- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05175599
Hospital Waterbirth Trial to Measure Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
Hospital Waterbirth: A Pilot Randomized Control Study
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53233
- Aurora Sinai Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Prenatal low-risk, healthy, adult women (greater than or equal to 18 years of age), including:
- Able to speak and understand English
- Women with a singleton gestation
- Able to ambulate with no mobility restrictions (i.e., no difficulty getting from seated to standing)
- Less than class III obesity (BMI <40kg/m squared) at initiation of prenatal care
- No active infections such as HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, herpes simplex virus outbreak (on prophylaxis acceptable), group B strep positive is acceptable
- No pre-existing medical conditions such as: heart disease, uncontrolled asthma, diabetes of any type, chronic hypertension, or other condition that requires continuous observation and/or activity restrictions
No high-risk pregnancy conditions: including preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, preterm gestation, multiple gestation, substance abuse, placental abruption or other unexplained vaginal bleeding, previous cesarean section, suspected fetal macrosomia (>4500gm) or intrauterine growth restrictions (<10th percentile), or other condition that requires continuous observation and/or activity restrictions
Labor inclusion criteria:
- Greater than 37 weeks and less than 42 completed weeks gestation in vertex presentation
- Not hypertensive or febrile (two blood pressures 140/90 four hours apart; two fevers of over 100.4 one hour apart)
- Category 1 fetal heart tones (obtained on a 20-minute admission external fetal monitor strip)
- Amniotic sac may be intact or ruptured. If ruptured, amniotic fluid must be clear.
Exclusion Criteria:
Women will be excluded from the study if they do not meet above inclusion criteria or they will be further excluded under the following circumstances:
- Known need for cesarean section
- Participant may be excluded from the study at any time at the discretion of the birth attendant (reason for study exclusion will be documented but will remain in the study group previously selected based on intention to treat).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Land Birth
Women in the land birth group will labor and give birth according to standard of care procedures.
|
|
|
Experimental: Water Birth
Women in the water birth group will give birth in the water.
During the first stage of labor, women may enter or leave the water at any point.
|
The water birth group will use a tub of a water to labor and give birth.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Women Using Intravenous Narcotic Analgesia and Epidural Anesthesia
Time Frame: Time of admission to birth of the baby
|
The number of women in the waterbirth cohort who use IV narcotic and epidural anesthesia compared with the land birth cohort.
|
Time of admission to birth of the baby
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Median Time of Labor Duration
Time Frame: Time of labor onset to time of birth
|
The median time of labor duration (1st stage onset of strong regular contractions resulting in cervical change, 2nd stage pushing and birth of the neonate, 3rd stage delivery of the placenta) of women in the waterbirth cohort will be compared to the land birth cohort.
|
Time of labor onset to time of birth
|
|
United States Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (US-BSS-R) Score
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours post delivery
|
The US-BSS-R is a 10 question scale using a 5 point Likert scale with answers ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree".
The overall US-BSS-R total birth satisfaction score ranging from 0-40 (least birth satisfaction - most birth satisfaction).
Women in the waterbirth cohort will be compared to those in the land birth cohort for overall US-BSS-R score.
|
Up to 72 hours post delivery
|
|
Number of Reported Maternal Adverse Outcomes
Time Frame: During labor and birth through the immediate postpartum hospital admission (24-48 hours after the birth)
|
The number of women in the waterbirth cohort with reported adverse maternal obstetric outcomes will be compared to the land birth cohort.
|
During labor and birth through the immediate postpartum hospital admission (24-48 hours after the birth)
|
|
Number of Patients Breastfeeding
Time Frame: Measured from birth (immediate) through discharge from hospital (24-48 hours)
|
The number of women in the waterbirth cohort who initiate immediately after the birth breastfeeding will be compared to those in the land birth cohort.
|
Measured from birth (immediate) through discharge from hospital (24-48 hours)
|
|
Number of Neonatal Adverse Outcomes
Time Frame: Immediately after the birth until the time of the postpartum visit (usually 4 to 6 weeks of life)
|
The number of patients with neonates in the waterbirth cohort with reported adverse birth outcomes will be compared to patients with neonates in the land birth cohort.
