A Study to Test Whether Two Different Doses of Avenciguat Help People With Liver Cirrhosis and High Blood Pressure in the Portal Vein (Main Vessel Going to the Liver)

September 1, 2025 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled and Parallel Group Trial to Investigate the Effects of Two Doses (Up-titration to a Fixed Dose Regimen) of Oral BI 685509 on Portal Hypertension After 24 Weeks Treatment in Patients With Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension (CSPH) in Compensated Cirrhosis

This study is open to adults with liver cirrhosis and high blood pressure in the portal vein (main vessel going to the liver). The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called Avenciguat helps people with this condition.

Participants are put into 3 groups randomly, which means by chance. Participants in 2 groups take different doses of Avenciguat as tablets twice a day. Participants in the placebo group take placebo as tablets twice a day. Placebo tablets look like Avenciguat tablets but do not contain any medicine.

Participants are in the study for about 8 months. During this time, they visit the study site about 14 times. At 3 of the visits, the doctors check the pressure in a liver vein. This is done with a catheter (a long thin tube) and gives information about the pressure in the portal vein. The change in blood pressure is then compared between the groups to see whether the treatment works.

The doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • CABA, Argentina, C1199ABB
        • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
        • Medical University of Innsbruck
      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • AKH - Medical University of Vienna
      • Edegem, Belgium, 2650
        • Edegem - UNIV UZ Antwerpen
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 0A9
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)
      • Beijing, China, 100050
        • Beijing Friendship Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 100071
        • Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University
      • Guangzhou, China, 510515
        • NanFang Hosptial
      • Hangzhou, China, 310000
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University
      • Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
        • University Hospital Dubrava
      • Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650
        • Hvidovre Hospital
      • Angers, France, 49933
        • HOP d'Angers
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • HOP Rangueil
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Universitätsklinikum Münster
      • Wiesbaden, Germany, 65189
        • St. Josefs-Hospital, Wiesbaden
      • Nahariya, Israel, 2210001
        • Western Galilee Hospital
      • Milan, Italy, 20162
        • ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
      • Modena, Italy, 41124
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Di Modena
      • Palermo, Italy, 90127
        • Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone"
      • Roma, Italy, 00195
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS
      • Kanagawa, Kawasaki, Japan, 215-0026
        • Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital
      • Kanagawa, Sagamihara, Japan, 252-0375
        • Kitasato University Hospital
      • Kanagawa, Yokohama, Japan, 236-0004
        • Yokohama City University Hospital
      • Kanagawa, Yokohama, Japan, 245-8575
        • National Hospital Organization Yokohama Medical Center
      • Osaka, Osaka, Japan, 545-8586
        • Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital
      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
        • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)
      • Lisbon, Portugal, 1649-035
        • ULS de Santa Maria, E.P.E
      • Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 400000
        • Regional Institute of Gastroenterology Hepatology "Prof. Dr. O. Fodor"
      • Singapore, Singapore, 169608
        • Singapore General Hospital
      • Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea, 14584
        • Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Bucheon
      • Wonju-si, Gangwon State, South Korea, 26426
        • Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Ramón y Cajal
      • Majadahonda, Spain, 28222
        • Hospital Puerta de Hierro
      • Viganello, Switzerland, 6962
        • Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B15 2TH
        • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
      • London, United Kingdom, W2 1NY
        • St Mary's Hospital
    • California
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
        • California Liver Research Institute
      • Rialto, California, United States, 92377
        • Inland Empire Clinical Trials, LLC
    • Florida
      • Miami Lakes, Florida, United States, 33016
        • Floridian Clinical Research-Miami Lakes-68368
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • Northwell Health Center for Liver Disease
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78215
        • American Research Corporation at the Texas Liver Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with International Council on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and local legislation prior to admission to the trial
  2. Male or female who is ≥ 18 (or who is of legal age in countries where that is greater than 18) and ≤ 75 years old at screening
  3. Clinical signs of Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension (CSPH) as described by either one of the points below. Each trial patient must have a gastroscopy during the screening period or within 6 months prior to screening.

