip flexion angle (PHF) is the mean maximum knee flexion angles in the last ten strides of the last trial with feedback off.	immediate after the first training session
Peak hip flexion angle	The Peak hip flexion angle (PHF) is the mean maximum knee flexion angles in the last ten strides of the last trial with feedback off.	immediate after the second training session
Minimum relative phase angle between hip and knee	Minimum relative phase angle between hip and knee is the minimum difference in phase angle between hip and knee. Phase angle is computed as the inverse tangent of angular velocity divided by angular displacement.	immediate after the first training session
Minimum relative phase angle between hip and knee	Minimum relative phase angle between hip and knee is the minimum difference in phase angle between hip and knee. Phase angle is computed as the inverse tangent of angular velocity divided by angular displacement.	immediate after the second training session
Symmetry ratio of the stance phase	The symmetry ratio is calculated by dividing the smaller value by the larger value (trained vs. untrained lower limbs) of the stance phase time (% gait cycle). This results in a value between 0.0 and 1.0, with values closer to 1.0 indicating greater symmetry.	immediate after the first training session
Symmetry ratio of the stance phase	The symmetry ratio is calculated by dividing the smaller value by the larger value (trained vs. untrained lower limbs) of the stance phase time (% gait cycle). This results in a value between 0.0 and 1.0, with values closer to 1.0 indicating greater symmetry.	immediate after the second training session

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Kessler Foundation
• Collaborators: Children's Specialized Hospital
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Xuan Liu, PhD, Kessler Foundation

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 30, 2021
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): June 30, 2022
• Study Completion (Anticipated): September 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 29, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 26, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): November 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 31, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 30, 2022
• Last Verified: March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: biofeedback; stiff knee gait
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Wounds and Injuries; Craniocerebral Trauma; Trauma, Nervous System; Brain Injuries
• Other Study ID Numbers: R-1084-19

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No