- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05190393
Comparison of Techniques Between Concave Distraction and Convex Resection in the Treatment of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis
December 28, 2021 updated by: Peking University Third Hospital
To treat congenital cervical scoliosis, previous literature introduced surgical technique, like hemivertebra resection by anterior and posterior approach.
Although this technique is effective, it has a lot of disadvantages.
So investigators introduce another surgical technique.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Although hemivertebra resection technique can obtain satisfactory clinical outcome, it has its disadvantages.
Because of the presence of vertebral arteries, the procedure of cervical hemivertebra resection is not only difficult and risky, but also time and labor consuming.
The operation is a great challenge to the skill, physical strength and energy of the surgical team.
Meanwhile, hemivertebra resection and compression on convex side may lead to iatrogenic foraminal stenosis and increase the incidence of nerve root palsy at the corresponding segment after surgery.
The shortening of the convex side may further aggravate the patient's existing short neck deformity, which is not conducive to the recovery of patient's appearance.
Therefore, our department pioneer a new surgical technique to avoid hemivertebra resection in 2015, which is distraction and lateral opening on concave side.
This technique extends the concave side through intervertebral space where the concave apex locates or adjacent intervertebral space to achieve the purpose of scoliosis correction.
The avoidance of hemivertebra resection significantly reduces the difficulty and risk of the surgery.
This procedure tries to make up for the patient's congenital anatomical deficiency and lengthen the concave side.
Although there is no need to expose vertebral artery, preoperative CTA(computed tomography angiography) should be performed routinely to determine whether there is abnormality in vertebral artery and whether it will interfere with the distraction on concave side and the placement of prosthesis.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
- Peking University Third Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients with congenital cervical scoliosis were enrolled.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- the presence of torticollis caused by congenital cervical scoliosis (defined as a Cobb angle of >10°)
- operation and follow-up were performed in our hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with other causes of torticollis appearance, such as muscular torticollis, ocular torticollis, neurogenic torticollis, etc.
- Patients with other spinal deformity or disease, such as cervical kyphosis or kyphoscoliosis, congenital deformity of middle and lower thoracic vertebra, lumbar vertebra, ankylosing spondylitis, severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament, etc.
- Cervical infectious diseases, cervical primary or metastatic tumor
- Have a history of spinal trauma or surgery
- Imaging data are incomplete or of poor quality.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Convex resection group
Patients were used hemivertebra resection procedure on convex side to treat congenital cervical scoliosis.
|
Patients were used hemivertebra resection procedure to treat congenital cervical scoliosis.
|
Concave distraction group
Patients were used distraction and lateral opening procedure on concave side to treat congenital cervical scoliosis, without hemivertebra resection.
|
Patients were used distraction and lateral opening procedure to treat congenital cervical scoliosis.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
the structural Cobb angle
Time Frame: one week pre operation
|
the large curve in the segments with vertebral deformities causing clinical asymmetry or head deviation and needs to be surgically corrected
|
one week pre operation
|
the structural Cobb angle
Time Frame: one week after surgery
|
the large curve in the segments with vertebral deformities causing clinical asymmetry or head deviation and needs to be surgically corrected
|
one week after surgery
|
the structural Cobb angle
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
the large curve in the segments with vertebral deformities causing clinical asymmetry or head deviation and needs to be surgically corrected
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
distal compensatory Cobb angle
Time Frame: one week pre operation
|
the small curve without vertebral deformities
|
one week pre operation
|
distal compensatory Cobb angle
Time Frame: one week after surgery
|
the small curve without vertebral deformities
|
one week after surgery
|
distal compensatory Cobb angle
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
the small curve without vertebral deformities
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
mandibular incline
Time Frame: one week pre operation
|
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the mandibular angles on both sides
|
one week pre operation
|
mandibular incline
Time Frame: one week after surgery
|
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the mandibular angles on both sides
|
one week after surgery
|
mandibular incline
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the mandibular angles on both sides
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
clavicle angle
Time Frame: one week pre operation
|
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the clavicular distal end on both sides
|
one week pre operation
|
clavicle angle
Time Frame: one week after surgery
|
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the clavicular distal end on both sides
|
one week after surgery
|
clavicle angle
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the clavicular distal end on both sides
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
blood loss
Time Frame: during operation
|
blood loss during operation
|
during operation
|
surgical time duration
Time Frame: during operation
|
surgical time duration during operation
|
during operation
|
complications
Time Frame: peroperative period
|
complications during and after operation
|
peroperative period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Yu Sun, MD, Peking University Third Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 28, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
January 13, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 13, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 28, 2021
Last Verified
January 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PUTHCCS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Congenital Scoliosis Due to Bony Malformation
-
Oslo University HospitalEnrolling by invitationScoliosis | Scoliosis; Juvenile | Scoliosis; Idiopathic, Infantile | Scoliosis Neuromuscular | Scoliosis in Neurofibromatosis | Scoliosis; Congenital, Postural | Scoliosis in Skeletal Dysplasia | Scoliosis Associated With Other Conditions | Scoliosis; Congenital, Due to Bony MalformationNorway
-
Balgrist University HospitalCompletedScoliosis | Underdevelopment; Congenital Malformation, Lower LimbSwitzerland
-
Guangzhou Blood CenterGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Sun Yat-sen... and other collaboratorsCompletedBlood Transfusion | Blood Group Antigen Abnormality | Rhesus Isoimmunisation Due to Anti-DChina
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineWest China Hospital; Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command; Second Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University and other collaboratorsUnknownSkin; Deformity, Due to ScarChina
-
University College, LondonWashington University School of Medicine; University of Washington; Alzheimer... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingAlzheimer Disease | Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer Disease Due to Mutation of Presenilin 1 (Disorder) | Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer Disease Due to Mutation of Presenilin 2 (Disorder) | Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer Disease Due to Mutation of Amyloid Precursor Protein (Disorder)
-
Hope Biosciences Stem Cell Research FoundationHope BiosciencesNo longer availableCongenital Muscular Dystrophy Due to Lamin A/C MutationUnited States
-
Changi General HospitalCompletedPrimary Aldosteronism | Primary Aldosteronism Due to Aldosterone Producing Adenoma | Primary Aldosteronism Due to Adrenal Hyperplasia (Bilateral)Singapore
-
University of Turin, ItalyCompletedPrimary Aldosteronism | Primary Aldosteronism Due to Aldosterone Producing Adenoma | Primary Aldosteronism Due to Adrenal Hyperplasia (Bilateral)Italy
-
Lebanese UniversityCompletedPolycystic Ovary Syndrome | Endometriosis | Ectopic Pregnancy | Premature Ovarian Failure | Female Infertility Endocrine | Female Infertility | Fibroids | Salpingitis | Hydrosalpinx | Female Infertility Due to Ovulatory Disorder | Female Infertility of Tubal Origin | Female Infertility Due to Tubal Block | Female... and other conditionsLebanon
-
Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital AuthorityCompletedAnemia, Sickle Cell | Sickling Disorder Due to Hemoglobin SUnited States
Clinical Trials on hemivertebra resection on convex side
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityNot yet recruitingCongenital Hemivertebra
-
Jordan University of Science and TechnologyCompletedOrthodontic ApplianceJordan
-
Nordic Life Science Pipeline Inc.Completed
-
Zagazig UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital, LimogesCompleted
-
University of Auckland, New ZealandCompletedVaccinationNew Zealand
-
dong zhangNot yet recruitingAnalgesia | Quadratus Lumborum Block | Colorectal | Laparoscopic
-
University of ArizonaCompleted
-
Shalvata Mental Health CenterUnknown
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUnknownLamellar IchthyosisFrance