- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06263205
Non-Dressing vs. Routine Dressing Change After Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery (Dressing)
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial Comparing No Wound Dressing Change Versus Routine Wound Dressing Change After Gastrointestinal Surgery
The goal of this randomized non-inferiority trial is to evaluate whether omitting postoperative wound dressings is noninferior to routine dressing changes in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is omitting dressings noninferior to routine dressing changes in preventing a composite of wound complications requiring clinical intervention?
- Can omitting dressings reduce postoperative pain and eliminate dressing-related costs?
Participants diagnosed with gastrointestinal tumors undergoing elective surgery will be randomly assigned to either the non-dressing group or the routine dressing group. The non-dressing group will have their initial dressing removed at 48 hours postoperatively, with no further coverage or disinfection unless clinically indicated. The dressing group will receive standardized dressing changes every 48 hours until suture removal at 7-14 days. Researchers will compare the two groups regarding the rate of wound complications, pain scores, and total dressing-related costs.
This study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for minimalist postoperative wound care, potentially improving patient comfort and reducing unnecessary medical expenses.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Research Objectives and Design:
This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. The primary objective is to demonstrate that omitting routine dressing changes is noninferior to standard care for preventing a composite of wound complications within 30 days after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Secondary objectives are to compare postoperative pain scores and total dressing-related costs between the two strategies.
Inclusion Criteria and Sample Size:
A total of 1138 patients aged 18 to 75 years who underwent elective gastrointestinal surgery for histologically confirmed malignancies were enrolled and randomized. Key inclusion criteria included an ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1. Key exclusion criteria included active skin disorders at the incision site, uncontrolled comorbidities, prior abdominal radiotherapy, recent immunosuppressive therapy, or inability to complete follow-up, as detailed in the protocol.
Study Methodology:
Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the non-dressing group or the routine dressing group. In the non-dressing group, the initial dressing was removed 48 hours postoperatively, with no further disinfection, cleansing, or wound coverage unless specific clinical indications arose (e.g., purulent discharge, extensive erythema). In the routine dressing group, patients received standardized dressing changes every 48 hours, consisting of disinfection with 10% povidone-iodine and application of a new sterile dressing, until suture removal at 7-14 days postoperatively. All wound complications were adjudicated by an independent, blinded Endpoint Committee using standardized photographic evidence.
Follow-up and Outcomes:
Follow-up assessments were conducted every other day before discharge and at postoperative days 14 and 30. The primary outcome was the composite incidence of postoperative wound complications requiring clinical intervention within 30 days after surgery (incisional SSI, fat liquefaction, hematoma, wound dehiscence, or delayed healing). Secondary outcomes included individual complication rates, pain scores measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) on postoperative days 2, 4, and 6, and total dressing-related costs.
Statistical Analysis:
The primary analysis was performed on the intention-to-treat population. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the risk difference (non-dressing minus dressing) was below the prespecified margin of +6%. The non-inferiority hypothesis was tested with a one-sided alpha of 0.025.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Shanghai Municipality
-
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200433
- Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University
-
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 2000000
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
-
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200003
- Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University
-
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200120
- Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged between 18 and 75 years.
- Having undergone elective gastrointestinal surgery for gastrointestinal cancer (histologically confirmed) within the past 24 hours.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1.
- Possessing sufficient cognitive ability to understand the study protocol and voluntarily signing a written informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of significant barriers to completing postoperative follow-up (e.g., severe sensory/cognitive impairment, inability to adhere to follow-up plan, lack of reliable contact methods, residence >6 hours from study center).
- Concurrent active skin diseases that may affect wound healing (e.g., psoriasis, chronic eczema, atopic dermatitis) located at or near the surgical incision site.
- History of major abdominal trauma or prior abdominal surgery resulting in abdominal wall deformity or extensive scarring that may affect incision healing or assessment.
- Current diagnosis of any other uncontrolled severe comorbid conditions (e.g., uncontrolled other malignant tumors, acute or persistent chronic infections) that may pose additional risks or confound study outcomes.
- Planned or ongoing receipt of any other anticancer treatments (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, biological therapy, radiotherapy) or long-term immunosuppressive therapy during the perioperative period.
- Current long-term or high-dose use of systemic corticosteroids or any other medications that may significantly affect wound healing (topical/inhaled/low-dose steroids allowed if assessed by investigator).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Non-Dressing Group
Participants in this group received standard wound disinfection and initial sterile dressing immediately after surgery.
At 48 hours postoperatively, the initial dressing was removed.
No further disinfection, cleansing, or wound coverage was performed unless specific clinical indications arose.
The incision remained exposed until suture removal at 7-14 days postoperatively.
This arm evaluates whether omitting routine dressing changes is noninferior to standard care in preventing wound complications.
|
Participants received standard wound disinfection and initial sterile dressing immediately after surgery.
At 48 hours postoperatively, the initial dressing was removed.
Unless specific clinical indications arose (e.g., purulent discharge, extensive erythema), no further disinfection or wound coverage was performed.
The incision remained exposed until suture removal at 7-14 days postoperatively.
This intervention evaluates the noninferiority of omitting routine dressing changes in terms of wound complications, pain reduction, and cost savings.
|
|
Active Comparator: Dressing Group
Participants in this group received standard postoperative care.
Their surgical wounds were covered with dressings immediately after surgery, and these dressings were changed every 48 hours (including disinfection and reapplication of dressing) until suture removal at 7-14 days postoperatively.
This group serves as the comparator for assessing the non-dressing approach.
|
This intervention involves standard postoperative wound care.
After surgery, wounds were disinfected and covered with dressings.
Dressings were changed every 48 hours (with disinfection and reapplication) until suture removal (7-14 days postoperatively), following traditional wound management practices.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of composite wound complications within 30 days after surgery
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
|
This is a composite endpoint including surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, hematoma/seroma requiring intervention, fat liquefaction, and delayed wound healing, each of which necessitated additional medical intervention. The non-inferiority of the "no dressing change" strategy versus the "routine dressing change" strategy will be tested using the Farrington-Manning test. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin (Δ) is 6%. Non-inferiority will be established if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference in incidence rates (no dressing change minus routine dressing change) is below 6%. Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery. |
Within 30 days after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain Score
Time Frame: Postoperative days 2, 4, and 6
|
Pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 0-10 scale with higher scores indicating greater pain.
Assessments are performed at rest by trained research staff.
|
Postoperative days 2, 4, and 6
|
|
Total Dressing-Related Costs
Time Frame: From the time of surgery up to 30 days post-surgery
|
Direct costs calculated from the hospital perspective using standardized fee schedules.
Total cost per patient includes three components: (1) material costs (primary sterile dressing), (2) nursing procedure fees for each dressing change (classified as minor, intermediate, or major according to the National Catalog of Medical Service Prices), and (3) any additional treatment costs incurred due to management of wound complications.
|
From the time of surgery up to 30 days post-surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dazhi Xu, MD, PhD, Fudan University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Nichols RL. Preventing surgical site infections: a surgeon's perspective. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):220-4. doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010214.
- Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Song KY, Ryu SY. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):627-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
- Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Lee YJ, Park JM, Kim JJ, Kwon OK, Kong SH, Kim HI, Lee HJ, Kim W, Ryu SW, Jin SH, Oh SJ, Ryu KW, Kim MC, Ahn HS, Park YK, Kim YH, Hwang SH, Kim JW, Cho GS. A feasibility study of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a prospective multi-center phase II clinical trial, KLASS 03. Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jan;22(1):214-222. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0864-4. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
- Ushiku H, Hosoda K, Yamashita K, Katada N, Kikuchi S, Tsuruta H, Watanabe M. A Risk Model for Surgical Site Infection in the Gastric Cancer Surgery Using Data of 790 Patients. Dig Surg. 2015;32(6):472-9. doi: 10.1159/000440703. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
- Inokuchi M, Sugita H, Otsuki S, Sato Y, Nakagawa M, Kojima K. Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy reduced surgical site infection as compared with open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a meta-analysis of both randomized controlled and case-controlled studies. Int J Surg. 2015 Mar;15:61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.030. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
- Chetter IC, Oswald AV, Fletcher M, Dumville JC, Cullum NA. A survey of patients with surgical wounds healing by secondary intention; an assessment of prevalence, aetiology, duration and management. J Tissue Viability. 2017 May;26(2):103-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
- Giaquinto-Cilliers MGC, Nair A, Von Pressentin KB, Coetzee F, Saeed H. A 'game of dressings': Strategies for wound management in primary health care. S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2022 Feb 28;64(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/safp.v64i1.5462.
- Upton D, Solowiej K. The impact of atraumatic vs conventional dressings on pain and stress. J Wound Care. 2012 May;21(5):209-15. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2012.21.5.209.
- Heal C, Buettner P, Raasch B, Browning S, Graham D, Bidgood R, Campbell M, Cruikshank R. Can sutures get wet? Prospective randomised controlled trial of wound management in general practice. BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1053-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38800.628704.AE. Epub 2006 Apr 24.
- Dumville JC, Gray TA, Walter CJ, Sharp CA, Page T, Macefield R, Blencowe N, Milne TK, Reeves BC, Blazeby J. Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 20;12(12):CD003091. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003091.pub4.
- Law NW, Ellis H. Exposure of the wound--a safe economy in the NHS. Postgrad Med J. 1987 Jan;63(735):27-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.63.735.27. No abstract available.
- Furka A, Simko C, Kostyal L, Szabo I, Valikovics A, Fekete G, Tornyi I, Oross E, Revesz J. Treatment Algorithm for Cancerous Wounds: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 25;14(5):1203. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051203.
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Postoperative Complications
- Pathologic Processes
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Infections
- Digestive System Diseases
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Wound Infection
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Pain, Postoperative
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Surgical Wound Infection
- Digestive System Neoplasms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Dressing
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain Management | Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedics
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompleted
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedAcute Postoperative Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainTurkey
-
Children's National Research InstituteVentureWellRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Acute Pain | Acute Pain, PostoperativeUnited States
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain ManagementMalaysia
-
Maimonides Medical CenterCompletedPOSTOPERATIVE PAINUnited States
-
University Hospital, AntwerpUnknown
Clinical Trials on Non-Dressing of Surgical Wound
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedPain, Postoperative | Palate; Wound | CicatrizationBrazil
-
Birken AGCompletedWoundsGermany, Austria, Bulgaria, Czechia, Finland, Poland
-
Birken AGCompletedWoundsSpain, France, Greece, Latvia
-
Calvary Hospital, Bronx, NYSuspended
-
Region SkaneRecruitingPostoperative Complications | Surgical Wound Infection | Skin Cancer | Wound Healing | Bandages | Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy | Skin Grafting | Lower Extremity | Skin Transplantation | Split Thickness Skin Graft | Skin Tumour | LegSweden
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedPain From Free Gingival GraftUnited States
-
UPM BiomedicalsUniversity of HelsinkiCompleted
-
Hopital de l'Enfant-JesusCompleted
-
University of British ColumbiaUnknownSurgical Site Infection | Hematoma | Seroma | Wound Complication | Wound Dehiscence
-
Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong KongUnknownSurgical Site InfectionHong Kong