- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05166681
Evaluation of Aesthetic Surgical Wound Closure by a Single Layer in Comparison With Traditional Multi-layer Closure
December 21, 2021 updated by: Ahmed Mohamed Abouzaid, Abouqir General Hospital
Evaluation of Surgical Wound Closure With Single Subcutaneous and Subdermal Sutures as a Single Layer in Comparison With Traditional Multiple Layer Closure in Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
the study is comparing the results of aesthetic surgery wound closure by a single layer versus the traditional multi-layer closure as regards the wound healing time, local wound complications, and the scar formed.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study puts in comparison the surgical wound closure of aesthetic procedures by single layer sutures technique, involving part of the subcutaneous tissue and the subdermal layer, with the multi-layer traditional closure, which involves subcutaneous layer closure by one or two raws of sutures and skin closure with any type of suturing techniques, then to evaluate the wound healing time, local wound complications, and the scar formed.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
200
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt, 21527
- Abouqir General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- all cases presented for different aesthetic surgery procedures e.g different breast contouring procedures, surgical trunk contouring procedures, Brachioplasty, and thigh lifting. No gender discrimination, age between 16-60 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- we excluded cases in age groups beyond that designed for the study, patients with co-morbid conditions that may affect the results of wound healing e.g Diabetics. Active smokers, trauma patients, or patients that will undergo primary or secondary reconstructive procedures.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: control group
cases allocated to that arm are those cases having their surgical wound closure by the traditional techniques involving subcutaneous layer closure as one or more raws of sutures and then skin layer closure
|
single layer surgical wound suturing in comparison with the traditional multi-layer wound suturing
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Single layer wound closure group
cases allocated to that group are those having their surgical wound closure with the new technique involving part of the subcutaneous layer and the subdermal layer
|
single layer surgical wound suturing in comparison with the traditional multi-layer wound suturing
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
single layer closure is as efficient and reliable as the multi-layer closure
Time Frame: 6 months follow up post-surgical
|
single layer surgical wound closure is a reliable and efficient method as the traditional multi-layer closure technique giving the same results and have the same complication rate as the traditional suturing techniques
|
6 months follow up post-surgical
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 5, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
December 5, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 9, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
December 22, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 11, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 21, 2021
Last Verified
December 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0304744
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
IPD Plan Description
data collected and results of the study will be evaluated and announced
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgical Wound Closure Technique
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterCompletedWound Closure TechniqueUnited States
-
Oslo University HospitalCompletedSkin Closure of Surgical Incisions by Tissue Glue vs SutureNorway
-
Columbia UniversityEthicon, Inc.CompletedEfficiency of Surgical Incision Closure | Post-operative ScarUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaCompleted
-
Suturion ABCross Research S.A.; Helsingborgs HospitalRecruitingWound Infection | Incisional Hernia | Laparotomy | Closure TechniqueSweden
-
Universidade Católica de MoçambiqueUniversity of Pittsburgh; Catholic University of MozambiqueCompletedSurgical TechniqueMozambique
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreNot yet recruitingPregnancy Related | Cesarean Section | Post-operative Pain | Fascial Closure | Surgical Technique
-
Government Medical College, PatialaCompletedInexpensive Closure of Fasciotomy Incisions Without the Need for Skin Grafting
-
Foundation for Southwest Orthopedic ResearchCompletedWound Closure | Total Knee Replacement ClosureUnited States
-
University of California, DavisCompletedWound Closure Techniques
Clinical Trials on surgical wound suturing
-
University of California, DavisCompletedWound Closure Techniques
-
Ryazan State Medical UniversityCompletedGangrenous Postoperative Ventral Hernia (Diagnosis) | Dehiscence of Laparotomy WoundRussian Federation
-
University of KentuckyCompletedSurgeryUnited States
-
Ain Shams UniversityUnknown
-
Fudan UniversityChanghai Hospital; Shanghai East Hospital; Shanghai Changzheng HospitalNot yet recruitingPain, Postoperative | Surgical Wound Infection | Gastrointestinal TumorsChina
-
University of MichiganCompleted
-
University of Novi SadCompletedSurgery | Postoperative Hemorrhage | Anticoagulants and Bleeding Disorders | Dentoalveolar HaemorrhageSerbia
-
Kuopio University HospitalUniversity of Eastern FinlandRecruitingCarpal Tunnel Syndrome | Median Nerve EntrapmentFinland
-
University of Sao PauloUnknownPain, Postoperative | Palate; Wound | CicatrizationBrazil
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterApollo Endosurgery, Inc.CompletedColon Malignant Tumor | Colon Benign TumorUnited States