Refined Nursing in Rehabilitation Training

March 19, 2024 updated by: Xinxiang Central Hospital

Effect of Refined Nursing in Rehabilitation Training for Patients With Brain Injury During the Recovery Period: An Observational Study

This study is to explore the clinical effect of refined nursing in rehabilitation training for patients with brain injury during the recovery period. Patients in the control group were provided with routine nursing intervention, while patients in the study group adopted a nursing mode based on the concept of refinement treatment. Comparison was made in terms of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, cognitive function score, functional independence score, nursing satisfaction, and incidence of complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is to explore the clinical effect of refined nursing in rehabilitation training for patients with brain injury during the recovery period. The subjects of the study were 96 patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). According to the order of visits, there were 48 patients in the study group and the control group, respectively.Patients in the control group were provided with routine nursing intervention, while patients in the study group adopted a nursing mode based on the concept of refinement treatment. Comparison was made in terms of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, cognitive function score, functional independence score, nursing satisfaction, and incidence of complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Henan
      • Xinxiang, Henan, China, 453000
        • Effect of Refined Nursing in Rehabilitation Training for Patients with Brain Injury During the Recovery Period: An Observational Study

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients diagnosed with severe TBI through imaging examinations such as head CT and magnetic resonance imaging
  • patients with surgical indications
  • patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8 points
  • patients with complete clinical data
  • patients with written informed consent provided by family members

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with organic lesions of major organs such as liver and kidney
  • patients with contraindications for surgery
  • patients with primary diseases such as cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction
  • patients with combined or multiple injuries
  • patients with respiratory failure
  • patients whose family members had cognitive impairment or abnormal mental behaviors

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the intervention group
Establishment of a hierarchical monitoring and management team, Assessment of pressure injury, Communication, Intervention for pressure ulcer, Rehabilitation training
To be specific, the head nurse served as the team leader to conduct comprehensive macro supervision; moreover, there were 3 responsible team leaders and 6 responsible nurses, all of whom had rich clinical nursing experience and solid theoretical knowledge of pressure injury. Consequently, a joint-action mechanism of the head nurse - responsible team leader - responsible nurses was developed to facilitate the unification of the training of nursing content, precautions, etc.
Based on the postoperative coma of patients, the Braden assessment scale was applied to effectively evaluate patients from six dimensions of sensory perception, moisture, activity mode, mobility, nutrition, friction, and shear. The total score was 23 points. Patients scoring 13~14 points were evaluated by Braden once per week; and those scoring ≤12 points were evaluated at a frequency of 3d/ time.
Through intensive face-to-face communication with family members, timely information on the surgical effect, mechanism of pressure injury, preventive measures, and clinical manifestations through intuitive methods such as PPT and video, family members were taught with basic knowledge of pressure injury, and guided to inform medical staff in a timely manner when patients had symptoms of pressure ulcer. Simultaneously, by case sharing and positive suggestions, family members were supported to alleviate their concerns and improve their coordination with treatment
For patients with a Braden score of >14 points, attention should be paid to keeping skin dry and clean, regularly changing bed sheets and bedding (once per day). Patients with Braden score of 13-14 points should be provided with sponge mattresses, increased times of turning over once per 2 hours, and soft pillows or foam dressings at the site of occipital protuberance to relieve pressure and prevent pressure injury. For patients with Braden score ≤12 points, medical staff should repeatedly emphasize to their families the harm of pressure injury to postoperative recovery.
After regaining consciousness with stable vital signs, patients received rehabilitation training following the principle of association of activity and inertia in a regular order. Patients were guided to perform upper limb movements, joint flexion, lower limb flexion and extension, as well as daily training such as washing face, rinsing mouth, and dressing at a frequency of 3~4 times/d. Moreover, patients were advised to minimize violent behaviors such as laughing and talking loudly
Active Comparator: the control group
timely introduction of the current patient's condition to family members to alleviate their concerns, maintaining appropriate temperature (20 ℃~22 ℃) and humidity (60.0%~70.0%) in the ward, careful observation of vital signs such as heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and blood pressure in patients, rehabilitation training
After regaining consciousness with stable vital signs, patients received rehabilitation training following the principle of association of activity and inertia in a regular order. Patients were guided to perform upper limb movements, joint flexion, lower limb flexion and extension, as well as daily training such as washing face, rinsing mouth, and dressing at a frequency of 3~4 times/d. Moreover, patients were advised to minimize violent behaviors such as laughing and talking loudly
timely introduction of the current patient's condition to family members to alleviate their concerns
maintaining appropriate temperature (20 ℃~22 ℃) and humidity (60.0%~70.0%) in the ward
careful observation of vital signs such as heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and blood pressure in patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GCS scores
Time Frame: one day before the intervention
The highest GCS score was 15 points, indicating clear consciousness; while patients with 13-15, 9-12, and ≤8 points were classified as mild, moderate consciousness disorder, and coma, respectively. Patients with lower scores might indicate more serious consciousness disorder
one day before the intervention
GCS scores
Time Frame: 2 months after rehabilitation treatment
The highest GCS score was 15 points, indicating clear consciousness; while patients with 13-15, 9-12, and ≤8 points were classified as mild, moderate consciousness disorder, and coma, respectively. Patients with lower scores might indicate more serious consciousness disorder
2 months after rehabilitation treatment
cognitive function scores
Time Frame: one day before the intervention
Cognitive function was evaluated using the Chinese version of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (NCSE) to assess the cognitive function of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. This scale includes 10 items, i.e., spatial orientation (12 points), concentration (8 points), understandability (6 points), retelling (12 points), naming (8 points), spatial construction (6 points), memory (12 points), computing (4 points), similarity (8 points), and judgment (6 points)
one day before the intervention
cognitive function scores
Time Frame: 2 months after rehabilitation treatment
Cognitive function was evaluated using the Chinese version of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (NCSE) to assess the cognitive function of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. This scale includes 10 items, i.e., spatial orientation (12 points), concentration (8 points), understandability (6 points), retelling (12 points), naming (8 points), spatial construction (6 points), memory (12 points), computing (4 points), similarity (8 points), and judgment (6 points)
2 months after rehabilitation treatment
functional independence scores
Time Frame: one day before the intervention
Functional Independence Measure (FIM), utilizing a 7-point ordinal scale, was employed to assess the functional independence of two groups of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. FIM measures independent performance in self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication, social cognition, etc. The minimum score is 18 points, and the maximum score is 126 points (91 points for motor function and 35 points for cognitive function)
one day before the intervention
functional independence scores
Time Frame: 2 months after rehabilitation treatment
Functional Independence Measure (FIM), utilizing a 7-point ordinal scale, was employed to assess the functional independence of two groups of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. FIM measures independent performance in self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication, social cognition, etc. The minimum score is 18 points, and the maximum score is 126 points (91 points for motor function and 35 points for cognitive function)
2 months after rehabilitation treatment
Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS)
Time Frame: one day before the intervention
The Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS) was used to survey patient's nursing satisfaction. This scale measures patient's satisfaction with nursing care from 19 items, including nurse work ability, communication attitude, psychological counseling, nursing support, safety management, etc. It uses a 1-5 point scoring system, with a maximum possible score of 19-95 points. A score of ≥77, 58~76, 39~57 and ≤38 points indicated very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat satisfied, and dissatisfied, respectively. Satisfaction rate= (Cases of very satisfied + satisfied + somewhat satisfied)÷total cases
one day before the intervention
Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS)
Time Frame: 2 months after rehabilitation treatment
The Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS) was used to survey patient's nursing satisfaction. This scale measures patient's satisfaction with nursing care from 19 items, including nurse work ability, communication attitude, psychological counseling, nursing support, safety management, etc. It uses a 1-5 point scoring system, with a maximum possible score of 19-95 points. A score of ≥77, 58~76, 39~57 and ≤38 points indicated very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat satisfied, and dissatisfied, respectively. Satisfaction rate= (Cases of very satisfied + satisfied + somewhat satisfied)÷total cases
2 months after rehabilitation treatment
incidence of adverse reactions
Time Frame: one day before the intervention
Incidence (%)=Number of patients with complications/48×100%
one day before the intervention
incidence of adverse reactions
Time Frame: 2 months after rehabilitation treatment
Incidence (%)=Number of patients with complications/48×100%
2 months after rehabilitation treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jie Yang, Xinxiang Central Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries

Clinical Trials on Establishment of a hierarchical monitoring and management team

Subscribe