|
Immediately after the birth until the time of the postpartum visit (usually 4 to 6 weeks of life)
|
|
Number of Patients With Neonates With Instrumental and Cesarean Deliveries
Time Frame: Time of labor to time of delivery
|
The number of patients with neonates in the waterbirth cohort with instrumental and cesarean deliveries will be compared to patients with neonates in the land birth cohort.
|
Time of labor to time of delivery
|
|
Number of Patients With Skin-to-skin Contact
Time Frame: Measured from time of birth (hour/minute) to time of skin-to-skin contact initiation (in number of minutes) up to 60 minutes of life.
|
The number of patients with neonates in the waterbirth cohort with skin-to-skin contact will be compared with patients with neonates in the land birth cohort.
|
Measured from time of birth (hour/minute) to time of skin-to-skin contact initiation (in number of minutes) up to 60 minutes of life.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Emily Malloy, CNM, APNP, emily.malloy@aah.org
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e164-e173. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003074.
- Nutter E, Meyer S, Shaw-Battista J, Marowitz A. Waterbirth: an integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 May-Jun;59(3):286-319. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12194.
- Duffin C. Waterbirth findings reveal high levels of satisfaction: Royal College of Midwives annual conference reflects a further move away from medical interventions towards. Nursing Standard. 2004 May 26;18(37):8-9.
- Cluett ER, Burns E. Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub3.
- Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4.
- Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003934.pub2.
- Shaw-Battista J. Systematic Review of Hydrotherapy Research: Does a Warm Bath in Labor Promote Normal Physiologic Childbirth? J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Oct/Dec;31(4):303-316. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000260.
- ACNM. Position statement: Hydrotherapy during labor and birth. 2014.
- Committee Opinion No. 679: Immersion in Water During Labor and Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):e231-e236. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001771.
- Maude RM, Foureur MJ. It's beyond water: stories of women's experience of using water for labour and birth. Women Birth. 2007 Mar;20(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Dec 14.
- Dahlen HG, Dowling H, Tracy M, Schmied V, Tracy S. Maternal and perinatal outcomes amongst low risk women giving birth in water compared to six birth positions on land. A descriptive cross sectional study in a birth centre over 12 years. Midwifery. 2013 Jul;29(7):759-64. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
- Pagano E, De Rota B, Ferrando A, Petrinco M, Merletti F, Gregori D. An economic evaluation of water birth: the cost-effectiveness of mother well-being. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Oct;16(5):916-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01220.x.
- Odent M. Birth under water. Lancet. 1983 Dec 24-31;2(8365-66):1476-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90816-4. No abstract available.
- Henderson J, Burns EE, Regalia AL, Casarico G, Boulton MG, Smith LA. Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obstetric units in Italy: prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 14;14:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-17.
- Chaichian S, Akhlaghi A, Rousta F, Safavi M. Experience of water birth delivery in Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2009 Sep;12(5):468-71.
- Gayiti MR, Li XY, Zulifeiya AK, Huan Y, Zhao TN. Comparison of the effects of water and traditional delivery on birthing women and newborns. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(9):1554-8.
- Woodward J, Kelly SM. A pilot study for a randomised controlled trial of waterbirth versus land birth. BJOG. 2004 Jun;111(6):537-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00132.x.
- Torkamani SA, Kangani F, Janani F. The effects of delivery in water on duration of delivery and pain compared with normal delivery. Pak J Med Sci. 2010; 26(3):551-5.
- Ghasemi, M, Tara, F., Ashraf, H. Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Complications of Water-Birth Compared with Conventional Delivery. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2013; 16(70):9-15.
- Nikodem VC. The effects of water birth: a randomised controlled trail. Thesis: Rand Afrikaans University, South Africa
- Alderdice F, Renfrew M, Marchant S, Ashurst H, Hughes P, Berridge G, Garcia J. Labour and birth in water in England and Wales. BMJ. 1995 Apr 1;310(6983):837. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6983.837. No abstract available.
- Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, Everson C. Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Following Waterbirth: The Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009 Cohort. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Jan-Feb;61(1):11-20. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12394. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
- Burns EE, Boulton MG, Cluett E, Cornelius VR, Smith LA. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study. Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):192-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00548.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
- Demirel G, Moraloglu O, Celik IH, Erdeve O, Mollamahmutoglu L, Oguz SS, Uras N, Dilmen U. The effects of water birth on neonatal outcomes: a five-year result of a referral tertiary centre. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 May;17(10):1395-8.