    • documented endoscopic proof of oesophageal varices and / or gastric varices at screening or within 6 months prior to screening
    • documented endoscopic-treated oesophageal varices as preventative treatment
  4. CSPH defined as baseline Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) ≥ 10 mmHg, based on a local interpretation of the pressure tracing
  5. Diagnosis of compensated alcohol-related cirrhosis. Diagnosis must be based on histology (historical data is acceptable) or on clinical evidence of cirrhosis (e.g. platelet count < 150 x 10^9/L [150 x 10^3/µL], nodular liver surface on imaging or splenomegaly)
  6. Abstinence from significant alcohol misuse / abuse for a minimum of 2 months prior to screening, and the ability to abstain from alcohol throughout the trial (both evaluated based on Investigator judgement)
  7. Willing and able to undergo HVPG measurements per protocol (based on Investigator judgement)
  8. If receiving statins must be on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to screening, with no planned dose change throughout the trial Further inclusion criteria apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous clinically significant decompensation events (e.g. ascites [more than perihepatic ascites], Variceal Haemorrhage (VH) and / or apparent Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE))
  2. History of other forms of chronic liver disease (e.g. non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), untreated Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), autoimmune liver disease, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, Wilson's disease, haemachromatosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1At) deficiency)
  3. Has received curative anti-viral therapy with direct-acting anti-virals within the last 2 years for HCV, or, if such treatment was > 2 years ago and there is no sustained virological response (SVR) at screening, or, must take curative anti-viral therapy with direct-acting anti-virals throughout the trial
  4. Alcohol-Related Liver Disease (ARLD) without adequate treatment (e.g. lifestyle modification) or with ongoing pathological drinking behaviour (misuse / abuse based on Investigator judgement)
  5. Must take, or wishes to continue the intake of, restricted concomitant therapy or any concomitant therapy considered likely (based on Investigator judgement) to interfere with the safe conduct of the trial
  6. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) < 100 mmHg and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) < 70 mmHg at screening
  7. Model of End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of > 15 at screening, calculated by the central laboratory
  8. Hepatic impairment defined as a Child-Turcotte-Pugh score ≥ B8 at screening, calculated by the site, using central laboratory results Further exclusion criteria apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Avenciguat 2 mg BID
Participants received Avenciguat combined with matching placebo tablets twice daily (BID). At Visit 2 (Week 1), each dose included one 1 mg Avenciguat tablet and one 2 mg placebo tablet (four tablets daily). At Visit 3 (Week 2), the dose was up titrated to 2 mg Avenciguat BID (one 1 mg placebo tablet and one 2 mg Avenciguat tablet (four tablets daily)). From Visit 4 onward (Week 3+), a pseudo up-titration was applied, with participants taking one 2 mg Avenciguat tablet and one 3 mg placebo tablet per dose (four tablets daily) to maintain blinding. This regimen continued for 24 weeks, with doses taken with water, with or without food.
Participants received Avenciguat twice daily (BID) throughout the study. Up-titration depended on the assigned dose group. At Visit 2 (Week 1), each dose included one 1 mg Avenciguat tablet. At Visit 3 (Week 2), the dose was increased to one 2 mg Avenciguat tablet per dose. From Visit 4 onward (Week 3+), participants received one 3 mg Avenciguat tablet per dose. This regimen continued for 24 weeks, with all doses taken with water, with or without food.
Experimental: Avenciguat 3 mg BID
Participants received Avenciguat with matching placebo tablets twice daily (BID). At Visit 2 (Week 1), each dose contained one 1 mg Avenciguat tablet and one 2 mg placebo tablet (four tablets daily). At Visit 3 (Week 2), the dose was up titrated to 2 mg Avenciguat BID (one 1 mg placebo tablet and one 2 mg active tablet (four tablets daily)). From Visit 4 onward (Week 3+), the dose was further up titrated to 3 mg Avenciguat BID (one 2 mg placebo tablet and one 3 mg active tablet per dose (four tablets daily)). This regimen was maintained for 24 weeks, with doses taken with water, with or without food.
Participants received Avenciguat twice daily (BID) throughout the study. Up-titration depended on the assigned dose group. At Visit 2 (Week 1), each dose included one 1 mg Avenciguat tablet. At Visit 3 (Week 2), the dose was increased to one 2 mg Avenciguat tablet per dose. From Visit 4 onward (Week 3+), participants received one 3 mg Avenciguat tablet per dose. This regimen continued for 24 weeks, with all doses taken with water, with or without food.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants in this dose group received matching placebo twice daily (BID) throughout the study period. At Visit 2 (Week 1), each dose consisted of one 1 mg placebo tablet and one 2 mg placebo tablet (four tablets daily). At Visit 3 (Week 2), a pseudo up-titration was implemented, maintaining the same tablets (one 1 mg and one 2 mg placebo per dose) for blinding. From Visit 4 onward (Week 3+), a second pseudo up-titration adjusted the dose to one 2 mg placebo tablet and one 3 mg placebo tablet per dose (four tablets daily). All doses were taken with water, with or without food.
Participants received matching placebo twice daily (BID) throughout the study. At Visit 2 (Week 1), each dose included one 1 mg and one 2 mg placebo tablet (four tablets daily). A pseudo up-titration was applied at Visit 3 (Week 2), maintaining the same tablet composition to preserve blinding. From Visit 4 (Week 3) onward, a second pseudo up-titration adjusted each dose to one 2 mg and one 3 mg placebo tablet (four tablets daily). All doses were taken with water, with or without food.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change in Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) From Baseline After 24 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.

HVPG was calculated as the difference between the average wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and either:

Proximal Free Hepatic Venous Pressure (PFHVP), if judged more reliable, or Average Free Hepatic Venous Pressure (FHVP), if considered more reliable.

Based on the central reader's judgment:

If PFHVP was more reliable:

HVPG(mmHg)= Average WHVP (mmHg) - PFHVP (mmHg)

If FHVP was more reliable:

HVPG(mmHg)=Average WHVP (mmHg)-Average FHVP (mmHg)

Percentage Change = (HVPG at 24 weeks- Baseline HVPG/Baseline HVPG) × 100

A restricted maximum likelihood (REML) approach using a mixed model with repeated measurements (MMRM) was used to estimate adjusted treatment means. The analysis included fixed categorical effects for treatment at each visit, use of non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) or carvedilol at baseline (yes/no), and fixed continuous effects for baseline hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) at each visit.

From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change in Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) From Baseline, Measured in Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg), After 8 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: From first administration of trial medication up to 8 weeks.

HVPG was calculated as the difference between the average wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and either:

Proximal Free Hepatic Venous Pressure (PFHVP), if judged more reliable. Average Free Hepatic Venous Pressure (FHVP), if considered more reliable.

Based on the central reader's judgment:

If PFHVP was more reliable:

HVPG(mmHg)= Average WHVP (mmHg) - PFHVP (mmHg)

If FHVP was more reliable:

HVPG(mmHg)=Average WHVP (mmHg)-Average FHVP (mmHg)

Percentage Change = (HVPG at 8 weeks- Baseline HVPG/Baseline HVPG) × 100

This endpoint was analyzed using the Treatment Policy Estimand and an ANCOVA model. The model included baseline HVPG as a linear covariate, and treatment and use of non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) or carvedilol as fixed effects.

From first administration of trial medication up to 8 weeks.
Response Defined as > 10% Reduction From Baseline HVPG (Measured in mmHg) After 8 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: From first administration of trial medication up to 8 weeks.
Response is defined as greater than 10% reduction from baseline HVPG (measured in mmHg) after 8 weeks of treatment. The number of participants with, or without response after 8 weeks of treatment with Avenciguat is reported.
From first administration of trial medication up to 8 weeks.
Response Defined as > 10% Reduction From Baseline HVPG (Measured in mmHg) After 24 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.
Response is defined as greater than 10% reduction from baseline HVPG (measured in mmHg) after 24 weeks of treatment.
From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.
Occurrence of One or More Decompensation Events (i.e. Ascites, VH, and / or Overt HE) During the 24 Week Treatment Period
Time Frame: From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.

A decompensation event is characterized by the occurrence of any of the following:

  • Ascites,
  • Variceal hemorrhage,
  • Overt hepatic encephalopathy.
From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.
Occurrence of CTCAE Grade 3 (or Higher) Hypotension or Syncope Based on Investigator Judgement, During the First 8 Weeks of the Treatment Period
Time Frame: From first administration of trial medication up to 8 weeks.
The occurrence of CTCAE grade 3 (or higher) hypotension or syncope, based on the investigator's judgment, during the first 8 weeks of the treatment period is reported.
From first administration of trial medication up to 8 weeks.
Occurrence of CTCAE Grade 3 (or Higher) Hypotension or Syncope Based on Investigator Judgement, During the 24 Week Treatment Period
Time Frame: From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.
The occurrence of CTCAE grade 3 (or higher) hypotension or syncope, based on the investigator's judgment, during the 24 weeks of the treatment period is reported.
From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.
Occurrence of Discontinuation Due to Hypotension or Syncope During the First 8 Weeks of the Treatment Period
Time Frame: From first administration of trial medication up to 8 weeks.
The occurrence of hypotension or syncope during the first 8 weeks of the treatment period leading to the participant's discontinuation is reported.
From first administration of trial medication up to 8 weeks.
Occurrence of Discontinuation Due to Hypotension or Syncope During the 24 Week Treatment Period
Time Frame: From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.
The occurrence of hypotension or syncope during the first 24 weeks of the treatment period leading to the participant's discontinuation is reported.
From first administration of trial medication up to 24 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1366-0021
  • 2021-001285-38 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Once the time frame criteria given under number 4 are fulfilled, researchers can use the following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to request access to the clinical study documents regarding this study, and upon a signed "Document Sharing Agreement".

Furthermore, researchers can request access to the clinical study data, for this and other listed studies, after the submission of a research proposal and according to the terms outlined in the website.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After structured results have been posted, all regulatory activities are completed in the US and EU for the product and indication, and after the primary manuscript has been accepted for publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

For study documents - upon signing of a 'Document Sharing Agreement'. For study data - 1. after the submission and approval of the research proposal (checks will be performed by the sponsor and/or the independent review panel, including checking that the planned analysis does not compete with sponsor's publication plan); 2. and upon signing of a legal agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe