Comparison of Techniques Between Concave Distraction and Convex Resection in the Treatment of Congenital Cervical Scoliosis

December 28, 2021 updated by: Peking University Third Hospital
To treat congenital cervical scoliosis, previous literature introduced surgical technique, like hemivertebra resection by anterior and posterior approach. Although this technique is effective, it has a lot of disadvantages. So investigators introduce another surgical technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although hemivertebra resection technique can obtain satisfactory clinical outcome, it has its disadvantages. Because of the presence of vertebral arteries, the procedure of cervical hemivertebra resection is not only difficult and risky, but also time and labor consuming. The operation is a great challenge to the skill, physical strength and energy of the surgical team. Meanwhile, hemivertebra resection and compression on convex side may lead to iatrogenic foraminal stenosis and increase the incidence of nerve root palsy at the corresponding segment after surgery. The shortening of the convex side may further aggravate the patient's existing short neck deformity, which is not conducive to the recovery of patient's appearance. Therefore, our department pioneer a new surgical technique to avoid hemivertebra resection in 2015, which is distraction and lateral opening on concave side. This technique extends the concave side through intervertebral space where the concave apex locates or adjacent intervertebral space to achieve the purpose of scoliosis correction. The avoidance of hemivertebra resection significantly reduces the difficulty and risk of the surgery. This procedure tries to make up for the patient's congenital anatomical deficiency and lengthen the concave side. Although there is no need to expose vertebral artery, preoperative CTA(computed tomography angiography) should be performed routinely to determine whether there is abnormality in vertebral artery and whether it will interfere with the distraction on concave side and the placement of prosthesis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
        • Peking University Third Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with congenital cervical scoliosis were enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the presence of torticollis caused by congenital cervical scoliosis (defined as a Cobb angle of >10°)
  • operation and follow-up were performed in our hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other causes of torticollis appearance, such as muscular torticollis, ocular torticollis, neurogenic torticollis, etc.
  • Patients with other spinal deformity or disease, such as cervical kyphosis or kyphoscoliosis, congenital deformity of middle and lower thoracic vertebra, lumbar vertebra, ankylosing spondylitis, severe ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament, etc.
  • Cervical infectious diseases, cervical primary or metastatic tumor
  • Have a history of spinal trauma or surgery
  • Imaging data are incomplete or of poor quality.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Convex resection group
Patients were used hemivertebra resection procedure on convex side to treat congenital cervical scoliosis.
Patients were used hemivertebra resection procedure to treat congenital cervical scoliosis.
Concave distraction group
Patients were used distraction and lateral opening procedure on concave side to treat congenital cervical scoliosis, without hemivertebra resection.
Patients were used distraction and lateral opening procedure to treat congenital cervical scoliosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the structural Cobb angle
Time Frame: one week pre operation
the large curve in the segments with vertebral deformities causing clinical asymmetry or head deviation and needs to be surgically corrected
one week pre operation
the structural Cobb angle
Time Frame: one week after surgery
the large curve in the segments with vertebral deformities causing clinical asymmetry or head deviation and needs to be surgically corrected
one week after surgery
the structural Cobb angle
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the large curve in the segments with vertebral deformities causing clinical asymmetry or head deviation and needs to be surgically corrected
through study completion, an average of 1 year
distal compensatory Cobb angle
Time Frame: one week pre operation
the small curve without vertebral deformities
one week pre operation
distal compensatory Cobb angle
Time Frame: one week after surgery
the small curve without vertebral deformities
one week after surgery
distal compensatory Cobb angle
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the small curve without vertebral deformities
through study completion, an average of 1 year
mandibular incline
Time Frame: one week pre operation
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the mandibular angles on both sides
one week pre operation
mandibular incline
Time Frame: one week after surgery
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the mandibular angles on both sides
one week after surgery
mandibular incline
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the mandibular angles on both sides
through study completion, an average of 1 year
clavicle angle
Time Frame: one week pre operation
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the clavicular distal end on both sides
one week pre operation
clavicle angle
Time Frame: one week after surgery
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the clavicular distal end on both sides
one week after surgery
clavicle angle
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the angle between the horizontal line and the line through the clavicular distal end on both sides
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
blood loss
Time Frame: during operation
blood loss during operation
during operation
surgical time duration
Time Frame: during operation
surgical time duration during operation
during operation
complications
Time Frame: peroperative period
complications during and after operation
peroperative period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yu Sun, MD, Peking University Third Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congenital Scoliosis Due to Bony Malformation

Clinical Trials on hemivertebra resection on convex side

3
Subscribe