- Geissbühler V, Eberhard, J. Waterbirths: A Comparative Study-A Prospective Study on More than 2,000 Waterbirths. Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 2001. 56(5): 260-262.
- Zanetti-Dallenbach R, Lapaire O, Maertens A, Holzgreve W, Hosli I. Water birth, more than a trendy alternative: a prospective, observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006 Oct;274(6):355-65. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0208-1. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
- Taylor H, Kleine I, Bewley S, Loucaides E, Sutcliffe A. Neonatal outcomes of waterbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jul;101(4):F357-65. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309600. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
- Vanderlaan J, Hall PJ, Lewitt M. Neonatal outcomes with water birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery. 2018 Apr;59:27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.023. Epub 2017 Dec 26. No abstract available.
- Gilbert RE, Tookey PA. Perinatal mortality and morbidity among babies delivered in water: surveillance study and postal survey. BMJ. 1999 Aug 21;319(7208):483-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7208.483.
- Davies R, Davis D, Pearce M, Wong N. The effect of waterbirth on neonatal mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):180-231. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2105.
- Dekker R, The Evidence on: Waterbirth, in Evidence Based Birth. 2018. https://evidencebasedbirth.com/waterbirth/
- Bodner K, Bodner-Adler B, Wierrani F, Mayerhofer K, Fousek C, Niedermayr A, Grunberger W. Effects of water birth on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 Jun 14;114(10-11):391-5.
- Fehervary P, Lauinger-Lorsch E, Hof H, Melchert F, Bauer L, Zieger W. Water birth: microbiological colonisation of the newborn, neonatal and maternal infection rate in comparison to conventional bed deliveries. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004 Jul;270(1):6-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-002-0467-4. Epub 2003 Sep 3.
- Fleming SE, Donovan-Batson C, Burduli E, Barbosa-Leiker C, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Birth Satisfaction Scale/Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS/BSS-R): A large scale United States planned home birth and birth centre survey. Midwifery. 2016 Oct;41:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
- A Model Practice Template for Hydrotherapy in Labor and Birth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):120-126. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12587. Epub 2016 Nov 24. No abstract available.
- Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014 Jun;30(6):610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
- Fetal Heart Monitoring. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;44(5):683-6. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12743. Epub 2015 Jul 15. No abstract available.
- Karimi, Laleh. Personal correspondence. (August 2019).
- Barbosa-Leiker C, Fleming S, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) for US mothers. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2015; 33(5):504-11.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00106915
- 20.176 (Other Identifier: Advocate Aurora Health Care)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pregnancy Related
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...The University of Texas at San AntonioCompleted
-
Gynuity Health ProjectsCuidado Integral de la Mujer, Gineclinic, S.C.; Servicios de Salud Medieg,...Not yet recruitingPregnancy Related | Pregnancy Early
-
4YouandMeCambridge Cognition Ltd; Sema4; Evidation Health; Vector Institute of Artificial... and other collaboratorsCompletedPregnancy Related | Wearables | Pregnancy EarlyUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedPregnancy Related | Pregnancy, High RiskUnited States
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalPeking Union Medical CollegeUnknownPregnancy | Pregnancy Related | Infant | Pregnancy Disease | Risk FactorChina
-
Shaare Zedek Medical CenterUnknownPregnancy Related | Pregnancy, High Risk | Anesthesia
-
Portucalense UniversityAveiro University; Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Ave, EPERecruiting
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityNot yet recruitingPregnancy Related
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityRecruiting
-
Biorithm Pte LtdNot yet recruitingPregnancy Related
Clinical Trials on Water Birth
-
Amasya UniversityAtaturk UniversityCompletedSatisfaction, Patient | Pain, LaborTurkey
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityTokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterTerminated
-
Selcuk UniversityCompletedPain | Labor Pain | SatisfactionTurkey
-
St. Justine's HospitalMcGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID); Bill and Melinda... and other collaboratorsUnknownSepsis | Infant, Newborn, Diseases | Puerperal InfectionSouth Africa
-
Albany Medical CollegeUnknownPTSD | Anxiety | Pregnancy, High Risk | PreTerm Birth | Parturition Complication as Antepartum ConditionUnited States
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompleted
-
St. Justine's HospitalCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Centre hospitalier de l'Université... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingPrematurity; ExtremeCanada